On 13 Dec 2006, at 4:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry if i haven't follow all discussions on the subject,
but what is the status now of pd
on a 64 bits architecture?
more precisely, on an intel core duo
It was my first excursion into Linux so not realising the problems
(then lack of ti
Thanks for the bug report. I still need to fix the pthreadVC.dll
thing. Gem should be found, I'll check on that. As for the rest,
trying running the pd-settings.reg file, it says how to do that in
the README.
.hc
On Dec 19, 2006, at 1:31 AM, Vreahli the Audio Bandit wrote:
Heyas -
Looks quite nice, but I would like to see greater variation in the
sound. Perhaps in the final show, there will more other elements to
fill it out.
So this is the first big proof-of-concept for the mapping
collection. How did it work out? I have an instrument design that
I'll be work
Thanks for the report. Anyone want to do a universal build of the
flext externals?
.hc
On Dec 19, 2006, at 11:17 AM, Phil Stone wrote:
So far so good here for the OS X i386 version (running on a MacBook
Pro). Previously-noted "xsample" errors on startup ("misaligned
architercture...")
On 12 Dec 2006, at 11:23 PM, Miguel Cardoso wrote:
I don't understand very well how the preferences work. I removed
cyclone and added the mrpeach folder in pd Startup preferences and
its working now.
Is there a way to add the number of folders, since all the slots
are filled?
it seems yo
Hey Mathieu!
On OSX intel.
First I compile and get the error:
cc -DPD -O2 -Wall -W -Wshadow -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-unused
-Wno-parentheses -Wno-switch -I../../src -o lrshift~.o -c lrshift~.c
cc -bundle -undefined suppress -flat_namespace -o lrshift~.pd_darwin lrshift~.o
rm -f lrshift~.o
cc -D
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006, David NG McCallum wrote:
Then I get this error:
g++ $PWD/libpd.dylib main.c -o pd
/usr/bin/ld: /Users/david/downloads/desiredata-0.39.A.pre4/src/libpd.dylib
is input for the dynamic link editor, is not relocatable by the static
link editor again
I've included a fix for t
.-.
| http://artengine.ca/desiredata/download/desiredata-0.40.pre5.tar.gz |
`-'
DesireData 0.40.pre5 (2006.12.19) (-r desiredata; ./configure && make) :
*
hello,
i used embeded sensors : flex sensors and accelerometter.
the sensors are connected to a wifi sensors box and send to a computer over udp.
you can find pictures of the sensors system here :
http://drpichon.free.fr/ch/ecrire/upload/
the mapping strategy is usually like this :
sensors calib
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 00:33:39 +0900
"hard off" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it never finds my errors anyway :(
Maybe that means you never have any ;)
>
> ___
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata
http://aug.ment.org/readanysf/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anyone know an object to play soundfiles at different speeds in like
milliseconds i guess that doesnt draw from a buffer?
--
derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl
---Oblique Strategy # 65:
"Emphasize differences"
__
Very nice! I like the dancing too, very martial arts. How many cameras did
you use to track the motion, and what was their configuration? Or is that a
sensor strip on the floor? I'm curious about methodology, please tell more!
~Kyle
On 12/19/06, cyrille henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
he
hello,
here are few videos of movement sonification.
i used pd + the mapping abstractions for the relations between embeded sensors
and sound (or light).
http://drpichon.free.fr/ch/data/LAURE%20combat%20capteurs%20sons%20lumiere3.mov
http://drpichon.free.fr/ch/data/LILOU%20combat%20capteurs%20s
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 11:19 -0600, Michael Garrett wrote:
>
> I can not get the latency below 70 or so mSec, on a Core2, 2.6G
>
> Is it the port audio interface to ASIO that makes ASIO so slow??
no, it's miller's pablio to portaudio bridge
tim
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]ICQ: 96771783
http://www.m
Mathieu Bouchard a écrit :
Seriously, it's not really a problem to have any amount of latency
(even one million year) when there is a single musician.
If the musician can concentrate on the fingers rather than what is
heard, fine (but that needs to be a good player).
The musician don't have
hello,
i made more test.
i've got the same problem with an other fastlane midi interface on my computer.
i do not have any problem with this interface and pd on osX.
i don't have problem with a M4U midi interface on my computer.
so i think the bug is on the fastlane linux driver (at least under
I just thought I would chime in my under informed opinion
I can not get the latency below 70 or so mSec, on a Core2, 2.6G
Is it the port audio interface to ASIO that makes ASIO so slow??
Or is there something that I am not going correctly.
(This has probably been discussed a million time s
So far so good here for the OS X i386 version (running on a MacBook
Pro). Previously-noted "xsample" errors on startup ("misaligned
architercture..."), but otherwise clean and solid.
Phil Stone
UC Davis
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE a
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Patco wrote:
Mathieu Bouchard a écrit :
When the latency is changed, the musician has to retrain to a different
compensation delay, and that's more tiresome than not having to retrain.
Seriously, it's not really a problem to have any amount of latency (even one
million y
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, hard off wrote:
it never finds my errors anyway :(
No-one will be able to find them if you don't explain what's going on.
_ _ __ ___ _ _ _ ...
| Mathieu Bouchard - tél:+1.514.383.3801 - http://artengine.ca/matju
| Freelance Di
it never finds my errors anyway :(
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
m.weiss a écrit :
salut
ive played a little bit and found
this by trial and error
patch is attached
maybe it is possible to make this more elegant?
salut,
This would be more elegant if we wouldn't have to use an external for
doing this.
Patcu
Mathieu Bouchard a écrit :
When the latency is changed, the musician has to retrain to a
different compensation delay, and that's more tiresome than not having
to retrain.
Hello?
Seriously, it's not really a problem to have any amount of latency
(even one million year) when there is a single m
wait a second
what are these signal blocks like that you want to average over? Is
it in fact a continuous signal, or are they actually independent
measurements of the same (phase-locked) data?
(If it's continuous data, you probably do not want this kind of approach)
Chuck
second one, tha
24 matches
Mail list logo
