Re: [PD] installing netpd under gentoo using layman error maxlib

2007-11-20 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
The Pd-extended Makefiles do use DESTDIR, CFLAGS, etc. but are only somewhat hierarchical. That stuff could be greatly improved for sure. Patches welcome :D I think that it autoconf/config.h should be the technique for handling libs and other dependencies. Perhaps automake would be use

Re: [PD] installing netpd under gentoo using layman error maxlib

2007-11-20 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>> also there is acouple of external which have duplicated objects. >> what do you mean here? >> nameclashes? duplicated functionality? aliases? > yeah ..i can't remenber, but when i used my strategy: > #' > foreach pde (`find -iname '*.pd_linux'`) > ln -s $pde /opt/audi

Re: [PD] installing netpd under gentoo using layman error maxlib

2007-11-20 Thread errordeveloper
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 01:56:19PM +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> the Makefiles in the pd CVS tree are very are definetly not good. >> they needs fixing globaly. >> who is responsible for the CVS ? > > nobody. > the authors are responsible for their stuff. > so: if

Re: [PD] installing netpd under gentoo using layman error maxlib

2007-11-20 Thread errordeveloper
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 04:59:18PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > heh, it would be a definitely GOOD THING to tidy up our build systems. > > but HOW? > i think of having one Makeglobal which will contain DESTDIR, CFALGS , *FLAGS ..etc all the general variebles.. and procedures (or how do yo

Re: [PD] installing netpd under gentoo using layman error maxlib

2007-11-20 Thread mescalinum
> the Makefiles in the pd CVS tree are very are definetly not good. > they needs fixing globaly. > > who is responsible for the CVS ? > > i think that all of them have to be generalised ,so we can easiely build > anything. > > i do everything manually on my system, > cause quite a few makefiles try

Re: [PD] installing netpd under gentoo using layman error maxlib

2007-11-20 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > the Makefiles in the pd CVS tree are very are definetly not good. > they needs fixing globaly. > > who is responsible for the CVS ? nobody. the authors are responsible for their stuff. so: if zexy/src/Makefile is broken, it is my fault... > > i think that all of them

Re: [PD] installing netpd under gentoo using layman error maxlib

2007-11-20 Thread errordeveloper
the Makefiles in the pd CVS tree are very are definetly not good. they needs fixing globaly. who is responsible for the CVS ? i think that all of them have to be generalised ,so we can easiely build anything. i do everything manually on my system, cause quite a few makefiles try to use -m32 in C

Re: [PD] installing netpd under gentoo using layman error maxlib

2007-11-20 Thread mescalinum
> so what you got there with /usr/lib/pd and doc/ in there ?? > who does that belong to to whatever ..check it out and emerge --resume > then .. no way-.- > ah, seems you got FEATURES=userpriv - so you might diasable thet .. but > seems actually this a bug in the ebuild , it shouldn't try making

Re: [PD] installing netpd under gentoo using layman error maxlib

2007-11-20 Thread errordeveloper
so what you got there with /usr/lib/pd and doc/ in there ?? who does that belong to to whatever ..check it out and emerge --resume then .. ah, seems you got FEATURES=userpriv - so you might diasable thet .. but seems actually this a bug in the ebuild , it shouldn't try making that directory at 'i

[PD] installing netpd under gentoo using layman error maxlib

2007-11-19 Thread alejo d
hi federico; i, here trying the overlay for the first time tx for all those ebuilds! have to say that the instructions for building pd under gentoo from this page by Nano Dust worked prefectly: http://puredata.info/Members/nanodust/pd-extended-gentoo/?searchterm=gentoo but when trying netpd i ge