Re: [PD] another basic pd question/creation arguments in abstraction

2007-10-18 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Roman Haefeli wrote: [list $1] - allows both, symbols and floats shouldn't this be [list append $1]? mfgasd.r IOhannes ___ PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] another basic pd question/creation arguments in abstraction

2007-10-18 Thread Atte André Jensen
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: [list $1] - allows both, symbols and floats shouldn't this be [list append $1]? I tried both and both seem to work. There might be some situations where the append make a difference, though... -- peace, love harmony Atte http://atte.dk |

Re: [PD] another basic pd question/creation arguments in abstraction

2007-10-18 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote: there is no mechanism in pd, that allows you to check, whether a certain argument for an abstraction was specified or not. when a certain argument is not given, pd just assumes '0'. if '0' is not part of your intended argument range,

Re: [PD] another basic pd question/creation arguments in abstraction

2007-10-18 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Atte André Jensen hat gesagt: // Atte André Jensen wrote: What can I do then about audio rate inlets? Inlets (sig and control) and arguments aren't related in any predefined way. Obviously you cannot pass signals itself as arguments, only symbols and numbers are possible, so any

Re: [PD] another basic pd question/creation arguments in abstraction

2007-10-18 Thread Roman Haefeli
yo, hi frank and IOhannes On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 08:04 +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote: [loadbang] | [list $1] - allows both, symbols and floats [list append $1] - allows both, symbols and floats On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 09:21 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: shouldn't this be [list

[PD] another basic pd question/creation arguments in abstraction

2007-10-17 Thread Atte André Jensen
Hi Still a lot to learn... With the attached patch as an example, how do I make it possible to use the numbers 2000, 4000 and 5200 a creations arguments, but still use the said numbers as defaults, should no arguments be supplied? Confused at a very basic level, unfortunately :-) I seem to

Re: [PD] another basic pd question/creation arguments in abstraction

2007-10-17 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 02:44 +0200, Atte André Jensen wrote: Hi Still a lot to learn... With the attached patch as an example, how do I make it possible to use the numbers 2000, 4000 and 5200 a creations arguments, but still use the said numbers as defaults, should no arguments be