Hi!
What reason can there be if the same patch does not display the same
fontsizes on two different computers, both running the same OS and the
same Pd version?
regards, PP
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
Peter Plessas wrote:
What reason can there be if the same patch does not display the same
fontsizes on two different computers, both running the same OS and the
same Pd version?
Screen DPI setting. This could even vary between two screens on the
same computer in a dual-head setup, here it
Thanks, will have a look!
glg, Peter
Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
Peter Plessas wrote:
What reason can there be if the same patch does not display the same
fontsizes on two different computers, both running the same OS and the
same Pd version?
Screen DPI setting. This could even vary
if the same os is some linux flavour, it is probably because of
different display settings that result in different font scalings. i
noticed, that on computers with smaller resolution sometimes tinier
fonts are used. unfortunately, i don't know what the correct solution
for this problem is, if
If the screen resolution is the same in both computers, try Edit - Font in
your patch window.
Ricardo D.
On 16/02/2008, Roman Haefeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if the same os is some linux flavour, it is probably because of
different display settings that result in different font scalings. i
Hey guys,
Okay, I have a legit fink environment now with all Pd-extended
dependencies. There is a bug in the 0.28.0 release which prevented me
from installing Jack (something having to do w/ a virtual
dependency)... i cleared it out and installed Jack first, the rest
fell into place
Hi,
I just saw this email now, don't know how I missed it before, sorry-
yes, i am planning to improve the audio support in the next version,
though it will probably just be a buffer external and a player. right
now,
i don't plan on adding modular audio (like pd/msp). maybe if javascript
ever
Hi all,
three more bug fixes, including one I forgot to throw in the release notes:
I figured out why cutting/pasting text into boxes didn't work on
MACOS or Windows. The others: a crash bug on windows when restarting DSP
repeatedly, and netsend/netreceive sometimes dropping data.
cheers
Miller
Hi,
I'm new to both PD and Ubuntu.
I've been mainly using PD on Windows XP, but I've been trying to use
it on Ubuntu as well.
I noticed that patches I've created on XP don't quite work correctly
in Ubuntu. Why is this, and what can I do about it?
Also, I'm having trouble getting PD in Ubuntu
Miller Puckette wrote:
Hi all,
three more bug fixes, including one I forgot to throw in the release notes:
I figured out why cutting/pasting text into boxes didn't work on
MACOS or Windows.
thanks!!
I could think about other interface related changes:
for example when only one object
hello,
I have been searching for a clear tutorial on external installation and
haven't found one, if someone can point me to one, please do.
my question regards what libraries are included in pd extended .39-3
(looking for unauthorized in particular) and how do I load these at start up
as well as
What specific error messages are you seeing?
Are objects missing? Have paths changed?
Which versions are you using on the respective machines?
It could be more to do with that than the OS.
Locate errors by reading the console and using
Edit-Find Last Error
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:35:23 -0800
Okay, I was using .40-2. So I installed .39 extended, and solved one
problem: objects had been resized and everything was a mess.
That's okay now.
But some objects are missing, e.g. decimate~ from extra/sigpack. The
object is installed in /usr/lib/local/pd/extra/sigpack (with a
.pd_linux
-- Forwarded message --
From: Kevin McCoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Feb 16, 2008 11:02 PM
Subject: Re: [PD] what libraries are included in 0.39-3? and how to
install multiple externals?
To: bryan eubanks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yo b,
Are you on OS X, Win32, or Linux? Almost every
Does the sigpack library load when you specify it in the Startup
preferences? The .pd_linux extension is just a pd external binary for
linux. I have had problems like this before - try running pd with
verbose (pd -verbose from the terminal) and see what you get as far as
specific errors. This
I tried running pd -verbose from the terminal, but got the same
errors. It looks like at least some of the extended libraries are not
being searched, and that pd is not searching subdirectories of the
paths I entered.
I'm sure it is something simple, but being fairly in the dark about
both pd and
16 matches
Mail list logo
