ahh yes that definition of RJDJ is clear now...
It's nice have Pd ported to here and there but perhaps time need to sort
of licence matters would not make it worth it.
I remember using Pd for the old ipods via ipod linux- that was a really good
project,
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Andy
2011/1/9 ALAN BROOKER alan.brooker2...@gmail.com:
ahh yes that definition of RJDJ is clear now...
It's nice have Pd ported to here and there but perhaps time need to sort
of licence matters would not make it worth it.
I remember using Pd for the old ipods via ipod linux- that was a really
But kids have such a shorter attention span these days
D.
On 1/8/11 4:29 AM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
BTW, the nineties had another site for that, which had a lot more text,
from which you could actually learn, instead of OMG FAIL.
--
::: derek holzer ::: http://macumbista.net :::
Regarding ugly plan: Is app store 'lock-in' any different from apple's usual
hardware' lock in' for laptops/desktops? Pd still runs on those platforms so
why not port ipad, ipod, iphone upud, ipid etc?
In any case isnt RJDJ the port for Pd to this platform anyway ? I could be
wrong- not 100%
I don't want to loose time to studying apple guidelines. One question
is important since it was an issue with the iPhone store: is GPL
compatible with this stuff?
http://www.fsf.org/news/2010-05-app-store-compliance
best!
bernardo
___
Pd-list@iem.at
Related: Apple has finally pulled Applidium's VLC video player app
from the iTunes store due to a licensing discrepancy. The situation is
one of the prominent examples of conflict between the open-source GNU
General Public License, which is tied to the VLC player, and the terms
detailed in Apple's
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011, Derek Holzer wrote:
But kids have such a shorter attention span these days
We're not talking about the same kind of readership.
Those who care about UI will read the text of the Hall-of-Shame and find
it to be surprisingly contemporary, even if they're «kids».
My point was that it seems that a non-standart UI doesn't mean that the App
can't go into the Store.
Apparently Apple doesn't take its own guidelines serious or they stretch “very
good” from your quote:
If your user interface is complex or less than very good it may be rejected.
Regarding the
hey, not sure if it's a good or doable idea, but the mac app store is
carrying free music softwares, why not have there a version of Pd?
It might get lots of attention...
cheers
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
AppStore wants to lock users even more, I suggest not contribute to
this ugly plan.
Besides... If your user interface is complex or less than very good
it may be rejected.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/11/01/mac_app_store/page2.html
___
http://readthefuckinghig.tumblr.com/
Am 07.01.2011 um 20:42 schrieb Bernardo Barros:
AppStore wants to lock users even more, I suggest not contribute to
this ugly plan.
Besides... If your user interface is complex or less than very good
it may be rejected.
AppStore wants to lock users even more,
I suggest not contribute to
this ugly plan.
I haven't read or thought about it. But you'd have to tell how is that so,
and how evil it is, then I may see why it's a bad idea.
Don't know if it's doable anyway, and something tells me it might not be...
I have to say I never had an ipod/pad/phone or bought anything from iTunes,
so I'm not aware of the apple deals and issues on it...
2011/1/7 Alexandre Porres por...@gmail.com
AppStore wants to lock users even more,
I suggest not contribute to
this ugly plan.
I haven't read or thought
13 matches
Mail list logo
