On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 19:30 +0200, Bjørn Nielsen wrote:
> So Babsycos original question still goes unanswered (besides the
> really good advice about jack): can you decrease the latency with
> improving you hardware?
considering, that i am running pd 0.42 on jackd on ubuntu on a t61 with
a rme rp
On Sun, 2009-10-18 at 10:22 +, babsyco babsyco wrote:
> Thanks guys, but the latency is still around 20ms when I don't use the
> soundcard (I just tried it with the built in mic-that's the same as
> jack for all intensive purposes, right?). Any other suggestions as to
> how I can get it lower?
On Mon, 2009-10-05 at 09:59 +0300, Gintaras Lau. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I send a message [gcalctool(_[system] and my calculator starts. E.g. I
> send a message [echo $USERNAME(_[system] and would like to get it back
> to pd.
> How to input messages from the system?
>
> Thank you.
[system] apparentl
hi all
i had encountered some issues with the object class [writesf~] in the
modes -batch and -nogui.
i was told by dmotd in #dataflow this might be related to setting the
samplerate for certain samplerate dependent object is not happening at
the correct time in -nogui mode. i found two work work
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 12:44 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Sep 4, 2009, at 12:09 PM, glerm soares wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > 2009/9/4 glerm soares
> >
> >
> >
> > I have yet to see any computer or electronic music
> >
On Sun, 2009-08-30 at 13:08 -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> ping.
64 bytes from 89.217.0.255: icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=104949295 ms
___
Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail:
ht
On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 11:25 -0400, Jaime Oliver wrote:
> why not usb2? I am using the playsation 3 camera with great results
> and its about 30$
is it really USB 2.0 ? virtually any usb camera i checked advertises
itself as USB 2.0, though the few ones i tried are actually using 'only'
UHCI (which
On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 12:46 -0400, Martin Peach wrote:
> nick burge wrote:
> > Hello list.Intrigued by the idea of playing back jpeg (or other) files
> > as audio signals I've been having a go with the readsf~ and soundfiler
> > objectsskipping the header with readsf~ and using the -raw fl
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 09:03 +, dwanafite wrote:
> Hi
>
> You could use [readsf~ 12] to read your file and then several [writesf~ 2] to
> record, but i guess you want something faster... However, I don't know how
> readsf~ behaves with 12 tracks/32-bits files (that's somewhat extreme).
this
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 17:07 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On May 25, 2009, at 9:17 PM, danomatika wrote:
> > I don't really need an accelerated gui as I like what Pd has now, I
> > just think these basic elements should not peg the cpu in -nogui
> > mode. That way I can work in a nic
Am 26.05.2009 um 15:04 schrieb danomatika:
My point is, I wish pd didn't force me to work it's way but allow me
to work my way. That's the beauty of patching as opposed to vsts,
etc. You have to build form the ground up.
i don't fully understand, why you feel forced to program in a certai
Am 26.05.2009 um 16:23 schrieb Chris McCormick:
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 03:34:51PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
danomatika hat gesagt: // danomatika wrote:
My point is, I wish pd didn't force me to work it's way but allow
me to
work my way. That's the beauty of patching as opposed
On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 00:12 +0200, Thomas Grill wrote:
> Hi all,
> i'm preparing a lecture about artistic strategies of recontextualizing
> the acoustic environment. Therein, i would like to include one or more
> recordings of RjDj scenes that use predominantly online sounds from
> the actual
On Fri, 2009-05-15 at 11:21 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On May 15, 2009, at 4:09 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>
> >
> > Am 14.05.2009 um 22:14 schrieb Hans-Christoph Steiner:
> >
> >>
> >> On May 9, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Martin Peach wrote:
> >&g
Am 14.05.2009 um 22:14 schrieb Hans-Christoph Steiner:
On May 9, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Martin Peach wrote:
Roman Haefeli wrote:
thanks for the info.
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 19:27 +, martin.pe...@sympatico.ca wrote:
just out of curiosity: if there is a solution, that works well for
it behaves like the opposite on my machine. the abstraction based patch
measures 6ms and the one, that generates everything from scratch,
measures ~300ms.
now, after claude's explanation, i think, i know why this is the case. i
don't have any pathes loaded at all in my preferences. i try to do
ev
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 09:24 +0200, Matthias Blau wrote:
> Olivier,
>
> this may be even more off-topic, but I would really be interested in
> getting pulseaudio to work nicely together with jack on Ubuntu 8.04 -
> could you please share your configuration?
