On 11/09/2007, at 16.54, Georg Holzmann wrote:
> But these changes are only in the latest pd-extended which is not
> released yet ...
...which means that it (iemmatrix) can be snapped out of nightly
builds of Pd-0.40.3-extended for max osx i386.
http://autobuild.puredata.info/auto-build/2007-
Hallo!
>> but even in the old autobuilds there is no iemmatrix.
>> Is it called matrix instead of iemmatrix? or is it stripped into single
>> objects (mtx_and...).
>
> i don't know.
> iemmatrix can be build as single object collection, so it is pd-extended
> ready.
> i will not add it, but i t
marius schebella wrote:
>
> Is there a reason why they are not in the nightly autobuilds? I
> recognized, that the macintel autobuilds stopped on aug 31st.
this is most likely due to vanished hardware (but i guess, that you know
that better than me)
> but even in the old autobuilds there is no
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
> most likely, because the iemmatrix.pd_darwin you are trying to load has
> been compiled for powerpc and not for macintel.
[...]
> since there are no macintel autobuilds, you might just want to go and
> compile it yourself.
Is there a reason why they are not in the ni
punchik punchik wrote:
> /Applications/pd/Pd-0.39.2-extended-test7.app/Contents/Resources/extra/iemmatrix.pd_darwin:
> mach-o, but wrong architecture
>
> do anybody know why i got this message and how to fix
> this?
most likely, because the iemmatrix.pd_darwin you are trying to load has
been co
hi, where can i find iemmatrix compiled for macosx
intel?
ive tried the one from here:
http://www.netpd.org/Iemmatrix
but when i load it i got this message
/Applications/pd/Pd-0.39.2-extended-test7.app/Contents/Resources/extra/iemmatrix.pd_darwin:
dlopen(/Applications/pd/Pd-0.39.2-extended-test7
