Re: [PD] freeverb and denormals

2009-11-15 Thread Ivica Ico Bukvic
> > It appears that current iteration of freeverb~ is susceptible to denormals > > bug. Namely, feeding silence after sound hogs cpu (I chuckled by > reading > > Pd's CPU footprint which was in excess of 400%). Adding a tiniest > amount of > > DC bias inside Pd solves this but I wonder shouldn't th

Re: [PD] freeverb and denormals

2009-11-15 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote: It appears that current iteration of freeverb~ is susceptible to denormals bug. Namely, feeding silence after sound hogs cpu (I chuckled by reading Pd's CPU footprint which was in excess of 400%). Adding a tiniest amount of DC bias inside Pd solves th

[PD] freeverb and denormals

2009-11-15 Thread Ivica Ico Bukvic
It appears that current iteration of freeverb~ is susceptible to denormals bug. Namely, feeding silence after sound hogs cpu (I chuckled by reading Pd's CPU footprint which was in excess of 400%). Adding a tiniest amount of DC bias inside Pd solves this but I wonder shouldn't this be simply added t