i really wonder, how other projects handle that. i mean, if several
people download a big file from apache, then a disappearing client
doesn't interfere with the other clients. i guess, in apache it is
solved by using threads. when using threads, one single thread doesn't
necessarily need to
I think/hope that I managed to isolate the problem with writesf~ and
readsf~. There are two patches in attach that print out every step
that you take so one can't forget to click 'open' for example, it
also measures the time between the 'open' and 'start' command. Copy
these 2 patches in the
Hans Roels wrote:
I think/hope that I managed to isolate the problem with writesf~ and
readsf~. There are two patches in attach that print out every step that
you take so one can't forget to click 'open' for example, it also
measures the time between the 'open' and 'start' command. Copy these
Your debug approach is commendable Hans.
Notice that the EOF is different. It's not a well
formed file unless eof works. The problem, as stated
by another poster, is that the file appears zero length.
Mike
The errors are caused by bad message ordering in the patch.
I have highlighted where
hi,
I installed pd on ubuntu intrepid from official repositories through
installer manager, and everything worked fine. After, I needed
pd-extendend so I went on the pd website and I downloaded the
pd-extended contributed build for intrepid, at:
thanks a lot for this information, I added the [loadbang]-[; pd dsp
0; pd dsp 1( to my recording abstraction and after testing it a few
times, this seems more reliable.
Hans r
At 12:40 3/03/2009, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
Hans Roels wrote:
I think/hope that I managed to isolate the problem
Hello Athos,
The packages of Puredata (Ubuntu Repos) and Pd-extended are made in such
a way that only one can be installed at any given time. This is due to
conflict issues.
-Ilias
Message: 4
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:23:07 +0100
From: Athos Bacchiocchi athos.bacchioc...@tin.it
Subject:
PSPunch wrote:
From my understanding, the alternative to using multiple
threads/processes would be to set the socket to non-blocking and
implement a Pd object that buffers the messages requested to be sent.
Then attempts to retry sending what the OS once rejected should be made.
It seems
Ilias Anagnostopoulos ha scritto:
Hello Athos,
The packages of Puredata (Ubuntu Repos) and Pd-extended are made in such
a way that only one can be installed at any given time. This is due to
conflict issues.
Thanks for the help, but I still can't manage. I tried removing the
puredata
Hello, how can i evaluate 3d structures generated in puredata to know
if it can support itself if i build it in reality? for example imagine
that each structure is conformed by a group of boxes one over the
others made with repeat,i would like to add gravity and weight to all
the boxes so i
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, simeon cosik wrote:
Hello, how can i evaluate 3d structures generated in puredata to know if
it can support itself if i build it in reality? for example imagine that
each structure is conformed by a group of boxes one over the others made
with repeat,i would like to add
I don't know why anyone still uses iem.kug.ac.at... is it an old address?
Anyway, I re-send my reply just in case it's not getting through.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:53:34 -0500 (EST)
From: Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca
To: bra...@subnet.at
Cc: Pd
On Tue, 3 Mar 2009, bra...@subnet.at wrote:
Does anybody Know how to control a dot matrix printer troughout the
seriell port
First you need to install the [comport] class or any equivalent. It's best
to use my hacked version because none of the other versions can't handle
flow-control
Hey all,
The Google Summer of Code ((http://code.google.com/soc/) application
is due very soon, March 9th, and we need mentors! At this point, you
just need to put down your name. Then once the projects are in, we'll
choose projects and who will mentor them. You will then work with a
Hallo!
I started to put ideas together at the following WIKI page:
http://puredata.info/dev/summer-of-code/GoogleSummerOfCodeIdeas2009
If you are interested joining one project as a mentor, please just add
your name in the list of possible mentors ...
Please also add your projects using the
Hallo again !
I added now quite some projects from last year to the WIKI page:
http://puredata.info/dev/summer-of-code/GoogleSummerOfCodeIdeas2009
Please look through them and correct my bad english and/or add
additional resources and ideas !
@Hans: I added you to some projects as mentor, I
Hey Athos,
I don't remember if there is a menu item coming with the package. If
not, just start it from the terminal by typing:
pd
and pressing enter. You can manually add a menu item if there isn't one
with the package, at least until I (or anybody else) find enough time to
add one and
Hi Martin,
From my understanding, the alternative to using multiple
threads/processes would be to set the socket to non-blocking and
implement a Pd object that buffers the messages requested to be sent.
Then attempts to retry sending what the OS once rejected should be made.
It seems
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 18:51 -0500, Martin Peach wrote:
Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 22:53 -0500, Martin Peach wrote:
So I made [tcpserver] send the messages one byte at a time. This latest
version should not block, since it adds only one element to the buffer
for each
Ilias Anagnostopoulos ha scritto:
I don't remember if there is a menu item coming with the package. If
not, just start it from the terminal by typing:
pd
and pressing enter. You can manually add a menu item if there isn't one
with the package, at least until I (or anybody else) find
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 00:45 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
how do i know, when the [tcpserver] socket is ready to transmit another
byte? do i have to nag it every ms with a message? if i go the
BYTE-AT-A-TIME route, the interval would even need to be slower, if
higher troughput should be
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 00:45 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
how do i know, when the [tcpserver] socket is ready to transmit another
byte? do i have to nag it every ms with a message? if i go the
BYTE-AT-A-TIME route, the interval would even need to be slower
i either wanted to say 'lower' or
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 18:44 +0900, PSPunch wrote:
i really wonder, how other projects handle that. i mean, if several
people download a big file from apache, then a disappearing client
doesn't interfere with the other clients. i guess, in apache it is
solved by using threads. when using
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 08:08 +0900, PSPunch wrote:
The earlier sounds like to introduce massive overhead caused by TCP
headers, especially when we are speak of sending amounts of data that
may flood the socket's send buffer. In the later case, the OS may
indicate that bytes entered the
I made [httpget] for fetching webpages into pd:
httpget-help.pd
Description: Binary data
httpget.pd
Description: Binary data
.hc
http://at.or.at/hans/
25 matches
Mail list logo
