Re: [PD] external viewers for additional file types ?

2007-03-16 Thread Pete Redest
launch a user-defined app. We could provide some succint initial version of it, in the spirit of my initial post(s). Best regards, -P From: IOhannes m zmoelnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Pete Redest [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: pd-list@iem.at Subject: Re: [PD] external viewers for additional file types ? Date

Re: [PD] external viewers for additional file types ?

2007-03-14 Thread Pete Redest
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Pete Redest [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: pd-list@iem.at Subject: Re: [PD] external viewers for additional file types ? Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:09:29 +0100 Pete Redest wrote: Probably the easiest would be to launch an external script that incorporates the added viewer table

Re: [PD] external viewers for additional file types ?

2007-03-12 Thread Pete Redest
Will take a look at the code and check for use of tk_fileChooser - may be someone has more specific info I can use. BTW, I am guessing that the particular bad behavior when clicking on a PDF file, is that there is a bug in the browser, whereby it takes the .pd of the .pdf suffix and believes it

Re: [PD] external viewers for additional file types ?

2007-03-12 Thread Pete Redest
. Will get to it sometime soon. Thanks! -Peter From: Pete Redest [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], pd-list@iem.at Subject: Re: [PD] external viewers for additional file types ? Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 03:19:48 + Will take a look at the code and check for use of tk_fileChooser - may

Re: [PD] PD Workshop files

2007-03-08 Thread Pete Redest
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2007 10:36:35 +0100 Hallo, Pete Redest hat gesagt: // Pete Redest wrote: Anyways, for the benefit of Jared and of others interested in downloading the examples/tutorial/workshop from CVS, I am attaching a script, which surely can be adjusted/improved in several ways

Re: [PD] PD Workshop files

2007-03-07 Thread Pete Redest
I am also new to this list, so that I won't make many judgements about what is off here. I intuit that asking for downloading tutorial files that are learning materials for the main topic of the list, is not off topic. But again, I am neither a list veteran nor a list admin. Just one more Joe

Re: [PD] GEM doesn't compile in Fedora Core 5

2007-02-16 Thread Pete Redest
Super info! THANKS - will post here how it went as soon as I do it. Did you mean that by having compiled/installed PD already I have already GEM?. Thanks Peter From: IOhannes m zmoelnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Pete Redest [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: pd-list@iem.at Subject: Re: [PD] GEM doesn't compile

Re: [PD] GEM doesn't compile in Fedora Core 5

2007-02-16 Thread Pete Redest
be lost. THANK YOU AGAIN!! TioP (Peter) From: IOhannes m zmoelnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Pete Redest [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: pd-list@iem.at Subject: Re: [PD] GEM doesn't compile in Fedora Core 5 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:30:28 +0100 hi. Pete Redest wrote: 1. Trying to compile GEM in Fedora Core

[PD] GEM doesn't compile in Fedora Core 5

2007-02-15 Thread Pete Redest
Hi there. New to the list. Is it OK to ask about GEM here? If yes, here is the question, if not, just advice me and I will try something else. This is the problem: 1. Trying to compile GEM in Fedora Core 5. - downloaded the packages gem-0.90.0.tar.gz and GemLibs-LINUX-1.tar.gz from