hi,
searching in the list archives I am getting results, but most of them do
not contain the search terms.
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/
marius.
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
hello,
one solution is to render your scene in a big framebuffer.
(if you use 3 screen of 1024x768, and a 100 pixel overlap, then you need a
3x1024-2x100 pixel wide framebuffer)
then render this frambuffer as a texture on 3 rectangle, using pix_coordinate
in order to keep only the desire part
On 2010-10-21 10:45, cyrille henry wrote:
hello,
one solution is to render your scene in a big framebuffer.
(if you use 3 screen of 1024x768, and a 100 pixel overlap, then you need
a 3x1024-2x100 pixel wide framebuffer)
then render this frambuffer as a texture on 3 rectangle, using
hello,
i don't have a ready made solution, but once you have a FB, nothing should be
very complex.
unless i miss the complex part of the problem.
if i've got 5 min later tonight, i'll try to make a soft_edge shader that can
deal with everything...
cyrille
Le 21/10/2010 11:11, IOhannes m
On 2010-10-21 11:37, cyrille henry wrote:
hello,
i don't have a ready made solution, but once you have a FB, nothing
should be very complex.
unless i miss the complex part of the problem.
it's not a complicated problem.
the most complicated part is the calibration to the actual projection
Le 21/10/2010 11:37, cyrille henry a écrit :
hello,
i don't have a ready made solution, but once you have a FB, nothing
should be very complex.
unless i miss the complex part of the problem.
if i've got 5 min later tonight, i'll try to make a soft_edge shader
that can deal with
Le jeudi 21 octobre 2010 à 12:01 +0200, cyrille henry a écrit :
Le 21/10/2010 11:37, cyrille henry a écrit :
hello,
i don't have a ready made solution, but once you have a FB, nothing
should be very complex.
unless i miss the complex part of the problem.
if i've got 5 min later
Hi all,
I'm a bit confused about the grain rate of [line]
the help says that 'the default grain rate is 20 ms'
however, when I connect a [delta] to a [line], it shows zero's,
while inserting a [speedlim 20] changes that.
also some other tests in attached patch.
can someone explain ?
Thanks,
Tim
#N
+1 on ben saylor's partconv~ - works excellently.
arm yourself with the free acousticas IR's...
http://www.acousticas.net/World/IRs/AcousticasM7.zip
of the $3,500 bricasti m7 unit...
http://www.bricasti.com/m7.html
...and you'll not go back to algorithmic reverbs again.
or just get some
On 10/21/2010 03:30 PM, tim vets wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a bit confused about the grain rate of [line]
the help says that 'the default grain rate is 20 ms'
however, when I connect a [delta] to a [line], it shows zero's,
while inserting a [speedlim 20] changes that.
also some other tests in
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:11:12AM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, tim vets wrote:
Hi all,I'm a bit confused about the grain rate of [line] the help says
that 'the default grain rate is 20 ms' however, when I connect a
[delta] to a [line], it shows zero's, while
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Frank Barknecht wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:11:12AM -0400, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Instead I used [b]-[fps, mode logical], is that what you mean ?
[t b b]
| |
[timer]
would be a line-rate-check that doesn't require any externals. See attachement.
But this
Hi!
Looking at power and air pressure - we don't have to care about them
as long as we don't want to include thermal effects
Isn't the heat proportional to the mean power ? Then you just do [*~]
with itself and then some kind of [rpole~] to account for the
accumulation thereof. After that
2010/10/21 IOhannes zmölnig zmoel...@iem.at
On 10/21/2010 03:30 PM, tim vets wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a bit confused about the grain rate of [line]
the help says that 'the default grain rate is 20 ms'
however, when I connect a [delta] to a [line], it shows zero's,
while inserting a [speedlim
2010/10/21 tim vets timv...@gmail.com
2010/10/21 IOhannes zmölnig zmoel...@iem.at
On 10/21/2010 03:30 PM, tim vets wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a bit confused about the grain rate of [line]
the help says that 'the default grain rate is 20 ms'
however, when I connect a [delta] to a [line], it
Hi Tim,
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 05:51:20PM +0200, tim vets wrote:
the way I understood it, [delta] is the equivalent of:
[image: delta.png]
I also don't know where I got [delta] from, it doesn't seem to have a help
patch associated with it.
Maybe it's the [delta] from maxlib. I attached its
sorry4delay but finally i got my hands free for testing it on an Arduino Mega(Atmega1280) with the new arduino21 feat.
firmata-2.2 Pduino-0.5beta8
__DigitalInput
Works all the way up to Pin 53 - all Pins corresponding to Pins number in
Pduino-test.pd
__DigitalOutput
Same here
__PWM
works for
2010/10/21 Correa Diego algorit...@labormedia.cl:
Maybe you would want to shorten it?
