On Jun 26, 2011, at 1:17 PM, august wrote:
Hans,
are the 'upstream' and 'pristine-tar' naming conventions of debian?
do you have branches for the tarballs?
These branches are Debian naming conventions that the git-buildpackage
tools handle for you with tools like
Hans,
are the 'upstream' and 'pristine-tar' naming conventions of debian?
do you have branches for the tarballs?
What is a pristine-tar ?
I'd like to learn the packaging stuff, so I will try to go through
the process myself. Maybe I can solicit your
Cool, I think this then means that libpd bindings for python, etc. can
be also packaged up. Once this package is ready, I'm happy to take it
thru the Debian submission process via pkg-multimedia and get it into
Debian. Or even better, you can easily do it yourself via pkg-
multimedia
okay, here is a test package of the libpd git repo.
I think it would be safe to merge the Makefile and the libpd.pc into
upstream.
please have a look:
https://launchpad.net/~august-alien/+archive/ppa
best -august.
I suggest you stick to the central repository of libpd because you
I suggest you stick to the central repository of libpd because you can
expect it to be actively maintained and documented. If other repositories
contain material that you'd like to see in the main branch, you can create a
merge request at Gitorious.
Cheers,
Peter
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2011-06-22 05:47, august wrote:
Is there a version number for libpd?
I see you guys have added a pd.pc in
http://gitorious.org/~aalex/pdlib/aalexs-libpd
just to chime in: please note that pd also provides a pd.pc.
i would highly
I agree that we should provide a libpd.pc. Let's aim to fold this into the
main branch of the libpd repository. If the PPA ends up using code from
aalex, let's merge that into the main branch as well.
A related question is whether this is the time to declare the libpd API
finished, but that's a
well, I just made my first PPA. It's waiting to build on launchpad.
I have the Makefile copy pd.pc to libpd.pc. libpd.pc is then installed
instead of pd.pc
Not sure if I should be using the aalex repo or not. What are the
differences?
I don't think the API needs to be fixed for this
Has someone already made a PPA for libpd?
If not, I might have a go.
-august.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
I haven't seen one, I say go!
.hc
On Jun 21, 2011, at 6:26 PM, august wrote:
Has someone already made a PPA for libpd?
If not, I might have a go.
-august.
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
Is there a version number for libpd?
I see you guys have added a pd.pc in
http://gitorious.org/~aalex/pdlib/aalexs-libpd
should I use pdlib git repo or aalexs repo?
I haven't seen one, I say go!
.hc
On Jun 21, 2011, at 6:26 PM, august wrote:
Has someone already made a PPA
11 matches
Mail list logo
