Re: [PD] thoughts on Pd's networking framework

2010-05-25 Thread errordeveloper
well .. antennas are important btw .. but check how many networks are there in the area, then if you could find what channels they use try to use a channel with least number of networks ;) but if you still don't get it ..then something is crap. also try to setup a network between two machines

Re: [PD] thoughts on Pd's networking framework

2010-05-25 Thread Thomas Grill
Hi all, from what i heard about experiences with the IEM CubeMixer system (with a lot of GUI-DSP communication between two PD processes) the fact that PD sends out network data packets in bursts seems to be problematic not only for WLAN but for the OS networking sockets (with limited buffer sizes)

Re: [PD] thoughts on Pd's networking framework

2010-05-25 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Mon, 24 May 2010, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote: Using either off-the-shelf wifi hardware or an industrial strength wifi router (in our case Cisco), we get unexpected lag spikes on local WLAN with 16 clients at times even exceeding 2 seconds for some of the clients. Can you automate measurement

Re: [PD] thoughts on Pd's networking framework

2010-05-25 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-05-25 16:38, Thomas Grill wrote: Hi all, If i were dependent on it, i would write a threaded networking external to circumvent PD networking functionality and find out whether this is the culprit. that's why there now is iemnet. first test showed that it is way faster than mrpeach's

[PD] thoughts on Pd's networking framework

2010-05-24 Thread Ivica Ico Bukvic
So, we've tried to do a series of tests using tcpserver/client as well as netserver/client and found the following: Using either off-the-shelf wifi hardware or an industrial strength wifi router (in our case Cisco), we get unexpected lag spikes on local WLAN with 16 clients at times even