Re: [PD] signal / message

2009-05-12 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On May 10, 2009, at 5:40 PM, Wolfgang Jäger wrote: Jaime Oliver wrote: well, the question is for what reason are you doing it? I want to send audio data packed in OSC messages/bundles over Ethernet. Whoa, unless you really want OSC, I think there are better ways to do this. Check

Re: [PD] signal / message

2009-05-11 Thread Ingo Scherzinger
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 17:29 +0200, Wolfgang J?ger wrote: Hello, What's the best way to convert a signal into a message? There are possibilities like snapshot~ or vsnapshot~, but they are not accurate. The error they produce when you convert into a message and reconvert to a signal

Re: [PD] signal / message

2009-05-11 Thread Hans Roels
env~ outputs RMS values, have a look in Puckettes book: http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/techniques/latest/book-html/node54.html http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/techniques/latest/book-html/node8.html Hans r At 08:14 11/05/2009, Ingo Scherzinger wrote: On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 17:29 +0200, Wolfgang J?ger wrote:

Re: [PD] signal / message

2009-05-11 Thread Ingo Scherzinger
] Gesendet: Montag, 11. Mai 2009 08:45 An: Ingo Scherzinger Betreff: Re: [PD] signal / message env~ outputs RMS values, have a look in Puckettes book: http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/techniques/latest/book-html/node54.html http://crca.ucsd.edu/~msp/techniques/latest/book-html/node8.html Hans r At 08

Re: [PD] signal / message

2009-05-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Ingo Scherzinger wrote: Thank you Hans, that's about what I expected. Now having read this I was wondering if there is an object that reports the peak amplitude of a given window size rather than RMS. Does anybody know? iemlib's [prvu~] nothing in Pd-vanilla, afaik. fgamsdr IOhannes

Re: [PD] signal / message

2009-05-11 Thread Ingo Scherzinger
[prvu~] looks very interesting. Thanx! Ingo -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: IOhannes m zmoelnig [mailto:zmoel...@iem.at] Gesendet: Montag, 11. Mai 2009 10:26 An: Ingo Scherzinger Cc: 'Hans Roels'; pd-list@iem.at Betreff: Re: [PD] signal / message Ingo Scherzinger

[PD] signal / message

2009-05-10 Thread Wolfgang Jäger
Hello, What's the best way to convert a signal into a message? There are possibilities like snapshot~ or vsnapshot~, but they are not accurate. The error they produce when you convert into a message and reconvert to a signal (with sig~, line~ or vline~) is clearly audible. ciao Wolfgang

Re: [PD] signal / message

2009-05-10 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 17:29 +0200, Wolfgang Jäger wrote: Hello, What's the best way to convert a signal into a message? There are possibilities like snapshot~ or vsnapshot~, but they are not accurate. The error they produce when you convert into a message and reconvert to a signal (with

Re: [PD] signal / message

2009-05-10 Thread Jaime Oliver
well, the question is for what reason are you doing it? I think it is better to get some features from say sigmund~ and use those to control or recreate, but i don't know what you want J On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Roman Haefeli reduzie...@yahoo.de wrote: On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 17:29

Re: [PD] signal / message

2009-05-10 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
--- On Sun, 5/10/09, Roman Haefeli reduzie...@yahoo.de wrote: From: Roman Haefeli reduzie...@yahoo.de Subject: Re: [PD] signal / message To: Wolfgang Jäger wolfgang.jae...@gmx.at Cc: pd-list@iem.at Date: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 5:54 PM On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 17:29 +0200, Wolfgang Jäger

Re: [PD] signal / message

2009-05-10 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 13:28 -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: --- On Sun, 5/10/09, Roman Haefeli reduzie...@yahoo.de wrote: From: Roman Haefeli reduzie...@yahoo.de Subject: Re: [PD] signal / message To: Wolfgang Jäger wolfgang.jae...@gmx.at Cc: pd-list@iem.at Date: Sunday, May 10

Re: [PD] signal / message

2009-05-10 Thread Andy Farnell
Isn't it the last sample of the _last_ block? I heard that somewhere. So if you're processing block N on the current DSP tick what you see is the [snapshot~] of N-1 ??? On Sun, 10 May 2009 13:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com wrote: Isn't it the last sample of the

Re: [PD] signal / message

2009-05-10 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote: an easier way is to use [pack~] and [unpack~] from zexy. those convert a signal vector (one block of audio samples) to a list of floats and vice versa. if you want to have a stream of floats instead of lists, use [drip]. Or use

Re: [PD] signal / message

2009-05-10 Thread Wolfgang Jäger
Jaime Oliver wrote: well, the question is for what reason are you doing it? I want to send audio data packed in OSC messages/bundles over Ethernet. I think it is better to get some features from say sigmund~ and use those to control or recreate, but i don't know what you want I guess in

Re: [PD] signal / message

2009-05-10 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
--- On Sun, 5/10/09, Andy Farnell padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk wrote: From: Andy Farnell padawa...@obiwannabe.co.uk Subject: Re: [PD] signal / message To: Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.com Cc: wolfgang.jae...@gmx.at, reduzie...@yahoo.de, pd-list@iem.at Date: Sunday, May 10, 2009, 9:57 PM

Re: [PD] signal / message

2009-05-10 Thread Wolfgang Jäger
Frank Barknecht wrote: Hallo, Roman Haefeli hat gesagt: // Roman Haefeli wrote: an easier way is to use [pack~] and [unpack~] from zexy. those convert a signal vector (one block of audio samples) to a list of floats and vice versa. if you want to have a stream of floats instead of lists,