hi
i don't know to which mail you are answering, but i still believe, that
pd's [metro] is absolute accurate (even sub-sample-accurate), when used
in combination with [vline~] for example.
the only case, where it could be considered inaccurate, is when cpu-load
is too high, though when writing
If you're worried by metro's irregularity then you should use Eric Lyons' samm~
(sample accurate multiple metronomes). This is described in
http://www.sarc.qub.ac.uk/~elyon/LyonPapers/SampleAccurate-Lyon-ICMC2006.pdf
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
