On Jul 12, 2011, at 2:13 PM, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
Many thanks for this contribution! I will add this to pd-l2ork.
However, shouldn't also route output bang when having an empty list?
Should pd's message system leave this responsibility to
On Fri, 8 Jul 2011, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote:
Many thanks for this contribution! I will add this to pd-l2ork. However,
shouldn't also route output bang when having an empty list?
Should pd's message system leave this responsibility to each individual
class ? If it does, problems like this will
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011, Joe White wrote:
This is connected to a [pack f]. When I bang the start message the route
object outputs a bang, which in turn should output the stored number in
the pack object. However, this does not happen (which is the problem).
If I connect a [t b] after the [route]
Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Fri, 7/8/11, Ivica Ico Bukvic i...@vt.edu wrote:
From: Ivica Ico Bukvic i...@vt.edu
Subject: RE: [PD] route - pack issue
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Cc: pd-list@iem.at
Date: Friday, July 8, 2011, 8:12 PM
Jonathan Wilkes
--- On Sat, 7/9/11, Ivica Ico Bukvic i...@vt.edu wrote:
From: Ivica Ico Bukvic i...@vt.edu
Subject: RE: [PD] route - pack issue
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Cc: pd-list@iem.at
Date: Saturday, July 9, 2011, 10:33 AM
Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
wrote:
--- On Fri
static void pack_list(t_pack *x, t_symbol *s, int ac, t_atom *av)
{
if (ac==0)
pack_bang(x);
else
obj_list(x-x_obj, 0, ac, av);
}
Many thanks for this contribution! I will add this to pd-l2ork. However,
shouldn't also route output bang when having an empty list?
--- On Fri, 7/8/11, Ivica Ico Bukvic i...@vt.edu wrote:
From: Ivica Ico Bukvic i...@vt.edu
Subject: RE: [PD] route - pack issue
To: 'Jonathan Wilkes' jancs...@yahoo.com
Cc: pd-list@iem.at
Date: Friday, July 8, 2011, 4:54 PM
static void pack_list(t_pack *x,
t_symbol *s, int ac, t_atom
Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Fri, 7/8/11, Ivica Ico Bukvic i...@vt.edu wrote:
From: Ivica Ico Bukvic i...@vt.edu
Subject: RE: [PD] route - pack issue
To: 'Jonathan Wilkes' jancs...@yahoo.com
Cc: pd-list@iem.at
Date: Friday, July 8, 2011, 4:54 PM
static void
--- On Fri, 7/8/11, Ivica Ico Bukvic i...@vt.edu wrote:
From: Ivica Ico Bukvic i...@vt.edu
Subject: RE: [PD] route - pack issue
To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Cc: pd-list@iem.at
Date: Friday, July 8, 2011, 8:12 PM
Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
wrote:
--- On Fri, 7
Hi list,
I've been doing some patching with [route] and came across a problem - I'd
love it if someone could explain why this happens otherwise I think it's a
bug.
Basically I'm sending a message with one item to a route object with an
argument of the same name. For example:
[start (
|
[route
Yep, there is a bug. For a workaround, you can add a [bang( message
between [route] and [pack].
++
Jack
Le jeudi 07 juillet 2011 à 17:44 +0100, Joe White a écrit :
Hi list,
I've been doing some patching with [route] and came across a problem -
I'd love it if someone could explain why
Yeah, thought as much. Just a bit annoying.
Thanks,
Joe
On 7 July 2011 17:57, Jack j...@rybn.org wrote:
Yep, there is a bug. For a workaround, you can add a [bang( message
between [route] and [pack].
++
Jack
Le jeudi 07 juillet 2011 à 17:44 +0100, Joe White a écrit :
Hi list,
, Jack j...@rybn.org wrote:
From: Jack j...@rybn.org
Subject: Re: [PD] route - pack issue
To: Joe White white.j...@gmail.com
Cc: pd-list pd-list@iem.at
Date: Thursday, July 7, 2011, 6:57 PM
Yep, there is a bug. For a
workaround, you can add a [bang( message
between [route] and [pack
...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [PD] route - pack issue
To: Joe White white.j...@gmail.com, Jack j...@rybn.org
Cc: pd-list pd-list@iem.at
Date: Thursday, July 7, 2011, 7:44 PM
[route] outputs an empty list which,
for simplicity's sake, is supposed
14 matches
Mail list logo
