Re: [PD] List header (Was: Re: [PD-announce] Proof Me! PD FLOSS Manual)

2008-05-13 Thread Steffen Juul
On 12/05/2008, at 23.40, Frank Barknecht wrote: Maybe you want to change that as well while you're at it Good idea. - with an advance warning so I can adapt my filter in time. Alternatively you could make your filter look for list-id in 'List- ID: [phrase] list-id ' instead of (part of)

Re: [PD] List header (Was: Re: [PD-announce] Proof Me! PD FLOSS Manual)

2008-05-12 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, IOhannes m zmölnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: if nobody objects within the next week, i will change the subject-prefix from [PD] to [Pd] (and accordingly) on all Pd-related mailinglists. Personally I filter by List-Id: but currently this is referring to PureData which also

Re: [PD] List header (Was: Re: [PD-announce] Proof Me! PD FLOSS Manual)

2008-05-09 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
Steffen Juul wrote: On 07/05/2008, at 9.54, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: Derek Holzer wrote: 4) Grammar/spelling, of course Miller refers to Pd rather than PD, shouldn't this canonical form be used? (which reminds me, that even the header of this list says [PD] :-|) Oh dear. Any chance

Re: [PD] List header (Was: Re: [PD-announce] Proof Me! PD FLOSS Manual)

2008-05-09 Thread Roman Haefeli
changing the mail filters shouldn't be too hard ;-) i'd say, if you announce it again just before you do it, everyone should be fine. roman On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 08:55 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: Steffen Juul wrote: On 07/05/2008, at 9.54, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: Derek

Re: [PD] List header (Was: Re: [PD-announce] Proof Me! PD FLOSS Manual)

2008-05-09 Thread Steffen Juul
On 09/05/2008, at 11.27, Roman Haefeli wrote: changing the mail filters shouldn't be too hard ;-) And why filter list-mail by subject? I might miss an obvious reason, thats why i ask. ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and

Re: [PD] List header (Was: Re: [PD-announce] Proof Me! PD FLOSS Manual)

2008-05-09 Thread marius schebella
IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: Steffen Juul wrote: On 07/05/2008, at 9.54, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: Derek Holzer wrote: 4) Grammar/spelling, of course Miller refers to Pd rather than PD, shouldn't this canonical form be used? (which reminds me, that even the header of this list says [PD] :-|)

Re: [PD] List header (Was: Re: [PD-announce] Proof Me! PD FLOSS Manual)

2008-05-09 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote: I am more worried about spam filters of they are case sensitive, I had to train my mail programs (gmail [please don't shout at me...] and thunderbird), because some of the pd mails went to spam. maybe you can send out a testmail

[PD] List header (Was: Re: [PD-announce] Proof Me! PD FLOSS Manual)

2008-05-08 Thread Steffen Juul
On 07/05/2008, at 9.54, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: Derek Holzer wrote: 4) Grammar/spelling, of course Miller refers to Pd rather than PD, shouldn't this canonical form be used? (which reminds me, that even the header of this list says [PD] :-|) Oh dear. Any chance of changing that