Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-05-25 Thread august
> Yo august - I'm working on a variant of the anysndfiler patch you > included that can function as a drop-in replacement for soundfiler. > I'm experiencing some weirdness though - it seems to work ~50% of the > time but the other times it hard-locks my system and spits out > "couldn't get a fram

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-05-24 Thread joel silvestre
> please see here for the memory leak fix: > > http://aug.ment.org/readanysf/download.php > > > it's still leaking a little bit, but I don't think it is due to my code. > It should be much better now. Please let me know how it seems. > > -august. > Yes it's much better! And opening a sound

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-05-21 Thread august
> > > When openning a new soundfile, the previous if any, is not closed > > > properly. The memory is not freed and the whole thing crash. > > > > hmm. I think this was a bug I fixed from an older version. Can you try > > the latest version now and let me know if you still experience this > > pr

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-05-21 Thread joel silvestre
> > When openning a new soundfile, the previous if any, is not closed > > properly. The memory is not freed and the whole thing crash. > > hmm. I think this was a bug I fixed from an older version. Can you try > the latest version now and let me know if you still experience this > problem? > >

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30 // install problem

2009-05-21 Thread jk
hi johannes thanks for your reply. /usr/lib/pd/extra/readanysf~.pd_linux: libgavl.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory readanysf~ ... couldn't create any idea what this could refer to? it refers to an external library (gavl) missing onn your system even though

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30 // install problem

2009-05-21 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
j...@jasonkahn.net wrote: /usr/lib/pd/extra/readanysf~.pd_linux: libgavl.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory readanysf~ ... couldn't create any idea what this could refer to? it refers to an external library (gavl) missing onn your system even though readanysf~

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-05-21 Thread august
> Pd crash if Readanysf is asked to play before Pd dsp is turned on. Once > turned on, dsp can be turned back off without crash when readanysf is > asked to play. thanks again for the report. the new version 0.35 should handle this correctly now. was a stupid mistake. download here: http:/

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-05-21 Thread august
> hi august, > > a very little bug: the length of file is outputed as an int number, > nothing after the decimal point. > > Line 252 in Readsf.cpp is : > return (float)(gavl_time_to_samples( input_audio_format.samplerate, t) / > input_audio_format.samplerate); > > and if I'm not wrong, sh

[PD] readanysf~ v0.30 // install problem

2009-05-21 Thread jk
hi august i'm trying to use readanysf~ but i get the following error in the pd console: /usr/lib/pd/extra/readanysf~.pd_linux: libgavl.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory readanysf~ ... couldn't create any idea what this could refer to? thanks. jason _

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-05-20 Thread joel silvestre
Le mercredi 20 mai 2009 à 18:01 +0200, joel silvestre a écrit : > Le mercredi 29 avril 2009 à 03:41 +0200, august a écrit : > > > > > > hallo, > > > > > > I made some major bug fixes to my readanysf~ external. > > readanysf~ is a puredata external for reading many file formats from >

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-05-20 Thread joel silvestre
Le mercredi 29 avril 2009 à 03:41 +0200, august a écrit : > > > hallo, > > > I made some major bug fixes to my readanysf~ external. > readanysf~ is a puredata external for reading many file formats from > your hard disk or via network. > > please check it out. > > >

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-05-01 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On May 1, 2009, at 3:12 AM, august wrote: what exactly does that mean? Do you mean compiling it in statically? Or, do you mean compiling and installing the libraries? If you mean statically, I'm not sure, but I think it will be difficult since it is gmerlin based on a plugin architectur

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-05-01 Thread august
> >what exactly does that mean? Do you mean compiling it in statically? > >Or, do you mean compiling and installing the libraries? If you mean > >statically, I'm not sure, but I think it will be difficult since it is > >gmerlin based on a plugin architecture of shared objects. > > > >-a > > Sta

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-04-30 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Apr 30, 2009, at 7:19 PM, august wrote: i hope that gavl/gmerlin will be included in (more) distros soon In the meantime, I think it would be worth it to have gavl/gmerlin build out of the pure-data SVN. Then we can remove it once its widely packaged. .hc what exactly does that mea

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-04-30 Thread august
> >i hope that gavl/gmerlin will be included in (more) distros soon > > In the meantime, I think it would be worth it to have gavl/gmerlin > build out of the pure-data SVN. Then we can remove it once its widely > packaged. > > .hc > what exactly does that mean? Do you mean compiling it in

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-04-30 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Apr 30, 2009, at 3:35 PM, zmoel...@iem.at wrote: Quoting august : I don't know gavl, but it if it is close to as good as vlc/mplayer/ ffmpeg for reading codecs, it would be an improvement over Quicktime. you mean "QuickTime" or "libquicktime" (4linux)? as a matter of fact, the autho

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-04-30 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Apr 30, 2009, at 10:16 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote: Hallo, Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Yeah, an [anysoundfiler] would be super handy. Almost there already: Search the archive for [oggfiler]: It's an abstraction I once wrote that uses [oggread~] to

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-04-30 Thread august
> >yes, and AFAIK the gavl package in debian is already over a year old and > >is not compatible with readanysf~. > > while the former is true, is the latter also true? > iirc, i can compile Gem against both the debian-package and my cvs > checkout of gmerlin (though i haven't followed changes i

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-04-30 Thread zmoelnig
Quoting august : yes, and AFAIK the gavl package in debian is already over a year old and is not compatible with readanysf~. while the former is true, is the latter also true? iirc, i can compile Gem against both the debian-package and my cvs checkout of gmerlin (though i haven't followed ch

