-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-04-30 23:43, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
This leads me to the question: are there any more 0.93 releases planned?
John's bug and the Mac OS X 1 frame video playback are show stoppers. It
seems that Pd-extended should just switch to
On May 2, 2012, at 2:47 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-04-30 23:43, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
This leads me to the question: are there any more 0.93 releases planned?
John's bug and the Mac OS X 1 frame video playback are show
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-04-21 15:42, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
On Apr 21, 2012, at 9:09 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-04-16 20:44, John Harrison wrote:
Sorry for the delay on this. I downloaded
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-04-16 20:44, John Harrison wrote:
Sorry for the delay on this. I downloaded today's binary build of
Pd-extended for Ubuntu 11.10 32 bit, then ran Pd-extended with -nrt in
is it possible to build Gem (from the git master branch) yourself?
On Apr 21, 2012, at 9:09 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-04-16 20:44, John Harrison wrote:
Sorry for the delay on this. I downloaded today's binary build of
Pd-extended for Ubuntu 11.10 32 bit, then ran Pd-extended with -nrt in
is it
Sorry for the delay on this. I downloaded today's binary build of
Pd-extended for Ubuntu 11.10 32 bit, then ran Pd-extended with -nrt in gdb.
I still get a segfault when opening/deleting/opening test99.pd as an
abstraction. For your convenience, test99.pd is again attached. Here's the
backtrace:
Today's build still fails with same test:
[New Thread 0x1defb70 (LWP 19910)]
[New Thread 0x2c86b70 (LWP 19911)]
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
outlet_anything (x=0x0, s=0x81c7df0, argc=2, argv=0x82181b8) at m_obj.c:469
469 m_obj.c: No such file or directory.
in m_obj.c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-04-05 17:35, John Harrison wrote:
Today's build still fails with same test:
[New Thread 0x1defb70 (LWP 19910)]
[New Thread 0x2c86b70 (LWP 19911)]
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
outlet_anything (x=0x0,
I'll see if I can figure all that out and test this weekend... I assume
with git log it will be obvious what commit I need to cherry-pick.
-John
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:08 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-04-04 03:25,
On Apr 4, 2012, at 8:09 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-04-04 14:06, John Harrison wrote:
I'll see if I can figure all that out and test this weekend... I assume
with git log it will be obvious what commit I need to cherry-pick.
Today's build (April 3, 2012) still crashes with creating/destroying
test99.pd. The gdb reports something a bit different though:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0807fd79 in pd_typedmess (x=0x647261, s=0x81c7f68, argc=2, argv=0x825fb80)
at m_class.c:707
707 m_class.c:
What's test99.pd? Is this a new crash with today's build?
.hc
On Apr 3, 2012, at 3:03 PM, John Harrison wrote:
Today's build (April 3, 2012) still crashes with creating/destroying
test99.pd. The gdb reports something a bit different though:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation
I can't tell if this is a new crash triggered by the same create/destroy
event or the old crash. The same scenario triggers the crash
(create/destroy test99.pd in a new canvas) but gdb reports something
different. This is on today's build, Oneiric 32 bit. test99.pd was attached
on this thread and
On 04/03/12 21:23, John Harrison wrote:
I can't tell if this is a new crash triggered by the same create/destroy
event or the old crash. The same scenario triggers the crash
(create/destroy test99.pd in a new canvas) but gdb reports something
different. This is on today's build, Oneiric 32 bit.
On Apr 3, 2012, at 4:42 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
On 04/03/12 21:23, John Harrison wrote:
I can't tell if this is a new crash triggered by the same create/destroy
event or the old crash. The same scenario triggers the crash
(create/destroy test99.pd in a new canvas) but gdb reports
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-03-29 19:03, John Harrison wrote:
I've been trying to track down a seg fault I keep getting and I'm still
not sure if the problem is Gem or Pd-extended or what.
This is the latest pd-extended 0.43.1 Beta CVS March 29 (today) running
on
On Apr 2, 2012, at 3:32 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2012-03-29 19:03, John Harrison wrote:
I've been trying to track down a seg fault I keep getting and I'm still
not sure if the problem is Gem or Pd-extended or what.
This is the
I've been trying to track down a seg fault I keep getting and I'm still not
sure if the problem is Gem or Pd-extended or what.
This is the latest pd-extended 0.43.1 Beta CVS March 29 (today) running on
Oneric 32 but. I have simplified my patch to a point it doesn't make sense
anymore but I can
18 matches
Mail list logo
