On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 02:52:38PM -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Pd already does parallelism, but not using threads. It is determinstic
instead, meaning it will produce the exact same bit-for-bit result
everytime it runs. Its quite hard to make threaded programs do that.
The huge
Hi, Pat
It looks interesting, but I'm not sure yet how you use it. So, you
write an external, and some of the routines can be wrapped up with (or
called from) the pthread templates? Or do you take your routines and
find/replace names to write your externals?
I've been studying parallel
Pd already does parallelism, but not using threads. It is
determinstic instead, meaning it will produce the exact same bit-for-
bit result everytime it runs. Its quite hard to make threaded
programs do that.
.hc
On Oct 27, 2009, at 2:26 PM, Charles Henry wrote:
Hi, Pat
It looks
Hi Charles,
Since i needed to call libusb and it was causing a glitch in the DSP, i
had to use pthread.
some of the routines can be wrapped up with (or called from) the pthread
templates?
No, it's only a template (with a Makefile) as a starting point to code
your own custom external.
hi,
here's a pthread template that works for me:
http://www.workinprogress.ca/pure-data-external-pthread-template/
pat
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
hi,
here's a pthread template that works for me:
http://www.workinprogress.ca/pure-data-external-pthread-template/
pat
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list