Re: [PD] pdp: Handling pdp_v4l VS pdp_v4l2 and possibly updating the examples

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:05 +0200, Charles Goyard c...@fsck.fr wrote: Hi, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: I wonder now-a-days what the statistics are with v4l and v4l2 devices and which are currently more 'representative' (i.e. is v4l still very widely used?) Since v4l1 support has been dumped

[PD] pdp: Handling pdp_v4l VS pdp_v4l2 and possibly updating the examples

All the examples in pdp use pdp_v4l. On two of the machines I tested (with different webcams and distros: ubuntu lucid 10.04 i386 and debian wheezy amd64) these only work with v4l2 (and thus [pdp_v4l2]) I wonder now-a-days what the statistics are with v4l and v4l2 devices and which are currently

Re: [PD] pdp: Handling pdp_v4l VS pdp_v4l2 and possibly updating the examples

I would just do it yourself or prepare for the snarky obscure psuedo-political cheese comments. I change all mine to pdp_v4l2 pp On 6/15/11 3:38 AM, Lorenzo Sutton lsut...@libero.it wrote: All the examples in pdp use pdp_v4l. On two of the machines I tested (with different webcams and distros:

Re: [PD] pdp: Handling pdp_v4l VS pdp_v4l2 and possibly updating the examples

Hi, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: I wonder now-a-days what the statistics are with v4l and v4l2 devices and which are currently more 'representative' (i.e. is v4l still very widely used?) Since v4l1 support has been dumped from the kernel, I believe statistics will be in favor of v4l2. cheers,