Hello all,
So I'm getting my feet wet in digital circuitry this quarter at my
university and I've got numerous projects I want to waste my time on, one of
them being a simple ring mod effect in the same vein as the ring mod found
here: http://en.flossmanuals.net/PureData/AmplitudeModulation
My
On Thu, 3 Feb 2011, Tyler Leavitt wrote:
My question is what would be the hardware equivalent of the [*~] object.
I guess it don't have to be digital... even an analog equivalent would
help me understand it better.
Isn't the transistor related to [*~] ?
But it depends which case of [*~], I
You're looking for a balanced modulator. The MC1496 is one.
The original ring modulator used a ring of 4 diodes between two transformers.
Running two pulse waves into an AND gate will give a binary version.
Martin
Hello all,
So I'm getting my feet wet in digital circuitry this quarter at
February, 2011 22:07:46
Subject: [PD] hardware implementation of [*~]
Hello all,
So I'm getting my feet wet in digital circuitry this quarter at my university
and I've got numerous projects I want to waste my time on, one of them being a
simple ring mod effect in the same vein as the ring mod found
--
*From:* Tyler Leavitt thecryofl...@gmail.com
*To:* pd-list pd-list@iem.at
*Sent:* Thu, 3 February, 2011 22:07:46
*Subject:* [PD] hardware implementation of [*~]
Hello all,
So I'm getting my feet wet in digital circuitry this quarter at my
university and I've got numerous
You want it to be bipolar for both signal
and modulator domains.
So that:
+1 * +1 = +1
-1 * +1 = -1
+1 * -1 = -1
-1 * -1 = +1
A linear biased transistor and most simple op-amp
circuits can't give you this. Hence the need for
something like the CA3080 transconductance circuit.
If you
I built an analog multiplier module out of the AD633. Datasheet has many
other mathematical functions. See here:
http://macumbista.net/?p=1314
Best,
D.
On 2/3/11 11:07 PM, Tyler Leavitt wrote:
My question is what would be the hardware equivalent of the [*~] object.
I guess it don't have to
