Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency

2013-04-26 Thread IOhannes zmölnig
On 04/25/2013 04:36 PM, o...@onyx-ashanti.com wrote: Thanks for getting back to me do quickly. Is there a network audio object (s) that can output standard formatted audio? i've started writing an RTP infrastructure for Pd [1], though it currently only supports uncompressed audio. RTP is a

Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency

2013-04-26 Thread Charles Goyard
IOhannes zmölnig wrote: > i've started writing an RTP infrastructure for Pd [1], though it > currently only supports uncompressed audio. > RTP is a pretty standard protocol, and latency can go down to a few > ms. there are also RTCP components. May I add that firewalls have a tendency to kill RTP

[PD] batteries for audio cards

2013-04-26 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
hey folks, anyone have recomendations for battery packs for audio cards? wanna try some stuff going mobile, anybody doing that? Looking for some high capacity for my multiface/RME (takes 9-.12V, 2A) thanks ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and

Re: [PD] Issue with csoundapi~ on Pure Data

2013-04-26 Thread Rodolfo Cangiotti
Hello, I see no one is able to help me about this issue; anyway, it seems this issue occurs only with PD Extended v. 0.43.4 (I also reported this on PD's Sourceforge page). Using PD Vanilla v. 0.44, Csound API works but I can't set ASIO4ALL as audio driver. In this case, how can I solve the matt

Re: [PD] batteries for audio cards

2013-04-26 Thread Charles Goyard
Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > hey folks, anyone have recomendations for battery packs for audio cards? > > wanna try some stuff going mobile, anybody doing that? Looking for some > high capacity for my multiface/RME (takes 9-.12V, 2A) If it can take up to 13.4V (it's likely there's a voltage r

Re: [PD] batteries for audio cards

2013-04-26 Thread Antoine Villeret
hey, i got a car cigarette lighter plug adaptor with my RME fireface, so just take a 12V Pb battery from a teenager motorcycle and go ! if you need a lighter solution, look at LiPo battery from R/C model cheers a -- do it yourself http://antoine.villeret.free.fr 2013/4/26 Alexandre Torres Po

Re: [PD] batteries for audio cards

2013-04-26 Thread Pierre-Olivier Boulant
Same here! I'm just concerned some Li-ion/Li-po batteries do not have an over-discharge protection and this could be an issue if you try to recharge a Li* battery that's been drained beyond its inversion voltage. Ask Boeing about this... ;) I doubt this has been included in the RME sound cards

Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency

2013-04-26 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
- Original Message - > From: IOhannes zmölnig > To: pd-list@iem.at > Cc: > Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 5:21 AM > Subject: Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency > > On 04/25/2013 04:36 PM, o...@onyx-ashanti.com wrote: >> Thanks for getting back to me do quickly.

Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency

2013-04-26 Thread katja
Hi Onyx, What is your aim, do you want to entertain your (physically present) audience via smart phones instead of PA system? I have a similar quest pending: to send Pd audio from a wearable computer over wireless to PA system. It's simpler than your purpose (because it does not involve an intern

Re: [PD] batteries for audio cards

2013-04-26 Thread András Murányi
Hi, batteries have been used for field recording for quite a while. Some discussions on the topic: http://taperssection.com/index.php?board=4.0 These are told to be killer but not cheap batteries: http://www.idxtek.com/ András On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > h

Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency

2013-04-26 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
> > From: katja >To: "o...@onyx-ashanti.com" >Cc: pd-list ; Martin Peach >Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 4:08 PM >Subject: Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency > > > >Hi Onyx, > >What is your aim, do you want to entertain your (physically

Re: [PD] batteries for audio cards

2013-04-26 Thread Ricardo Lameiro
There are the Li-Fe batteries from rc planes or cars. This chemistry is more resilient and at the same time very little self discharge compared to li-on. They do have less kick out, but since you wouldn't need more than 2 or 3 amps you are more then ok. Search for chargers and batteries on hobb

Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency

2013-04-26 Thread Phil Stone
That's a fairly brilliant idea. No need for fancy audio-quality wireless units, either. Phil On 4/26/13 1:19 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: From: katja To: "o...@onyx-ashanti.com" Cc: pd-list ; Martin Peach Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 4:08 PM Subject: Re: [PD]

Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency

2013-04-26 Thread katja
Yeah, sending FUDI would be good. Or OSC. In case of synthesis, better send controller data instead of audio. In my case (sending processed acoustic audio input) that wouldn't work, but never mind. Katja On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Phil Stone wrote: > That's a fairly brilliant idea. No

Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency

2013-04-26 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
On Apr 26, 2013 10:08 PM, "katja" wrote: > > Hi Onyx, > > What is your aim, do you want to entertain your (physically present) audience via smart phones instead of PA system? Actually it a sonic space I want to explore. To play to people on their own personal "bionic ear". Click and listen. The s

Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency

2013-04-26 Thread o...@onyx-ashanti.com
> > Why not send FUDI to a box connected directly to the PA system? The sound space is the headphone s.I want to use the digital sonic space to play in live. And there Afr so many smartphones in circulation that it is viable as a presentation platform now. And if it isn't. I can always connect to

Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency

2013-04-26 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
> > From: katja >To: Phil Stone >Cc: Jonathan Wilkes ; pd-list >Sent: Friday, April 26, 2013 5:11 PM >Subject: Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency > > > >Yeah, sending FUDI would be good. Or OSC. In case of synthesis, better send >cont

Re: [PD] direct connection from pd to webrowser, low latency

2013-04-26 Thread Simon Wise
On 27/04/13 05:38, o...@onyx-ashanti.com wrote: On Apr 26, 2013 10:08 PM, "katja" wrote: Hi Onyx, What is your aim, do you want to entertain your (physically present) audience via smart phones instead of PA system? Actually it a sonic space I want to explore. To play to people on their own