you want, use
[line~]
|
[*~ (the size of your range)]
|
[+~ (the lower limit of your range)]
--
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:10:47 +0100
From: pimas...@gmail.com
To: samueldavidr...@hotmail.co.uk
CC: pd-list@iem.at
Subject: Re: [PD] Simple Subtractive Synth
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 07:04:46AM +0100, Ingo wrote:
as an alternative to [phasor~] you could try either [creb/blosc~ saw] or the
one Roman Haefeli just suggested:
If you're after a cheap band-limited saw generator, check this out:
https://github.com/reduzent/pd-bloscabs
It's pure
Hi
Thanks for the help with the filter envelope I was trying to make, I have
decided to use the method Pierre suggested as it allows me to alter the
envelope by dragging my mouse, and it makes more sense than the v-line method
at this moment in time, although I will also give that a try.
I am
Hi Samuel,
probably the bandlimited oscillator BLOSC objects in the creb library,
or the spliced-transition method found in the Pd help files or Miller's
book would be the best things, however I have also included a chapter in
the FLOSS Manual on using the sinsum message to create rudimentary
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 17:06 +0100, Derek Holzer wrote:
Hi Samuel,
probably the bandlimited oscillator BLOSC objects in the creb library,
or the spliced-transition method found in the Pd help files or Miller's
book would be the best things, however I have also included a chapter in
the
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 05:27:58PM +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 17:06 +0100, Derek Holzer wrote:
The spliced-transition method is particularly interesting for making
anti-aliased pulse waveforms with dynamically adjustable pulse width.
The [s_osc] object in rj
Much better at low frequencies, where saw is often used
synthetically for bass sounds.
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 17:52:15 +0100
Frank Barknecht f...@footils.org wrote:
Bandlimiting is made with spliced transitions which according to my personal
taste sounds phatter than the sinesum approach.
--
[tabosc4~].
Ingo
Von: samuel rowe [mailto:samueldavidr...@hotmail.co.uk]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. November 2010 00:39
An: i...@miamiwave.com
Betreff: RE: AW: [PD] Simple Subtractive Synth filter envelope
Hi Ingo
Thanks for the help, I've been a bit busy today
Hi
I'm relatively new to PD, but I've been working with hardware synthesizers for
years now, and I've used SynC to build synths on my computer, and I'm doing an
Audio Technology degree, so I'm not clueless on the subject.
However, I'm trying to build a simple subtractive synth where I press a
On 22/11/10 21:48, samuel rowe wrote:
an envelope generator with ADSR
vline~ is your friend here:
1 10, 0.5 100 10, 0 1000 2000
|
[vline~]
|
[*~]\[osc~ 666]
|
[dac~]
the output will not feed into the argument for a filter cutoff value.
right. you can't connect signal outlets to message
Would this do?
You should be aware that there is a difference between message and audio
inlets (different color). The sound may be very diffrent depending on the
type of inlet an audio object has if you want to change a parameter
dynamically. This is particularly relevant for filters. Check the
. to convert the audio 0 - 1 to a range you want, use
[line~]
|[*~ (the size of your range)]|[+~ (the lower limit of your range)]
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:10:47 +0100
From: pimas...@gmail.com
To: samueldavidr...@hotmail.co.uk
CC: pd-list@iem.at
Subject: Re: [PD] Simple Subtractive Synth filter envelope
--- On Mon, 11/22/10, Claude Heiland-Allen claudiusmaxi...@goto10.org wrote:
From: Claude Heiland-Allen claudiusmaxi...@goto10.org
Subject: Re: [PD] Simple Subtractive Synth filter envelope
To: pd-list@iem.at
Date: Monday, November 22, 2010, 11:09 PM
On 22/11/10 21:48, samuel rowe
wrote
...@iem.at] Im Auftrag von
Andrew Faraday
Gesendet: Montag, 22. November 2010 23:36
An: pimas...@gmail.com; samueldavidr...@hotmail.co.uk
Cc: pd-list@iem.at
Betreff: Re: [PD] Simple Subtractive Synth filter envelope
hello samuel
[vcf~] is probably the way to go.
you can also cheat a little using [envgen
14 matches
Mail list logo
