Re: [PD] dc_blocker

2008-12-29 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Frank Barknecht hat gesagt: // Frank Barknecht wrote: > You could also do this by implementing the transfer function directly > using rzero~ and rpole~, see attached. But generally a [hip~ 5] is > good as well. Ups, in the example patch, the [hip~ 5] should be after the [sig~] of course.

Re: [PD] dc_blocker

2008-12-29 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Steffen Leve Poulsen hat gesagt: // Steffen Leve Poulsen wrote: > FYI and as APOC a dc-blocker as suggested by Josh You could also do this by implementing the transfer function directly using rzero~ and rpole~, see attached. But generally a [hip~ 5] is good as well. Ciao -- Frank Barkn

[PD] dc_blocker

2008-12-29 Thread Steffen Leve Poulsen
Hi all FYI and as APOC a dc-blocker as suggested by Josh peace/slp #N canvas 122 23 416 538 10; #X text 11 35 y(n) = x(n) - x(n-1) + R*y(n-1); #X obj 18 269 outlet~; #X obj 19 170 inlet~; #X text 11 8 http://www.dsprelated.com/dspbooks/filters/DC_Blocker.html ; #X obj 188 104 bang~; #X obj 18 13