i just made a synth which makes some really nice tones when i feed it
really high frequencies. (midi notes 150-300)
question is, will this sound the same on all computers, or do
different systems handle such high frequencies differently?
___
Hallo!
i just made a synth which makes some really nice tones when i feed it
really high frequencies. (midi notes 150-300)
question is, will this sound the same on all computers, or do
different systems handle such high frequencies differently?
Hm ... it depends in the sampling frequency.
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 17:59 +0900, hard off wrote:
i just made a synth which makes some really nice tones when i feed it
really high frequencies. (midi notes 150-300)
question is, will this sound the same on all computers, or do
different systems handle such high frequencies differently?
Hmmm... I'm interested on the Firepod, but I am I little afraid about
processing issues... It seens to be a nice soundcard since it has 8
preamped mic ins, what could be very useful on interactive
performances... no mixer or preamps needed at all.
Do you know anything about it?
About Motu...
On Wed, 2006-10-25 at 09:37 -0300, padovani wrote:
I would like to know if anyone is using one of these interfaces (on
WinXP/ OSX/ Linux-freebob) for interactive performance with PD. Comments
are welcome...
Presonus Firepod
FA-101 / FA-66
Motu 828mkII / Motu Traveller / Motu Ultralite
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 10:48:32PM +0900, hard off wrote:
this is a bummer, cos i am getting a really nice palette of sounds
here, and i wanted to share the patch
oh well, i'll stick to normal midi notes for that i guess.
Don't be too bummed out. Given what's been said here I'm not sure
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Fanouris Moraitis wrote:
/Users/fan/pd-extended/Gem/src/Base/CPPExtern.h:40: warning: 'class
GemException' has virtual functions but non-virtual destructor
/System/Library/Frameworks/CoreServices.framework/Frameworks/OSServices.framework/Headers/OpenTransport.h:723:
error:
I made this mistake again last thursday - I computed sound amplitude of
some kind of omnidirectional source as being r^-2 where r is the distance.
However, I believe that it's energy that should be r^-2, therefore
amplitude should be r^-1. That's assuming ideal 3-D dispersion (no
ceilings and no
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 06:54:27AM +0100, padawan12 wrote:
This is as expected. What Chris says is no surprise. If you render the output
to a .wav file it is captured as a snapshot and the sample rate no longer
has any effect (other than to change the overall playback rate). The problem
Hallo,
Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
I think this logic makes sense, but I haven't played with it yet.
You don't need to play with it much, it's a decision to make: Do you
want to have [list length] give the same length for 1 2 3 and a b
c and list a b c or
10 matches
Mail list logo
