Hi Pall,
On 10/02/2014 04:45, Pall Thayer wrote:
This was a faculty grant at a US arts-focused college. I would say that
95% of students, 80% of faculty use Apple products. That really doesn't
matter though.
As you asked for feedback..
I think it does. I'm not proposing the usual (sterile)
On 10/02/14 20:27, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
Hi Pall,
On 10/02/2014 04:45, Pall Thayer wrote:
This was a faculty grant at a US arts-focused college. I would say that
95% of students, 80% of faculty use Apple products. That really doesn't
matter though.
As you asked for feedback..
I think it
Hi Pall,
First off I would make the distinction between Free Software and Open
Source (sorry to bring that one up again:).
Secondly, the big thing for me is that this is really all about
social-relations - how do I wish to be treated and how will I treat others.
I could bang on and on but that's
To answer your last question: have a look at webpd:
https://github.com/sebpiq/WebPd
There's a simple demo patch here:
http://sebpiq.github.io/WebPd/sound-check/sound-check.html
That's Pd's basic audio engine and message passing system running in
javascript. So in terms of open source, the
Hi Jonathan,
Thanks. That's exactly the sort of thing I'm looking for. I thought WebPD
was dead. Nice to see it alive and kicking.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Jonathan Wilkes jancs...@yahoo.comwrote:
To answer your last question: have a look at webpd:
https://github.com/sebpiq/WebPd
On 11/02/14 04:40, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Unfortunately the open source definition was designed to subtly hide the
ethical reasons for doing open source development. The reasoning for this
was quite straightforward-- share with your neighbor doesn't attract
business dollars. So open source
On 02/10/2014 05:31 PM, Simon Wise wrote:
On 11/02/14 04:40, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Unfortunately the open source definition was designed to subtly hide the
ethical reasons for doing open source development. The reasoning for
this
was quite straightforward-- share with your neighbor doesn't
On 11/02/14 10:46, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
On 02/10/2014 05:31 PM, Simon Wise wrote:
On 11/02/14 04:40, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Unfortunately the open source definition was designed to subtly hide the
ethical reasons for doing open source development. The reasoning for this
was quite
What App Pall?
Patrick Pagano B.S, M.F.A
Audio and Projection Design Faculty
Digital Worlds Institute
University of Florida, USA
(352)294-2020
From: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [pd-list-boun...@iem.at] on behalf of Pall Thayer
[pallt...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday,
On 10/02/14 11:53, Pall Thayer wrote:
I'm giving a presentation this week. In a way, it's a counter argument to a
recent presentation on Max/MSP. One of the things that I want to highlight
is the open sourceness of PD. libpd presents a very good argument and
I'll be highlighting a project I was
This is where things enter into the odd world of academia. In all honesty,
I think our application for the particular grant that was available was an
outlier. The grant came with caveats. Projects were to target technology
that would likely be used by faculty and students and the resulting work
On 10/02/14 13:36, Pall Thayer wrote:
This is where things enter into the odd world of academia. In all honesty,
I think our application for the particular grant that was available was an
outlier. The grant came with caveats. Projects were to target technology
that would likely be used by
https://github.com/pallthayer/gesturalmusic
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 10:45 PM, Pall Thayer pallt...@gmail.com wrote:
This was a faculty grant at a US arts-focused college. I would say that
95% of students, 80% of faculty use Apple products. That really doesn't
matter though. The project is out
This was a faculty grant at a US arts-focused college. I would say that 95%
of students, 80% of faculty use Apple products. That really doesn't matter
though. The project is out there. It can be ported to any platform if
people want. More than anything, it was a proof-of-concept project.
If it
On 10/02/14 14:45, Pall Thayer wrote:
This was a faculty grant at a US arts-focused college. I would say that 95%
of students, 80% of faculty use Apple products. That really doesn't matter
though. The project is out there. It can be ported to any platform if
people want. More than anything, it
Interesting points. I posted it to github as GPL. It probably doesn't
conform to true GPL though as I didn't put that in all of the source files.
Truth is, I really don't care. If Apple requires a BSD license, that never
would have happened anyway. But this is all getting far away from my
original
On 10/02/14 14:46, Pall Thayer wrote:
https://github.com/pallthayer/gesturalmusic
It's GPL, so no enterprising re-distribution allowed.
I'll give it a try if I get time with an iOS device.
Thanks,
Simon
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
On 10/02/14 11:53, Pall Thayer wrote:
is the open sourceness of PD. libpd presents a very good argument and
I'll be highlighting a project I was involved with that produced an IOS app
that used libpd as the audio engine. Is there anything else I should be
considering besides the obvious points
18 matches
Mail list logo