>
> Thanks, Matthias
hm.. i wasn't a
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 20:11 +0800, Lao Yu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> very nice to stop and spend some time - thanks a lot for your messages!
>
> I should perhaps wait another 2 weeks until F10 is officially
> released - if I'm still stuck I will get back to the list (or
> directly to Adrian). As far as
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 11:15 +0100, Andrew Faraday wrote:
> Hey all
>
>
> I've been working on a delay-based patch for a sort of instant ambient
> sound.
>
>
> It's all about two high feedback delays, one at 200 ms and one at ten
> seconds. So whatever got into a mic is repeated and stretched o
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 01:31 -0500, adrian.g wrote:
> For the Ubuntu studio I have to say that I don't have any personal
> experience but I've been watching their mailing list and it seems that
> a lot of people are having problems with the 9.04 + real time kernel.
> If you want to work with audio
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 11:26 +0800, Lao Yu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since the release of F9 I look at the audio part of Linux - I
> personally find it a complete disaster and 'user-hostile' to be
> polite. Many on this list are software specialists, so please don't
> look down on someone who doesn't
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 13:28 -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>
>
> --- On Sun, 5/10/09, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>
> > From: Roman Haefeli
> > Subject: Re: [PD] signal / message
> > To: "Wolfgang Jäger"
> > Cc: pd-list@iem.at
> > Date: Sunday, M
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 17:29 +0200, Wolfgang Jäger wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What's the best way to convert a signal into a message?
> There are possibilities like snapshot~ or vsnapshot~, but they are not
> accurate. The error they produce when you convert into a message and
> reconvert to a signal (wit
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 08:56 -0500, John Harrison wrote:
> In terms of recording the Geos here's a sample patch of how I might do
> that. Idea, method, and code stolen liberally from Marius Schebella's
> posts to this list.
>
> In terms of framerate, I am not sure but I would have guessed that yo
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 21:21 -0300, glerm soares wrote:
> Is there any project of abstractions that uses Gem as Graphic User
> Interface seriously?
>
> I mean: Create other design of tables, envelopes, data representation,
> even other design of buttons, leds, sliders and knobs that could be
> mani
thanks for the info.
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 19:27 +, martin.pe...@sympatico.ca wrote:
> > just out of curiosity: if there is a solution, that works well for
> > [tcpserver], couldn't it be applied also to [comport]?
> >
> Maybe. But I think you should be able to use [comport] with no
> hardwar
On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 08:14 -0400, Martin Peach wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> >
> > So right now, when [comport] is open and that device gets disconnected,
> > comport freezes and Pd crashes. My guess is that comport is waiting and
> > therefore blocking. It seems like the select()
yo, i think, it is useful to keep that on the list.
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 20:48 +0200, Christian Fischer wrote:
> yo super!
> ich habe schon mit einem einfachen patch und numberboxes
> experimentiert. das mit den levels ist auch klar.
> ich habe zwei macs mit einem lan kabel verbunden. ohne
>
On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 21:05 +0200, Christian Fischer wrote:
> hi everybody,
>
> i am quite new to this list and pd.
> so there is a problem with the netpd objects.
>
> i have an mac os10.4.11 and pd 0.40.3 extended.
>
> unfortunately pd cannot create any pdnet-object. but the chat and the
> c
On Fri, 2009-04-24 at 10:32 +0900, hard off wrote:
> just a sidenote, but you do know about [switch~] to turn off audio
> processing in a subpatch/abstraction, right?
>
> i used to have a patch that had about 3000 dsp building blocks
> (oscillators, filters, waveshapers, eq, effects, etc), and the
ng so much time on OS X?
roman
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 6:52 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 00:23 +0900, hard off wrote:
> >> what about something like sending a value to the inlet of an audio
> >> arithmetic object? would that update the dsp
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 00:23 +0900, hard off wrote:
> what about something like sending a value to the inlet of an audio
> arithmetic object? would that update the dsptree?
>
> i'm wondering why the audio in my abstractions is working, because i
> don't think i am doing any of those things.
>
afa
i think, the samplingrate, that pd thinks it is using and the one that
it is actually using, are differnt.
try an [osc~ 440], it will sound like a d.
can't tell, what is causing that confusion. check your soundcard
settings. 1.5 could be related to 32kHz (real) <-> 48kHz (imaginary)
confusion.
