Re: [PD] HRTF

2007-03-28 Thread Chuckk Hubbard
On 3/28/07, Chris McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 08:37:46PM -0400, Chuckk Hubbard wrote: Was PD previously under GPL? No. Frank explained to me that Pd-extended is under GPL. I have to go back and revise the package I created, if only to add the Berkley license

Re: [PD] HRTF

2007-03-28 Thread Chuckk Hubbard
On 3/28/07, Chris McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 10:50:11PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote: You can embed Pd into a proprietary software and apart from telling, that you did so, you have no further obligations (that's why Max can use parts of Pd inside). With

Re: [PD] HRTF

2007-03-28 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Chuckk Hubbard wrote: On 3/28/07, Chris McCormick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 08:37:46PM -0400, Chuckk Hubbard wrote: Was PD previously under GPL? No. Frank explained to me that Pd-extended is under GPL. I have to go back and revise the package I created, if only to

Re: [PD] HRTF

2007-03-27 Thread Piotr Majdak
Hi! Isidro Gonzalez wrote: Hi. I am looking for PD objects and/or abstractions to do HRTF filtering. Any ideas on where to get them? Take two FIR~s (from IEMlib, one for each ear), load the head related impulse responses as filters in the tables and filter a monaural signal. The only

Re: [PD] HRTF

2007-03-27 Thread Chuckk Hubbard
Pd people continue to ignore Csound, and Csound people continue to ignore Pd, despite the great power of combining them. I can't help feeling like this is a symptom of being more interested in some intellectual problem than in using all of the available tools to make music. Not seeing the forest

Re: [PD] HRTF

2007-03-27 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Chuckk Hubbard wrote: Pd people continue to ignore Csound, and Csound people continue to ignore Pd, despite the great power of combining them. I can't help feeling like this is a symptom of being more interested in some intellectual problem than in using all of the available tools to make

Re: [PD] HRTF

2007-03-27 Thread padawan12
I'd love to hear work that comes out of a combination of Csound and Pd I think both are great, just different. Something I feel very strongly about though, are there still 'licensing issues' with Csound or has it shaken off all it's encumberances and become a totally free OS codebase? On Tue,

Re: [PD] HRTF

2007-03-27 Thread adam armfield
Something I feel very strongly about though, are there still 'licensing issues' with Csound or has it shaken off all it's encumberances and become a totally free OS codebase? -- i heard john ffitch (head csound bloke, and a professor at bath uni) do a talk a couple of years

Re: [PD] HRTF

2007-03-27 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Chuckk Hubbard hat gesagt: // Chuckk Hubbard wrote: I believe Csound is under LGPL, and if I understand correctly the main difference is that people who use parts of it in commercial applications are not required to keep their source open. Someone else will know better, but to my

Re: [PD] HRTF

2007-03-27 Thread Chuckk Hubbard
Was PD previously under GPL? I published my Pd patch together with copies of Pd, zexy, cyclone, and toxy, and the only license file I could find in my Pd folder was GPL. I meant this in exactly the sense you are saying, but I wasn't aware Pd was under the Berkley License. So after software has

Re: [PD] HRTF

2007-03-27 Thread Chris McCormick
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 08:37:46PM -0400, Chuckk Hubbard wrote: Was PD previously under GPL? No. So after software has been released under a license, it is possible to retroactively change the license? Sounds strange to me. If you are the copyright holder, you can do whatever you want. In

Re: [PD] HRTF

2007-03-27 Thread Chris McCormick
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 10:50:11PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote: You can embed Pd into a proprietary software and apart from telling, that you did so, you have no further obligations (that's why Max can use parts of Pd inside). With Csound this is not allowed I must disagree with this; I

[PD] HRTF

2007-03-20 Thread Isidro Gonzalez
Hi. I am looking for PD objects and/or abstractions to do HRTF filtering. Any ideas on where to get them? Thanks Isi It's here! Your new message! Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.

Re: [PD] HRTF

2007-03-20 Thread Chuckk Hubbard
Interesting idea. Only thing I could suggest would be to use Csound with Pd's csoundapi~ object. You could totally set up an interface for setting angles and stuff with GEM, then relay the HRTF info to Csound. It would be pretty awesome. I wouldn't know where to start trying to set up HRTF just

Re: [PD] HRTF

2007-03-20 Thread Georg Holzmann
Hallo! I am looking for PD objects and/or abstractions to do HRTF filtering. Any ideas on where to get them? 2 possibilities: - use the earplug~ external (in cvs/externals/earplug~) - use binaural ambisonic I am just making some workshop patches on how to do that for the linux audio

Re: [PD] HRTF

2007-03-20 Thread Luigi Rensinghoff
I am not sure if that works too, but what about partconv~ . shouldnt it be possible with that too ? You have to build a lot around it i guess luigi Am 20.03.2007 um 17:03 schrieb Georg Holzmann: Hallo! I am looking for PD objects and/or abstractions to do HRTF filtering. Any ideas on