Hallo,
Mathieu Bouchard hat gesagt: // Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
By emphasising $1,2,3,4 it makes $5 that much more difficult and
especially it makes it boring. At least if you're writing tricky
documentation and you don't like writing documentation you can have
a sense that you're doing
On Wed, 20 Jun 2007, Frank Barknecht wrote:
You mean like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decorator_pattern ?
(original page at http://www.c2.com/cgi/wiki?DecoratorPattern )
Yes, I meant it as a reference to that design pattern, but more to the
problem it tries to solve
Well, IMHO, a pattern is
Hallo,
Mathieu Bouchard hat gesagt: // Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
But actually I'm trying to not to propose anything at all at this stage.
why?
Basically what I (and Roman as well, as I understand) want to achieve
ATM is just a collection of documented abstractions. What to do with
these
A bridge with automated service discovery could be nice, but I fear that
it may also be too much bureaucracy and in the end may not help,
I would especially like to say, beware of the bureaucracy and anything
that looks like it. It has to do with what the values of pd are:
$1 = nice
