Re: [PD] Pd 0.43 Vanilla under Ubuntu

2011-05-10 Thread olsen
He Funs thanks for your reply - i 'solved' the problem the same way: $ sudo cp ~pd/src/pd-0.43-0/tcl/* /usr/local/lib/pd/tcl/ salutis ø After that executing ``pd'' worked. I hope this information might be helpful. Funs -- ETs DNA will not be televised http://hasa-labs.org

Re: [PD] udpsend performance issue

2011-05-10 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-05-08 19:48, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: Hi, If I send a few hundreds packed OSC messages with [udpsend], it blocks for about 100-200 milliseconds or more (I see the message udpsend blocked for xxx milliseconds in the console, and I notice

Re: [PD] auto-completion with popup [was: 3 new gui-plugins]

2011-05-10 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-05-08 18:40, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Also, I think Pd-extended should include a number of plugins by default, like perhaps your completion plugin. So that would mean that the plugin reports would be shown by default. though it's a

Re: [PD] helpbrowser and the paths

2011-05-10 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-05-09 15:48, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: On Tue, 3 May 2011, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: given that both GF and Gem are to add their paths automatically on startup, the left column if the help-browser might have 500 help-patches and several

Re: [PD] multiple OSC messages in one udp packet?

2011-05-10 Thread Claude Heiland-Allen
On 10/05/11 10:38, matteo sisti sette wrote: Does the OSC standard (or to be more precise, the standard for OSC over UDP) allow to pack multiple OSC messages into a single UDP packet? No time to read it all myself, but: http://opensoundcontrol.org/spec-1_0 I ask this because I am sending OSC

Re: [PD] GLSL Abstractions Library for Pd/GEM

2011-05-10 Thread mark edward grimm
lost the repository when my server crashed (about two years ago). ha!! yeah sounds familiar :) thats happened to me on a few occasions... hopefully I have the time to fix all that some time. awesome... thanks. if you find them let me know... cheers mark did not put anything online since

Re: [PD] tcpserver for sending files?

2011-05-10 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Mon, 9 May 2011, Martin wrote: It opens the file relative to the folder containing [tcpserver] (it calls fopen with whatever path you give it). Isn't that only because you start pd from the folder containing [tcpserver] ?

Re: [PD] 0.43 should still be a test version

2011-05-10 Thread Matteo Sisti Sette
On 05/08/2011 04:35 PM, yvan volochine wrote: On 05/08/2011 02:14 PM, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: Here are three bugs that make it unusable, all of them are regressions: [...] bug 3273884: mouse wheel scrolling doesn't work (it scrolls all the way down and all the way up in a single step) bug

Re: [PD] 0.43 should still be a test version

2011-05-10 Thread Matteo Sisti Sette
On 05/08/2011 02:28 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: i guess you are aware that not being able to broadcast UDP packets is not a bug at all, it's simply a missing feature. No, I was not aware of that. Is it really? On windows, you can broadcast UDP packets with a [netsend 1] by sending it a

Re: [PD] tcpserver for sending files?

2011-05-10 Thread Martin
On 10/05/11 11:34 AM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: On Mon, 9 May 2011, Martin wrote: It opens the file relative to the folder containing [tcpserver] (it calls fopen with whatever path you give it). Isn't that only because you start pd from the folder containing [tcpserver] ? Yes, that seems

Re: [PD] CVs

2011-05-10 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Mon, 9 May 2011, Bryan Jurish wrote: sqrt(2) ? exp(1) ? pi ? ... certainly each of the usual suspects has a discrete specification, but I've always been a bit suspicious of the hardcore constructionist approach to irrational numbers Of course, infinitely long patternless sequences of

Re: [PD] 0.43 should still be a test version

2011-05-10 Thread Martin
On 10/05/11 12:10 PM, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: On 05/08/2011 02:28 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: i guess you are aware that not being able to broadcast UDP packets is not a bug at all, it's simply a missing feature. No, I was not aware of that. Is it really? On windows, you can broadcast

Re: [PD] CVs

2011-05-10 Thread Jaime Oliver
My favorite example of a continuous sound is saying the word continuous: the uou part of it. J ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] CVs

2011-05-10 Thread Billy Stiltner
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Andy Farnell padawa...@obiwannabe.co.ukwrote: On Mon, 9 May 2011 07:08:18 -0400 Billy Stiltner billy.stilt...@gmail.com wrote: Now imagine a whammy bar fixed with the smoothest bearings and axle known. Now imagine the atomic structure of the axle and

Re: [PD] 0.43 should still be a test version

2011-05-10 Thread Matteo Sisti Sette
On 05/10/2011 06:56 PM, Martin wrote: I don't have any trouble here with [udpsend] and debian lenny. I don't have any trouble with [udpsend] either. It's [netsend 1] that can't broadcast (neither in Pd Vanilla 0.42.5 nor Pd Extended 0.42.5) Any time you get permission denied it's up to

Re: [PD] auto-completion with popup [was: 3 new gui-plugins]

2011-05-10 Thread András Murányi
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:19, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2011-05-08 18:40, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Also, I think Pd-extended should include a number of plugins by default, like perhaps your completion plugin. So

Re: [PD] CVs

2011-05-10 Thread Andy Farnell
On Tue, 10 May 2011 13:02:19 -0400 Billy Stiltner billy.stilt...@gmail.com wrote: I didn't think it through very well. Best to figure it out at the theoretical stage before you hurt yourself trying. ;) a. -- Andy Farnell padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk

Re: [PD] 0.43 should still be a test version

2011-05-10 Thread Martin
On 10/05/11 01:40 PM, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: On 05/10/2011 06:56 PM, Martin wrote: I don't have any trouble here with [udpsend] and debian lenny. I don't have any trouble with [udpsend] either. It's [netsend 1] that can't broadcast (neither in Pd Vanilla 0.42.5 nor Pd Extended 0.42.5)

Re: [PD] Switch from PureData!

2011-05-10 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Mon, 2 May 2011, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: Now it's perfectly fine that it shows one example that gives the strengths of supercollider and a completely different example for the strengths of pure data. But it certainly begs the question http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question

Re: [PD] CVs

2011-05-10 Thread Chris McCormick
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:12:04PM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: It doesn't mean that those artifacts don't exist in the physical world, it means that we had to invent those concepts by ourselves because we can't perceive them from the physical world. At the very least they exist physically

[PD] gui-plugins management [was: auto-completion with popup]

2011-05-10 Thread yvan volochine
On 05/10/2011 08:55 PM, András Murányi wrote: though it's a bit annoying that the user cannot chose to _not_ use a certain plugin. (moving the foo-plugins folder into a disabled/ folder is probably a not such a good idea either, as in this case this would be a global operation

Re: [PD] The economics of Open source

2011-05-10 Thread Chris McCormick
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 09:21:58AM +0100, Pierre Massat wrote: I was trying to get Ardour to work last night and i came accross the forum on their website. I must say i was quite shocked to see how many posts were about money. I was equally surprized to see that the latest full version of

Re: [PD] CVs

2011-05-10 Thread Patrice Colet
- Chris McCormick ch...@mccormick.cx a écrit : On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:12:04PM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote: It doesn't mean that those artifacts don't exist in the physical world, it means that we had to invent those concepts by ourselves because we can't perceive them from