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 07:41 +0200, danomatika wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I'm wondering if anyone has used PD to read internet radio streams?
>
in german, one would say 'jein', for yes and no. i did work on a project
with pd controlling radio streams, but i haven't used pd to actually
receive the stre
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 18:35 +0200, Derek Holzer wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
> these are good, but too much complex dataflow for beginner tutorial
> right now!
frankly, that is what i actually thought as well.
> I wrote my way around the problem a bit, have a look if you
> are interested:
>
> http:
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 16:13 +0200, Derek Holzer wrote:
> Thanks Roman,
>
> I'd love it if you could look at the Generating Waveforms and
> Antialiasing chapters ion the FLOSS Manual a bit later on after I have
> time to day to work on them and give me some feedback ;-)
just drop me a message.
r
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 15:15 +0200, Derek Holzer wrote:
> I'm writing a tutorial on using sinesum to generate wavetables for the
> FLOSS Manual. In typical fashion, the current "all_about_arrays"
> documentation merely (lazily?) directs users to Google "partials" to
> find out how to build the
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 19:45 +0200, Martin Schied wrote:
>
> Nevertheless it's very weird and I don't understand why the order of
> loading something can be interfering with priorities. It would be nice
> to have a place to put information like this - i wonder why there are
> no other people r
Von: Frank Barknecht
Gesendet: Montag, den 30. März 2009, 19:03:35 Uhr
> While the oscillators in s_osc.pd all go from -1 to 1, I don't really see why
> a
> triangle wave should not go from 0-1 as well. This may even be useful in
> certain applications. All it takes to convert it is a multiply
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 13:35 +0100, Bjørn Nielsen wrote:
> > from your first email, it sounds like you are expecting a pitch shift. So
> > how does the pitch shift you are hearing differ from what you are expecting
> > i.e. define "weird." I take it you tried different numbers where the 50 is
> > i.
On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 00:37 +, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> >
> > Anyone know of a patch that maps an FFT over time to something like a
> > curve3d in Gem? I remember a while back people posted something like
> > that, but I can't find it.
> >
> > .hc
>
>
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 11:53 -0700, mark edward grimm wrote:
> i have been "trying" to use shell... works OK in linux but in osx it just
> crashes.
>
> i am just wondering if this thread went anywhere:
>
> http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2009-01/067700.html
>
> i have it in a bunch
On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 14:30 -0500, Martin Peach wrote:
> Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 19:54 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> >> hi again
> >>
> >> a new stupid little problem occured. when working with [tcpserver], i
> >> usually identi
On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 19:54 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> hi again
>
> a new stupid little problem occured. when working with [tcpserver], i
> usually identify the clients by their socket number and not by their
> client number; for two reasons: when a message is received or
hi again
a new stupid little problem occured. when working with [tcpserver], i
usually identify the clients by their socket number and not by their
client number; for two reasons: when a message is received or a new
client connects, you can only know the socket number of it (since there
is a dedic
On Sat, 2009-03-07 at 11:26 +0100, Enrique Erne wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> > The Google Summer of Code ((http://code.google.com/soc/) application
> > is due very soon, March 9th, and we need mentors! At this point, you
> > just need to put down your name. Then once the projects
--- Mathieu Bouchard schrieb am Fr, 6.3.2009:
>
> > Unless you happen to be listening to Carter, Cowell,
> Ferneyhough, Johnston, Nancarrow, or anyone who has ever
> happened to use a quintuplet (Chopin, Elvin Jones, maybe Al
> Pacino in "Heat")
>
> I didn't say that quintuplets don't happen
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 09:14 -0500, Martin Peach wrote:
> > martin, would you mind implementing similar changes to [tcpclient] as
> > well?
> >
> >
>
> I'll do that today if I have time.
yo... no hurry.. but it seems you already did it. many thanks.
