On Oct 6, 2007, at 3:07 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
A pdpedia page should be a complete resource all about that given
object, or whatever. If the wikipedians avoided duplicating things
that exist, wikipedia would be
yes, maybe I was not not precise, but that's what I had in mind. I just
wanted to say, that if we know about a bug then we could put a note
about the bug on the wikipage of that objectclass (for information
purpose, but not for discussion purpose).
marius.
if someone leaves a note somewhere,
On Oct 4, 2007, at 2:02 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote:
I think of pdpedia more like an encyclopedia. but I think a
discussion
forum for bugs and comments beside the mailing list is a good
idea. the
cross linking can by done
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
The pdpedia bugs section and the bug tracker serve quite different
purposes. The bug tracker is for information leading to fixing a
bug. The pdpedia bug section is for documenting the existance of
know bugs and known workarounds.
i see: the bug tracker
On Oct 5, 2007, at 12:27 PM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
The pdpedia bugs section and the bug tracker serve quite different
purposes. The bug tracker is for information leading to fixing a
bug. The pdpedia bug section is for documenting the existance of
know
Hallo,
marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote:
I think of pdpedia more like an encyclopedia. but I think a discussion
forum for bugs and comments beside the mailing list is a good idea. the
cross linking can by done by linking to mails in the pd-list archives
and vice
yes, maybe I was not not precise, but that's what I had in mind. I just
wanted to say, that if we know about a bug then we could put a note
about the bug on the wikipage of that objectclass (for information
purpose, but not for discussion purpose).
marius.
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
Hallo,
marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote:
one of the side effects of pdpedia is that with the overview of all the
objects there are also a lot of objects that are ~buggy that are not
working.
especially flatspace makes problems.
help-patches are not showing up, many
isn't it possible to make a comment section, where such problems can be
indicated?
one of the side effects of pdpedia is that with the overview of all the
objects there are also a lot of objects that are ~buggy that are not
working.
especially flatspace makes problems.
help-patches are
not only a settings problem. many objects are broken. at least on os x.
and for some it is not possible to rightclick, like entry or popup.
the rest is a settings problem, true.
marius.
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
marius schebella hat gesagt: // marius schebella wrote:
one of the side
marius schebella wrote:
not only a settings problem. many objects are broken. at least on os x.
broken in which way?
and for some it is not possible to rightclick, like entry or popup.
is this broken behaviour or just missing feature?
mfgasdr
IOhannes
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
marius schebella wrote:
not only a settings problem. many objects are broken. at least on os x.
broken in which way?
show up in the pd-extended release but cannot be created.
and for some it is not possible to rightclick, like entry or popup.
is this broken
about pdpedia features:
Could there be a good way to cross-index (in pdpedia) with bug
reports, and show how they were fixed? Most user problems get posted
to pd-list, and any unresolved issues get placed in the reports.
A comment section is likely to be plagued with ambiguous user
problems and
hi,
I think of pdpedia more like an encyclopedia. but I think a discussion
forum for bugs and comments beside the mailing list is a good idea. the
cross linking can by done by linking to mails in the pd-list archives
and vice versa. still, I think bugs should be mentioned in the pdpedia
pages.
You can browse for help patches in the help browser.
But yes, things are a mess. :D
.hc
On Oct 3, 2007, at 8:28 AM, marius schebella wrote:
not only a settings problem. many objects are broken. at least on
os x.
and for some it is not possible to rightclick, like entry or popup.
the
Yes, definitely! This is one of the main reasons why I am interested
in the pdpedia.
.hc
On Oct 3, 2007, at 8:08 AM, João Miguel Pais wrote:
isn't it possible to make a comment section, where such problems
can be
indicated?
one of the side effects of pdpedia is that with the
hi,
one of the side effects of pdpedia is that with the overview of all the
objects there are also a lot of objects that are ~buggy that are not
working.
especially flatspace makes problems.
help-patches are not showing up, many objects cannot be created. :(
but anyway, I created a new category
17 matches
Mail list logo
