Re: [PD] is Gem working in 0.43.1 Pd-extended for Linux?

2011-10-10 Thread Charles Goyard
Hi, sorry, it seems you did not encounter the same problem as I did. My problem is that gem would not load at all (with a undefined symbol error from the dynamic linker loader). You could try increasing the log level and see if there's anything on console output. I don't understand your

Re: [PD] is Gem working in 0.43.1 Pd-extended for Linux?

2011-10-10 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
I don't understand your statement about /usr/lib/, /pd and /pd-extended... I was talking about pd-extended source tree. Do you source compile it or get it as a binary ? I sorted it out now. i updated the synaptic package manager repository links and downloaded 0.42.5 pd-extended and edited

[PD] is Gem working in 0.43.1 Pd-extended for Linux?

2011-10-09 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
I have been pulling my locks out for 2 day trying to configure 0.43.1 to run in puredyne. every thing works except Gem. I have linked to the pd folder, i have downloaded the latest version of Gem and installed it, to no avail. every once in a while, it will render [gemhead] and no other Gem

Re: [PD] is Gem working in 0.43.1 Pd-extended for Linux?

2011-10-09 Thread Charles Goyard
o...@onyx-ashanti.com wrote: I have been pulling my locks out for 2 day trying to configure 0.43.1 to run in puredyne. every thing works except Gem. Hi, yes it does, but there's a trick. You have to edit the pd-extended/packages/linux_make/Makefile and comment out the OPT_CFLAGS +=

Re: [PD] is Gem working in 0.43.1 Pd-extended for Linux?

2011-10-09 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
thanks for getting back to me. on my system there are two pd folders in /usr/lib. /pd and /pd-extended. the pd-extended doesnt have a /packages folder whereas the /pd folder does. i found and commented the line you mentioned to no avail. same issue. yes it does, but there's a trick. You have