those changes to [tcpserver] and [tcpclient
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 08:08 +0900, PSPunch wrote:
> The earlier sounds like to introduce massive overhead caused by TCP
> headers, especially when we are speak of sending amounts of data that
> may flood the socket's "send buffer." In the later case, the OS may
> indicate that bytes entered the s
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 18:44 +0900, PSPunch wrote:
> > i really wonder, how other projects handle that. i mean, if several
> > people download a big file from apache, then a disappearing client
> > doesn't interfere with the other clients. i guess, in apache it is
> > solved by using threads. when u
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 00:45 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> how do i know, when the [tcpserver] socket is ready to transmit another
> byte? do i have to nag it every ms with a message? if i go the
> BYTE-AT-A-TIME route, the interval would even need to be slower
i either wanted to say &
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 00:45 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>
> how do i know, when the [tcpserver] socket is ready to transmit another
> byte? do i have to nag it every ms with a message? if i go the
> BYTE-AT-A-TIME route, the interval would even need to be slower, if
> higher trou
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 18:51 -0500, Martin Peach wrote:
> Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 22:53 -0500, Martin Peach wrote:
>
> >> So I made [tcpserver] send the messages one byte at a time. This latest
> >> version should not block, since it adds
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 22:53 -0500, Martin Peach wrote:
> Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 19:30 -0500, Martin Peach wrote:
> >> I think the blocking happens because the
> >> connection is gone, not because of the buffer overflowing.
> >
> >
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 19:54 -0500, Dafydd Hughes wrote:
> Hi David
>
> I'm sure it's easier than I'm making it.
>
> Really, I just need to turn the data from the arduino into usable
> floats. Right now it's coming in as ascii characters and I'm building
> lists between carriage returns. Hopefully
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 00:02 +, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
> Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 17:01 -0500, Martin Peach wrote:
> [snip]
> >> Probably I need to set the sockets to nonblocking.
> >
> > what does that mean: setting sockets to non-
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 19:30 -0500, Martin Peach wrote:
>
> But if you know how much data you want to send you could set the buffer
> to at least that size first.
yeah, this works for the very first time you send a chunk of data. the
next time, you don't know, if the buffer is already empty agai
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 17:01 -0500, Martin Peach wrote:
> So I added a [clientbuf( message to [tcpserver] to get/set the size of
> the send buffer. Apparently the actual buffer will be twice this size.
when i set the buffer to 10, i get a message:
tcpserver_buf_size: client 1 set to 2048
when no
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 14:01 -0500, Martin Peach wrote:
> Martin Peach wrote:
> > Roman Haefeli wrote:
> >> i don't know, how much control you have at c level over what is
> >> happening at tcp level. in order to solve the current issues at
> >> pd-level, in
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 12:56 -0500, Martin Peach wrote:
> Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 21:15 +, Martin Peach wrote:
> >> Roman Haefeli wrote:
> >>> --- Martin Peach schrieb am Di, 24.2.2009:
> >>>> Roman Haefeli wrote:
> &
On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 21:15 +, Martin Peach wrote:
> Roman Haefeli wrote:
> >--- Martin Peach schrieb am Di, 24.2.2009:
> > > Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > > >>> On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 21:03 +, Martin
> > > Peach wrote:
> > > Yes, I agree.
--- Martin Peach schrieb am Di, 24.2.2009:
> Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 19:05 -0500, Martin Peach wrote:
> >> Roman Haefeli wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 21:03 +, Martin
> Peach wrote:
> >>>> OK I fixed it now in
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 19:05 -0500, Martin Peach wrote:
> Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 21:03 +, Martin Peach wrote:
> >> OK I fixed it now in svn. It works on debian. The select() call was not
> >> being done properly. Now I need to test it on
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 22:42 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
>
> Personally I'd do heavy text processing in something like pdlua. Pd
> feels awkward when processing text.
but even if you do not heavy text processing, there are ways to pollute
the symbol table heavily. it is sufficient to only disp
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 13:55 -0800, Phil Stone wrote:
> Frank Barknecht wrote:
> > Hallo,
> > Phil Stone hat gesagt: // Phil Stone wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Frank Barknecht wrote:
> >>
> >>> A fix for this maketime would be to reuse the symbols ":00" ... ":59"
> >>> for minutes and hours by using
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 21:03 +, Martin Peach wrote:
> Roman Haefeli wrote:
>
> > > >with the newest [tcpserver] i cannot send messages to clients anymore.
> >i
> > > >tried both, 'send ' and 'client '. whenever
> > > >[
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 19:10 +, Martin Peach wrote:
>
>
> >From: Roman Haefeli
> >Reply-To: reduzie...@yahoo.de
> >To: Martin Peach
> >CC: PD list
> >Subject: Re: [PD] pd and tcp: what to do against crashes?
> >Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:50:4
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 19:10 +, Martin Peach wrote:
>
>
> >From: Roman Haefeli
> >Reply-To: reduzie...@yahoo.de
> >To: Martin Peach
> >CC: PD list
> >Subject: Re: [PD] pd and tcp: what to do against crashes?
