Yeah, I really don't think that Intel broke backwards compatibility with those
new chips. There might be something else causing this issue, can you provide
more info? A build log, the exact text of the error, etc.
.hc
On Nov 4, 2012, at 4:46 AM, Thomas Grill wrote:
> I would be very surprise
I would be very surprised if core2 binaries don't run on i3/i5/i7. In fact i
compile all my binaries with optimization for core2 and switch back and forth
between both platforms without any problems.
gr~~~
--
Thomas Grill
http://g.org
Am 04.11.2012 um 00:51 schrieb Miller Puckette :
> Thi
Have you tried Hans' library template?
https://puredata.info/docs/developer/LibraryTemplate/
J
On Nov 3, 2012, at 7:31 PM, Rich E wrote:
> Don't you want to compile universal binaries (-arch i386 -arch x86_64)? That
> way you only need one set.
>
> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Miller Pu
Don't you want to compile universal binaries (-arch i386 -arch x86_64)?
That way you only need one set.
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Miller Puckette wrote:
> This is strange... I thought i3/5/7 were upwards compatible with older
> processors and hence should not need any recompilation at all
This is strange... I thought i3/5/7 were upwards compatible with older
processors and hence should not need any recompilation at all. I hope
there's some mistake... otherwise we'd need to make a whole new set of
binaries for everything.
Miller
On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 10:47:10PM +0100, Orm Finnen
