RE : [PD] GOP control with messages

2007-02-16 Thread Patco
Frank Barknecht a écrit : Hallo, patco hat gesagt: // patco wrote: donecanvasdialog is the magik trick Attached is another trik (requires 0.40 up). (I also removed the namecanvas, which isn't needed in my subpatch-example.) Ciao ohoh, nice one! namecanvas isn't necessary at

Re: RE : [PD] GOP control with messages

2007-02-16 Thread Frank Barknecht
Hallo, Patco hat gesagt: // Patco wrote: namecanvas isn't necessary at all indeed, :). I've observed through some tests that a namecanvas is disabling the reception of a message of a subpatch when they both have the same name, although I dunno if it's usefull yet. I don't think it can be

Re: [PD] GOP control with messages

2007-02-15 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Is it possible to move GOP visible box using messages? I mean the red box that determines what is visible. This would be very handy to be able to do. yes it is. i remember a thread on this list where this has been discussed. mv.asdr IOhannes

RE : [PD] GOP control with messages

2007-02-15 Thread patco
Hans-Christoph Steiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Is it possible to move GOP visible box using messages? I mean the red box that determines what is visible. This would be very handy to be able to do. .hc donecanvasdialog is the magik trick pc

Re: [PD] GOP control with messages

2007-02-15 Thread Kyle Klipowicz
Oooh that would be handy! Does anyone have a link to that thread in the archives? ~Kyle On 2/15/07, IOhannes m zmoelnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Is it possible to move GOP visible box using messages? I mean the red box that determines what is visible. This

Re: [PD] GOP control with messages

2007-02-15 Thread patco
Kyle Klipowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Oooh that would be handy! Does anyone have a link to that thread in the archives? Yes I have a link to those threads. - Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions !