Ah but then if [change] used null by default, it wouldn't actually work by
default ... that seems far worse then the reasonable default of 0.
On Sep 23, 2013, at 10:19 PM, pd-list-requ...@iem.at wrote:
From: Mario Mey mario...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PD] [change] bug?
Date: September 23
...@gmail.com
*Subject:**Re: [PD] [change] bug?*
*Date:*September 23, 2013 6:55:36 PM CDT
*Cc:*pd-list pd-list@iem.at mailto:pd-list@iem.at
Well, if it is me... yes, I would like to have NULL as init value.
Dan Wilcox
@danomatika
danomatika.com http://danomatika.com
robotcowboy.com http
that's the way it works alright.
If your first value sent to it is zero, just initialize it with some other
value as the argument
cheers
2013/9/23 Mario Mey mario...@gmail.com
If i create [change] and send it a [0(, it outputs nothing. It seems like
it has already the 0 value initiated.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2013-09-23 17:45, Mario Mey wrote:
If i create [change] and send it a [0(, it outputs nothing.
yes
It seems like it has already the 0 value initiated.
yes.
I think [change] should not work like this...
i disagree.
[change] *always*
if you want a [change] that will always output its first value, regardless
of what it is, then you could set up a little thing like this attached patch
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 1:19 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.atwrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 2013-09-23
If i create [change] and send it a [0(, it outputs nothing. It seems
like it has already the 0 value initiated.
I think [change] should not work like this...
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
From: Alexandre Torres Porres por...@gmail.com
To: Mario Mey mario...@gmail.com
Cc: pd-list pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] [change] bug?
that's the way it works alright.
Yes. It's helpful to know that in Pure
fix (with [* -1]).
Thanks everyone.
El 23/09/13 15:45, Jonathan Wilkes escribió:
From: Alexandre Torres Porres por...@gmail.com
To: Mario Mey mario...@gmail.com
Cc: pd-list pd-list@iem.at
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] [change
On 23/09/13 20:45, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
You can make your own version of that by first sending a copy of the incoming
value through a
spigot:
[spigot 1]
|
[* -1]
|
[set $1(
|
[change]
Then set the right inlet of [spigot] to zero and send the incoming value to
your [change]
object, and it
El 23/09/13 21:22, yvan volochine escribió:
On 23/09/13 20:45, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
You can make your own version of that by first sending a copy of the
incoming value through a
spigot:
[spigot 1]
|
[* -1]
|
[set $1(
|
[change]
Then set the right inlet of [spigot] to zero and send the
-list@iem.at
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 12:13 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] [change] bug?
that's the way it works alright.
Yes. It's helpful to know that in Pure Data, an object that takes an
optional float argument
typically sets the value to zero if the user doesn't provide an
argument
On 09/23/2013 08:22 PM, yvan volochine wrote:
On 23/09/13 20:45, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
You can make your own version of that by first sending a copy of the
incoming value through a
spigot:
[spigot 1]
|
[* -1]
|
[set $1(
|
[change]
Then set the right inlet of [spigot] to zero and send the
12 matches
Mail list logo