> >Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:50:44 +010
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 18:42 -0500, Martin Peach wrote:
> Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 17:30 -0500, Martin Peach wrote:
> >
> >> Maybe you could try it (I just uploaded it to the svn at
> >> http://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pure
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 17:30 -0500, Martin Peach wrote:
> Maybe you could try it (I just uploaded it to the svn at
> http://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pure-data/trunk/externals/mrpeach/net/)
>
> and see if anything changes.
>
now, i cannot compile it anymore, when i do:
cd /externa
11584 tcpserver/linux
131760 tcpclient/OS X
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 17:30 -0500, Martin Peach wrote:
> I just tried with 2 machines having [tcpserver] (WinXP) repeatedly send
> to [tcpclient] (Ubuntu) while I pulled out the cable from one machine.
> The server keeps sending until it disconnects a
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 15:17 -0500, Martin Peach wrote:
> Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 12:59 -0500, Martin Peach wrote:
> >> Hi Roman,
> >> I think it probably comes down to the code not checking for all possible
> >> error conditions.
> &
On Sun, 2009-02-22 at 16:30 +0100, august wrote:
> > danomatika wrote:
> > >Has anyone been using pd on a 64 bit GNU/Linux OS?
> >
> >
> > i've been running Pd (vanilla, + zexy,Gem and all myother stuff and some
> > stuff by others) on 64bit debian for some years now, and i havent had
> > any m
On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 12:59 -0500, Martin Peach wrote:
> Hi Roman,
> I think it probably comes down to the code not checking for all possible
> error conditions.
cool, if it would be as simple as that.
> Under udp you can send as much as you like to
> nonexistent receivers but tcp needs an act
On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 17:28 +0100, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've already browsed the archives and found some helpful information
> about getting low latency in Windows with PD.
>
> Now i'd love to hear about anyone who has been able to get as low as
> 15-20ms latency in Windows using
hi all
i've been working now quite some time with setups, where different
instances of pd spread over the world are connected with each other over
another instance of pd (i.e. serverpatch). i tried different classes for
establishing tcp connections between clients and servers, namely
[netclient]/[
On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 03:46 -0800, Luke Iannini wrote:
> Yo - anyone have any ideas on getting the focus state of a window in
> Pd? I want to only enable key commands when the relevant window is
> focused - I have lots of miniature applications and it makes much more
> sense to treat them independ
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 20:59 -0800, B. Bogart wrote:
> Hey all.
>
> I've managed to get my patches to use less objects, and more messages.
>
> Problem I have now is storing data in an organized way.
>
> Basically the system I'm working on needs to store the RGB hists of many
> images (10,000 idea
On Sat, 2009-02-21 at 01:38 +0100, David Doukhan wrote:
> Does the Swiss Pro Helvetia fund works for european who are not living in
> Swiss?
> Does anyone have an idea on the way to get funds if I'm French?
afaik, they primarily support people, that are either swiss or
working/living in switzerla
se are going to be kept up-to-date by me.
roman
> Le 5 févr. 09 à 17:35, Roman Haefeli a écrit :
>
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Jack schrieb am Do, 5.2.2009:
> >
> >> Yep, as Roman says try [udpreceive] with [unpackOSC] (OSC
> >> comme often
>
--- Jack schrieb am Do, 5.2.2009:
> Yep, as Roman says try [udpreceive] with [unpackOSC] (OSC
> comme often
> 'on' UDP) or [tcpreceive] with [unpackOSC], if you
> want a service
> with connection. The choice depends if you absolutely need
> to receive
> your data.
> AFAIK, OSCx accepts o
--- mbutubuntu schrieb am Do, 5.2.2009:
> hello folks, I'm using OSC to send information from
> Processing to Pd...
> I started writing my "receiving" Patch in a
> Computer where was Installed
> Ubuntu 8.04 and Pd-extended 0.40.3 in stalled by the .deb
> package, my
> laptop was an Archlinu
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 17:13 +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> Hallo,
> Jack hat gesagt: // Jack wrote:
>
> > In fact with TCP, everything works fine (that the aim of this
> > protocol) with [until].
> > If it works with TCP, it should work with UDP (or i'm wrong).
