Hi, I live in G(h)ent!
could you give some more details about what the project is about?
On 7 March 2012 16:00, Joe Higham joehig...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone (or nearly everyone),
I'm looking for someone to collaborate with on a project for April (2012 of
course), here in Belgium. I
Make sure to use the interval 0 - Pi/2, panning beyond will only
crossfade back and forth
On 6 February 2012 15:29, Jaime Oliver jaime.oliv...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's an argument for plain linear crossfade.
I get power boosts with cosine crossfades...
best,
J
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:53
If you guys 'd done your math, you'd know there is an ancient algorithm for
approximating numbers by fractions and its called continued fractions.
On 16 December 2011 18:38, Lorenzo Sutton lorenzofsut...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16/12/11 16:05, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
looks like a job for
Im not sure what the best way is to instantiate variable number of objects,
for example consider polysynth.pd:
Theres a fixed number of manually placed voices, suppose I want to have the
top patch to contain a counter through which one may increase or decrease
the number of voices, how would I go
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ludwig Maes ludwig.m...@gmail.com
Date: 28 September 2011 19:29
Subject: Re: [PD] Variable number of objects?
To: Ingo i...@miamiwave.com
I actually meant more in general, also for non-~ signals (i.e. also control
rate .pd patches). I referred
Perhaps better rephrased: how does one use arrays of .pd objects? or
variable length vectors/lists?
On 28 September 2011 19:29, Ludwig Maes ludwig.m...@gmail.com wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ludwig Maes ludwig.m...@gmail.com
Date: 28 September 2011 19:29
Subject: Re
to make the poly object more compatible with the ADSR philosophy, it would
be nice if you could tell poly the release time (after note-offs) to keep a
voice free if its possible.
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
Hi is there some git project or similar for versioning of patches?
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Hi, ive been playing around with the synth in the stuff folder and noticed
some mistakes/strange manipulations, the weird thing is that it works out of
the box. Originally I considered it as a serious example, but since certain
things dont work properly or are strange I thought perhaps this was
so standard objects have right to left ordering of outlet processing, but
what about send and receive for messages? if multiple objects receive for
the same name, which one gets it first? is there a triggerlike object for
messages, or should I send multiple messages each with a differentiated tag
Here in belgium, in dutch, we also say other right/left, but since
french is one of our languages, that could be the origin, on the other
hand I dont really believe its language related: from inside a head
your left eye is not the same as from outside the head (like face
culling in OpenGL,...).
wow,
I always felt message passing was unnecessarily expensive but I didnt
realise message passing was that expensive!
I seriously think it would be good to have a pd front end for gcc, a
few of us should take the time to learn GIMPLE and implement a
compile menu item to compile
Or more generally, watch the histogram of samples
On 10 January 2011 11:09, Roman Haefeli reduz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2011-01-09 at 20:26 -0500, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011, ~E. wrote:
I'm searching how i can detect the change in the compression of an audio
signal.
How would one (and how hard or easy would it be) write a patch which
does the following:
Instruct the user to play a sustained note on the violin; then give
feedback about how accurate Helmholtz motion is achieved; Could we
measure how short the transient takes from nonHelmholtz motion to
ratio of close to 2:3 but not exactly 2:3 (i.e. equal
temperament), also modelock to the just(=pythagorean/integer ratio)
interval 2:3? would the one out of 2 slips on one string be
simultaneous with one out of 3 slips on the other?
On 11 December 2010 20:29, Ludwig Maes ludwig.m...@gmail.com wrote
Could you be more specific, im not sure I entirely understand the problem...
On 8 December 2010 08:32, Daniel K. konarsonarsmo...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm working on re-realizing a piece I wrote for subwoofer that is meant to
be felt by touching the speaker cone instead of hearing it. This is done
The processor running Pd must not be inside the vacuum cleaner, so we
can still use his precious code :) as long as the processor blows its
OK i guess...
On 4 December 2010 02:40, João Pais jmmmp...@googlemail.com wrote:
From now on I refuse to allow my code to be used in anything that sucks.
I was wondering if somebody made HHT objects in Pd like:
[EMD x], splitting a signal in IMF (intrinsic mode) functions...?
How hard would it be to implement?
Greetings!
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
I even mean a third algorithm...
I am focused more the empirical mode decomposition put forward by
Huang, ... after splitting the signal in IMFs they are individually
analyzed by Hilbert transform, or other time frequency transform of
choice...
Im more looking to EMD, but I just found some matlab
could you give examples of idealized input and output for cases 1-4?
im not sure I understand what exactly you want...
interested greetings!
Ludwig
On 1 November 2010 13:09, brandon zeeb zeeb.bran...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey All,
I've been burning my brain over this issue lately and I can't seem
is any floor
or the like...
have fun!
ps:
in your example: q=q0-k*a with for example q(0)=0.001 and
q(0.8)=0.0001: q:=0.001-0.0009/0.8*a
then f=2558.427881-.11*ln(10.-9.*a)
and inverse=easy
On 2 November 2010 19:20, Ludwig Maes ludwig.m...@gmail.com wrote:
This is pretty easy actually, I
The reason you use the inverse is so that the amplitude remains the
same albeit quantized. The reason we use another function before
flooring is to distritube the floor levels.But afterwards we need to
bring the values back to their original place
On 2 November 2010 19:37, Ludwig Maes ludwig.m
And we want f' to be 1 (integer step) / (per) quantization size (for
that amplitude)
On 2 November 2010 19:41, Ludwig Maes ludwig.m...@gmail.com wrote:
The reason you use the inverse is so that the amplitude remains the
same albeit quantized. The reason we use another function before
flooring
Watch out in my numeric example, I was a bit careless and the q I
chose continues to increase for more and more negative amplitudes!
On 2 November 2010 19:44, Ludwig Maes ludwig.m...@gmail.com wrote:
And we want f' to be 1 (integer step) / (per) quantization size (for
that amplitude)
On 2
Hi, I was wondering how one would locate a vowel in the IPA vowel
quadrangle using pd...
Of course I would expect the corners of the vowel to depend on
individual characteristics, but I dont know where to start.
Anyone any ideas?
Greetings,
Ludwig
___
As I said, I am no expert at all in this, but I can explain what
motivated me to make these specific remarks, and express my beliefs or
doubts:
On 28 September 2010 19:35, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca wrote:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, Ludwig Maes wrote:
I think that if we could write a Pd
I think that if we could write a Pd = GIMPLE converter (hence a Pd
frontend) for gcc, that gcc could do quite a lot of optimization for
us.
I could be wrong but I have the impression that every message between
Pd objects is sent as an abstracted structure and not optimized for
architecture to the
interesting indeed,
somebody might have posted a cool puredata tutorial on youtube? or ...
On 17 September 2010 00:16, Hans-Christoph Steiner h...@at.or.at wrote:
I was just looking at the Pd-extended download stats and there was a huge
spike on June 8th and 9th of this year, from about 300 a
The FIR~ object apparently only allows convolution lengths =3, I
couldnt get it to work with length 2. probably some offset problem? or
hardcoded assumption that it will be longer than 2?
Greetings,
Ludwig
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE
29 matches
Mail list logo