This is the body of the traduction:
Dear friends,
The second year of activities of Taller de Algoritmia
include new modules and applied knowledge in art
aesthetic as well as a more direct relationship with
Hey guys
So, I am working with a Max/MSP standalone application that sends OSC
messages through UDP, but it's not using any / signs in the beginning of the
message. So I'm getting the following in PD
unpackOSC: Path doesn't begin with /, dropping message
Like, a lot. It just ignores the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/21/2010 07:26 PM, Leandro da Mota Damasceno wrote:
Hey guys
So, I am working with a Max/MSP standalone application that sends OSC
messages through UDP, but it's not using any / signs in the beginning of the
message. So I'm getting the
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Leandro da Mota Damasceno wrote:
Like, a lot. It just ignores the messages because of the lack of the
/. Since the standalone application was made by Max/MSP users, they
ignored this apparent limitation on PD. In fact, I tried in Max/MSP with
a udpreceive object linked to
On 21/10/10 18:26, Leandro da Mota Damasceno wrote:
So, the question is... Is there any workaround I could try in PD?
|
[list split 1]
| |
/$1 |
| |
[list append ]
|
[list trim]
|
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
Si hay alguien mas en Puerto Rico que utiliza Pd o Max debemos encontrarnos
para compartir nuestro conocimiento y no estar siempre trabajando solitos
por ahi. Efectivamente hacer nuestro PR Patching Circle.
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and
This is awesome! Strickly so. Thanks!
How does partitioned convolution work?
Pierre
2010/10/21 saint sainti...@yahoo.com
+1 on ben saylor's partconv~ - works excellently.
arm yourself with the free acousticas IR's...
http://www.acousticas.net/World/IRs/AcousticasM7.zip
of the $3,500
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 19:39 +0100, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
On 21/10/10 18:26, Leandro da Mota Damasceno wrote:
So, the question is... Is there any workaround I could try in PD?
|
[list split 1]
| |
/$1 |
| |
[list append ]
|
[list trim]
|
This
Good to hear! Now we have to sort of the troubles with the Uno...
.hc
On Oct 21, 2010, at 12:16 PM, olsen wrote:
sorry4delay but finally i got my hands free for testing it on an
Arduino Mega(Atmega1280) with the new arduino21 feat. firmata-2.2
Pduino-0.5beta8
__DigitalInput
Works all
Hi again
(I reply to the list as well...)
Yeah, I now remember that the OSC address must always be a multiple of 4
bytes long. I also stumbled across this problem a while ago and wrote an
abstraction back then that does pad the the address of the OSC message
with zeros as needed. Insert it
Hi Roman
Thanks for the help. Actually, I did not write the code in Max/MSP, but I
think I will end up writing my own version of the application, because it
does need a lot of tweaking. It is funny to realize how Max/MSP can be kind
of agnostic towards that.
Well, I will try your patch. I hope
On 2010-10-21 13:26, Leandro da Mota Damasceno wrote:
Hey guys
So, I am working with a Max/MSP standalone application that sends OSC
messages through UDP, but it's not using any / signs in the beginning of
the message. So I'm getting the following in PD
unpackOSC: Path doesn't begin with /,
A perfect speaker will reproduce the sound exactly by transforming the
instantaneous voltage to a displacement in or out. That's called
'compliance' in the speaker biz. The ideal speaker has zero mass and is
totally rigid.
So nonlinearities will show up:
1 when the speaker is massive and can't
Dear Adriano,
thank you for posting this!
Have you already thought about registering with puredata.org and hosting
your great abstractions there, along with many excellent contributions
by other members of the pure data community?
best,
P.
Adriano Monteiro wrote:
Hi list,
I'm writing to
Hi!
On 21.10.2010 07:17, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Martin Schied wrote:
It shouldn't be too hard to do this integration with basic pole /
zero objects. A problem using integration only is the lack of
mechanical damping. A real speaker goes back to x=0 if no signal is
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Martin Schied wrote:
yeah, but this is often the case when messing things up in pd. I tried
rpole~ 1 with sinewaves first which worked as integrator, but already
had different results for the output of rpole~ if the wave started at 0
or pi/2 (which is logic, but I didn't
Hi!
I agree with Martin Peach in most points and want to add some sentences.
On 22.10.2010 01:17, Martin Peach wrote:
A perfect speaker will reproduce the sound exactly by transforming the
instantaneous voltage to a displacement in or out. That's called
'compliance' in the speaker biz. The
Hey list,
after Jonathan suggestion I made an update of my mediagrid abraction.
Now it doesn't set the dirty flag (by using coord message) so it will not
ask you to save every time you close it.
And also astupid issue whit filename and space as been solved.
You can download the new version at the
On 22.10.2010 03:10, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Martin Schied wrote:
yeah, but this is often the case when messing things up in pd. I
tried rpole~ 1 with sinewaves first which worked as integrator, but
already had different results for the output of rpole~ if the wave
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010, Martin Schied wrote:
I wanted to use a fairly high a 1 because then the phase for all
frequencies is approximately 90° off like for the ideal a=1. Using
slightly smaller factors and comparing input / output didn't satisfy my
expectations. maybe that would't matter at all
On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Martin Schied wrote:
Isn't the heat proportional to the mean power ? Then you just do [*~]
with itself and then some kind of [rpole~] to account for the
accumulation thereof. After that I don't really know what to do with that.
one could feed the output of
38 matches
Mail list logo
