2012/3/9 Mathieu Bouchard
> I meant myself, for example - and everyone who doesn't do Pd fulltime,
thus cannot really afford to learn using the more complicated
parts/methods. So to say, the barriers to entry shall be kept low.
>>>
> Nearly none of the Pd professionals use Pd «fu
I meant myself, for example - and everyone who doesn't do Pd fulltime,
thus cannot really afford to learn using the more complicated
parts/methods. So to say, the barriers to entry shall be kept low.
Nearly none of the Pd professionals use Pd «fulltime».
Yeah. The question is, do you underst
2012/3/9 Mathieu Bouchard
> Le 2012-03-09 à 17:08:00, András Murányi a écrit :
>
>
> I meant myself, for example - and everyone who doesn't do Pd fulltime,
>> thus cannot really afford to learn using the more complicated
>> parts/methods. So to say, the barriers to entry shall be kept low.
>>
>
Le 2012-03-09 à 17:08:00, András Murányi a écrit :
I meant myself, for example - and everyone who doesn't do Pd fulltime,
thus cannot really afford to learn using the more complicated
parts/methods. So to say, the barriers to entry shall be kept low.
Nearly none of the Pd professionals use Pd
2012/3/9 alex
> 2012/3/9 András Murányi :
> > I can see your point concerning O'reilly and even with libpd but I'm
> > convinced the threat is far from the need
> > of four-letter words. Pd's editing and programming features shall stay
> open
> > and continue to support the less professional and
2012/3/9 András Murányi :
> I can see your point concerning O'reilly and even with libpd but I'm
> convinced the threat is far from the need
> of four-letter words. Pd's editing and programming features shall stay open
> and continue to support the less professional and then all will be good.
What
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 10:42, Julian Brooks wrote:
>
> Just sent this to the eightycolumn list. I'm not going to even read any
> of the messages from the original post. I'm Sorry, ok.
>
>
> Oh dear...
>
>
> "I am guessing you are pointing to the fact that libpd encourages the
> production of pr
the problem with cigarettes is being able to make your own.
the same thing applies on software, as i see.
2012/3/9 mark edward grimm
> > long as you don't smoke too many
>
> One is to many and a thousand is never enough.
>
>
>
> On Mar 9, 2012, at 7:55 AM, i go bananas wrote:
>
> > smoking is
> long as you don't smoke too many
One is to many and a thousand is never enough.
On Mar 9, 2012, at 7:55 AM, i go bananas wrote:
> smoking isn't really THAT bad. as long as you don't smoke too many, it just
> raises your odds on diseases that have pretty low odds anyway,
>
>
> __
smoking isn't really THAT bad. as long as you don't smoke too many, it
just raises your odds on diseases that have pretty low odds anyway,
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Just sent this to the eightycolumn list. I'm not going to even read any of
the messages from the original post. I'm Sorry, ok.
Oh dear...
"I am guessing you are pointing to the fact that libpd encourages the
production of proprietary software and their distribution on closed apps
markets?"
11 matches
Mail list logo
