Hallo,
Andy Farnell hat gesagt: // Andy Farnell wrote:
Both for different reasons Chris, [pool] is an external I've had
problems compiling and getting to work consistently, and SSSAD
is overly complex imho.
Hm, really, but what is complex about having to just cross-connect a
slider like this:
Flute synthesis in PD: great!!!
Nicolas cited the work by
P. de La Quadra about flute sound synthesis:
is there any sample around?
Nicolas wrote:
I can handle the [orc-flute-1] object.
A month or two for the simple release...
What about the complex one ;-)? Joking, thanks,
for taking
this is exciting...!
re midi: for the little synths i've been building (for which, incidentally,
your 'six simple synths' provided very useful info) i made midi switchable.
if i want to i can use midi(notes) to generate pitches but by default it
just takes frequency--to get to those interesting
Okay, I found the last sssad I tried, and it's got a missing
part called _sssad/singleton
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 08:27:22 +0200
Frank Barknecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo,
Andy Farnell hat gesagt: // Andy Farnell wrote:
Both for different reasons Chris, [pool] is an external I've had
Hallo,
Andy Farnell hat gesagt: // Andy Farnell wrote:
Okay, I found the last sssad I tried, and it's got a missing
part called _sssad/singleton
It's included in the CVS here:
http://pure-data.cvs.sourceforge.net/pure-data/abstractions/footils/sssad/
Do you remember where you downloaded the
Cheers Frank, got singleton, but also needed to get [list_argument],
and [ssad-persistance]. I'm not sure why I had an incomplete copy before,
but anyway that's why I say complicated. Not complicated to use in theory.
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 13:43:10 +0200
Frank Barknecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hallo,
Kyle Klipowicz hat gesagt: // Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
IIRC, SSAD has a major dependancy with Frank's list-abs. If you have
those, it should work, right Frank?
No, SSSAD is completely standalone and doesn't require anything but
pd-0.39 or up. One of the S in its name stands for simplistic
maybe the oboe from andy's 'christchurch' track would be a good start:
http://obiwannabe.co.uk/html/compositions/compositions.html
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 18:40 +0900, hard off wrote:
maybe the oboe from andy's 'christchurch' track would be a good start:
http://obiwannabe.co.uk/html/compositions/compositions.html
Thanks, that looks pretty good, I'm always stealing stuff from Andy's
site, it's such a great resource.
It
I don't know well the toolkit in question, but I think in a way to
create a kind of orchestra, there should be at least two organised
categories:
- one devoted to physically modeled instrument, that allows complex
controls but sounds sometimes weird and are heavy to compute.
- one oriented
That's good. A solo or featured instrument might use an expensive
physical model, but cheaper methods for the backing instruments.
Maybe some kind of namespace could be started now [orc-flute],
[orc-cello] and so on. A coherent performance interface would
be a great start, something simple akin
Hallo,
Nicolas Montgermont hat gesagt: // Nicolas Montgermont wrote:
Andy Farnell a écrit :
That's good. A solo or featured instrument might use an expensive
physical model, but cheaper methods for the backing instruments.
Maybe some kind of namespace could be started now [orc-flute],
On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 02:12:50PM +0100, Andy Farnell wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:34:25 +0200
Frank Barknecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
factored out as well and become optional. Then a bit later on Memento
will marry SSSAD and they will have a child.
A great improvement Frank. Imho both
Both for different reasons Chris, [pool] is an external I've had
problems compiling and getting to work consistently, and SSSAD
is overly complex imho.
I think its great if a simple to use, intuitive, consistent
and completely intrinsic solution can be arrived at.
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 12:27:47
14 matches
Mail list logo