>
> You are a little bit wrong:
hey ho
the subject line pretty much says it all.
have fun.
roman
___
Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail:
http://mail.yahoo.de
__
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 09:26 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> > On Jan 22, 2009, at 2:39 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> >
> >
> > I wasn't saying anything about GNU/Linux or Windows. I was talking
> > Mac OS X. .pd_darwin is all that is needed. .d_fat, etc
On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 13:46 +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> Martin Peach wrote:
> > a string of bytes, for transmission. I think [any2string] is intended
> > for purposes of serialization, to send data through a byte-oriented
> > channel such as a serial port, ethernet, or file.
>
> i always
On Sun, 2009-01-18 at 12:00 +, Florian Krebs wrote:
> Hello, I was trying a lot, but unfortunately I still don't get it
> compiled/linked...
>
> >i assume you got the aka.wiiremote sources via svn from
> >https://pure-data.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pure-data/trunk/externals/io/aka.wiiremot
hi all
although most of the users are not lurking on the list, i post it here
anyway: the netpd server (the machine, not the service) is currently
down due to harddisk failure. i hope to be able to fix it in the next
(hopefully) days or (hopefully not) weeks.
roman
___
--- Dafydd Hughes schrieb am Do, 15.1.2009:
> Von: Dafydd Hughes
> Betreff: Re: [PD] Pd, Arduino, and Multiple LED's == Installation?
> An: pd-list@iem.at
> Datum: Donnerstag, 15. Januar 2009, 15:12
> Hey Kyle
>
> Sounds like a really cool project.
>
> Are you sure you need any special hard
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 20:39 +0100, Arnaud Tanguy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Do you know a way to control VLC with Pure data?
>
> It seem to work by telnet but I'm a complete newbie for that.
> Somebody can help me?
you also can create network connections from puredata. there is
[netsend]/[netreceive]
call it a fake, but if you use a fixed-width font aka. monospaced font,
then you can simply calculate the overall width:
number of characters * character width = overall width
roman
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 16:04 +0100, bra...@subnet.at wrote:
> Hi all
>
> how is it possible to get the actual with
On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 18:34 +, Florian Hollerweger wrote:
> >> i never understood, why [timer] is giving different values from the ones
> >> that you expected, when connected to a [bang~] inside a re-blocked
> >> subpatch. would be cool to have that either explained or declared as a
> >> bug.
On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 12:23 -0500, carey dodge wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I recently installed pd-extended on my OSX 10.5 mac and i am
> trying to setup a patch using the oggcast~, oggamp~, etc. externals
> and it says that I don't have them.
>
try:
[pdogg/oggcast~] and [pdogg/oggamp~]
roman
On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 14:05 +0100, Peter Plessas wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Frank(ly), there is still something unclear to me. Please see below.
>
> Frank Barknecht wrote:
> > In general, Pd has like to times: One is the time realm of clock-delayed
> > messages, i.e. everything that originates in a c
On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 13:42 +0100, Peter Plessas wrote:
> I did this test with -audiobuf 50 running OSS.
> You are right, the values differ greatly on the kind of audio driver i
> am using, f.e. with alsa and -audiobuf 50 i get:
> print: 0.1
> print: 4.928
> print: 4.991
> print: 4.951
> print: 4
On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 12:26 +0100, Peter Plessas wrote:
>
> Timing is a very interesting topic in pd (and with computers in
> general). When i try to measure the [realtime] of a [metro 4] object, i get:
> print: 11.351
> print: 0.122
> print: 0.11
> print: 11.402
> print: 0.088
> print: 0.119
> p
hi all
FUDI was subject of a little discussion on #dataflow, so we tried to put
everything we could find togehter to a pdpedia page. however, all the
information was gained from some tests with [netreceive], but we
couldn't find any official specification nor what the acronym stands
for.
is the i
On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 22:52 +0100, David Schaffer wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm having troubles using the $0- thing in a abstraction
> containing two tabread4~ objects that have to keep their identity when
> several instances of the abstraction are oppened (I mean, not clash
> identities with t
On Tue, 2009-01-06 at 13:43 +0100, Peter Plessas wrote:
> Dear Frank, List
>
> thanks for that help! Yes indeed it works and i have been able of doing
> it with less objects and the help of bang~ as well.
> There is one thing i still don't get:
> I always thought pd would try to execute non-signa
On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 00:36 +0100, Patrice Colet wrote:
> I forgot to tell it's on win32, with 0.42 release
>
> Patrice Colet a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > the bug is easy to reproduce everytime:
> >
> > 1° open a patch
> > 2° modify something
> > 3° quit PureData
> > 4° Click "No"
> > 5° Try t
701 - 800 of 1744 matches
Mail list logo
