Re: [PD] agenda for upcoming book sprint?[GEM sprint]

2009-03-29 Thread Derek Holzer
OK, then this needs to be added to the install instructions. D. Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: On Mar 28, 2009, at 10:01 AM, chris clepper wrote: On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 6:10 AM, Derek Holzer de...@umatic.nl mailto:de...@umatic.nl wrote: side note to HC: is X11 a prerequisite for

Re: [PD] agenda for upcoming book sprint?[GEM sprint]

2009-03-28 Thread adam hyde
hey I can document pdp/pidip installation. it contains the packages i have used the most so happy to help if you think its within the scope of the manual Derek. It might be however, that we should focus first on the basics. One issue that might prevent this is if we get too ambitious for this

Re: [PD] agenda for upcoming book sprint?[GEM sprint]

2009-03-28 Thread chris clepper
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 6:10 AM, Derek Holzer de...@umatic.nl wrote: side note to HC: is X11 a prerequisite for GEM on OSX Pd Extended now? I saw some people at my last workshop had some missing libs with newer Pd Extended installers... Nothing in the GEM code relies on X11, but I

Re: [PD] agenda for upcoming book sprint?[GEM sprint]

2009-03-28 Thread chris clepper
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:01 AM, chris clepper cgclep...@gmail.com wrote: Nothing in the GEM code relies on X11, That should read 'Nothing in the GEM OSX code relies on X11'. Obviously, Linux uses X11 for window and event handling. ___

Re: [PD] agenda for upcoming book sprint?[GEM sprint]

2009-03-28 Thread ydego...@gmail.com
ola, 3) PiDiP could be more complicated, as it requires specific versions of Quicktime and perhaps some other libs, IIRC. not true, it uses libquicktime like PDP and so if you have it installed with PDP it's ok, and it uses LibQuicktime only for the camera input like Gem, so i never heard of

Re: [PD] agenda for upcoming book sprint?[GEM sprint]

2009-03-28 Thread Derek Holzer
Thanks for clarification. I remembered different issues coming up on the list before, thus these concerns. D. ydego...@gmail.com wrote: ola, 3) PiDiP could be more complicated, as it requires specific versions of Quicktime and perhaps some other libs, IIRC. not true, it uses libquicktime

Re: [PD] agenda for upcoming book sprint?[GEM sprint]

2009-03-28 Thread ydego...@gmail.com
ola, to make it even clearer, 2 persons ( lluis gomez i bigorda and sergi lario ) keep developping some things for pdp/pidip, and also for gem, like the opencv bindings for pd that you might see in pd convention : http://www.hangar.org/wikis/lab/doku.php?id=start:puredata_opencv but they are

Re: [PD] agenda for upcoming book sprint?[GEM sprint]

2009-03-28 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Mar 28, 2009, at 10:01 AM, chris clepper wrote: On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 6:10 AM, Derek Holzer de...@umatic.nl wrote: side note to HC: is X11 a prerequisite for GEM on OSX Pd Extended now? I saw some people at my last workshop had some missing libs with newer Pd Extended

Re: [PD] agenda for upcoming book sprint?[GEM sprint]

2009-03-27 Thread ydego...@gmail.com
that's where the joke is, that floss manuals cover software that should also run on windows yes, you've always been a joker man, you know that xiaoo, sevy Derek Holzer wrote: Hi guys, As the facilitator of this project, I will post a list of sprint targets quite soon. GEM section is

Re: [PD] agenda for upcoming book sprint?[GEM sprint]

2009-03-27 Thread ydego...@gmail.com
ydego...@gmail.com wrote: that's where the joke is, that floss manuals cover software that should also run on windows yes, you've always been a joker man, you know that sorry i that seemed agressive, i just meant you're a reactionary force, cos don't document ardour, supercollider and others

Re: [PD] agenda for upcoming book sprint?[GEM sprint]

2009-03-27 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
I think we definitely should document PDP/PiDIP and Gridflow as well. Do you want to participate and help out? If there aren't any PDP or Gridflow people joining in, then I think it makes the most sense to focus on Gem since it is the most widespread. .hc On Mar 27, 2009, at 12:56 AM,

Re: [PD] agenda for upcoming book sprint?[GEM sprint]

2009-03-27 Thread Derek Holzer
My thoughts exactly...document what people actually use most, in a way which helps them to use it. As I said, if someone wants to go through all the trouble of making a separate install guide for PDP or Gridflow, I'd consider including it. As it stands, however, both of these can change at

Re: [PD] agenda for upcoming book sprint?[GEM sprint]

2009-03-27 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
For what its worth, PDP/PiDiP has been included in Mac OS X and GNU/ Linux Pd-extended since 0.39.3, so no compilation instructions needed. We do still need someone to write the docs. I don't think I know enough to write more than a paragraph. Same goes with Gridflow, in my book. .hc

Re: [PD] agenda for upcoming book sprint?[GEM sprint]

2009-03-26 Thread Derek Holzer
Hi guys, As the facilitator of this project, I will post a list of sprint targets quite soon. GEM section is definitely on my list, however I do want to keep to things which are both included in PD-Extended and are cross platform. For now, this excludes PDP and Gridflow. Maybe if someone wanted

[PD] agenda for upcoming book sprint?

2009-03-25 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Hey all, I hope I am not jumping the gun or stepping on anyone's toes. I just wanted to open up the discussion about what people are planning on working on during the upcoming book sprint. Currently, I am pretty open to topics, but I was thinking that Gem/PDP/Gridflow could really use

Re: [PD] agenda for upcoming book sprint?

2009-03-25 Thread marius schebella
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Hey all, I hope I am not jumping the gun or stepping on anyone's toes. I just wanted to open up the discussion about what people are planning on working on during the upcoming book sprint. Currently, I am pretty open to topics, but I was thinking that