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-04-30 Thread zmoelnig
Quoting august : I don't know gavl, but it if it is close to as good as vlc/mplayer/ ffmpeg for reading codecs, it would be an improvement over Quicktime. you mean "QuickTime" or "libquicktime" (4linux)? as a matter of fact, the author of gavl/gmerlin is also the author of libquicktime (a

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-04-30 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Apr 30, 2009, at 1:14 PM, august wrote: I don't know gavl, but it if it is close to as good as vlc/mplayer/ ffmpeg for reading codecs, it would be an improvement over Quicktime. it is very close to vlc/mplayer/ffmpeg. in fact, it might even read more formats depending on what options yo

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-04-30 Thread august
> I don't know gavl, but it if it is close to as good as vlc/mplayer/ > ffmpeg for reading codecs, it would be an improvement over Quicktime. it is very close to vlc/mplayer/ffmpeg. in fact, it might even read more formats depending on what options you compile in. > gavl is already in macpo

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-04-30 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Apr 30, 2009, at 8:46 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: august wrote: ah, this is good news (for the gavl advocates at least). Are you planning on using it just in linux then? Or, are you looking to make builds for mac and win as well? well, i'm planning to use it on every platform tha

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-04-30 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > Yeah, an [anysoundfiler] would be super handy. Almost there already: Search the archive for [oggfiler]: It's an abstraction I once wrote that uses [oggread~] to read oggfiles into tables in an upsampled subpatch. Should

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-04-30 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
august wrote: ah, this is good news (for the gavl advocates at least). Are you planning on using it just in linux then? Or, are you looking to make builds for mac and win as well? well, i'm planning to use it on every platform that supports it :-) currently i don't have any plans (nor time

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-04-30 Thread august
> >I think you will see gavl/gmerlin become more standard in the future. > >Lumiera, the new video editing software from the cinelerra-cv folks, is > >based on it. > > and Gem :-) ah, this is good news (for the gavl advocates at least). Are you planning on using it just in linux then? Or, are

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-04-30 Thread august
> >> well ..that sounds brilliant - > >> but why is it dependent on some 'gavl' ?? > > > > hmm, that's interesting as a hard dependency on gavl makes readanysf~ be > > pretty much linux only at the moment (despite of what is discussed on other > > lists...) > Yeah, indeed. I was very excited about

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-04-30 Thread Luke Iannini
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 12:09 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > errordevelo...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> hi >> >> well ..that sounds brilliant - >> but why is it dependent on some 'gavl' ?? > > hmm, that's interesting as a hard dependency on gavl makes readanysf~ be > pretty much linux only at the mom

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-04-30 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
august wrote: hi gavl is a really brilliant low-level library which handles the details of audio and video formats like colorspaces, samplerates, multichannel configurations etc. i basically agree. and it is super simple. it took me two days during(!) piksel (while drinking beer and stuff)

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-04-30 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
errordevelo...@gmail.com wrote: hi well ..that sounds brilliant - but why is it dependent on some 'gavl' ?? hmm, that's interesting as a hard dependency on gavl makes readanysf~ be pretty much linux only at the moment (despite of what is discussed on other lists...) anyhow, Gem's HEAD has

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-04-29 Thread august
> > libaudiofile is not much different from the more common libsndfile. > > Both only read "uncompressed" formats. > > Not quite right. libsndfile file reads a number of compressed formats > such as WAV and AIFF files (containing A-law, u-law, GSM 6.10, IMA ADPCM, > MS ADPCM and some G7xx formats)

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-04-29 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
august wrote: > libaudiofile is not much different from the more common libsndfile. > Both only read "uncompressed" formats. Not quite right. libsndfile file reads a number of compressed formats such as WAV and AIFF files (containing A-law, u-law, GSM 6.10, IMA ADPCM, MS ADPCM and some G7xx forma

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-04-29 Thread august
> hi > > well ..that sounds brilliant - > but why is it dependent on some 'gavl' ?? > > not something more common, like libaudiofile, for example?? > libaudiofile is not much different from the more common libsndfile. Both only read "uncompressed" formats. gavl is a really brilliant low-leve

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-04-29 Thread august
> hi, > > is it possible to use it as something like soundfiler that can handle > mp3-files (write the samples to a table not in realtime and not > upsampled)? or is something like that out there? > g. > if it is not out there already, I could probably whip it together rather soon. -a. _

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-04-29 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Yeah, an [anysoundfiler] would be super handy. .hc On Apr 29, 2009, at 1:24 PM, errordevelo...@gmail.com wrote: hi well ..that sounds brilliant - but why is it dependent on some 'gavl' ?? not something more common, like libaudiofile, for example?? is it buffered? On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-04-29 Thread errordeveloper
hi well ..that sounds brilliant - but why is it dependent on some 'gavl' ?? not something more common, like libaudiofile, for example?? is it buffered? On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 03:41:46AM +0200, august wrote: > > > hallo, > > > I made some major bug fixes to my readanysf~ external.

Re: [PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-04-29 Thread Georg Werner
hi, is it possible to use it as something like soundfiler that can handle mp3-files (write the samples to a table not in realtime and not upsampled)? or is something like that out there? g. august schrieb: hallo, I made some major bug fixes to my readanysf~ external. readanysf~ is a p

[PD] readanysf~ v0.30

2009-04-28 Thread august
hallo, I made some major bug fixes to my readanysf~ external. readanysf~ is a puredata external for reading many file formats from your hard disk or via network. please check it out. http://aug.ment.org/readanysf -august.