salut
maybe somebody may have a look at
http://www.weiss-archiv.de
the rephlex-tracks were made not only with pd
but it played a great part in makin sound
gruss
m.weiss
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
Hallo Hans+list!
I just added PDContainer to the build system and have some questions:
o) I have to use g++, otherwise I cannot link the binary - is this okay
for the compile farm ?
o) is it now, with the [declare] object, still necessary to make a
binary out of each pd object ?
(I made now
salut
ok here are direct links
these should do the trick
http://www.weiss-archiv.de/snd/weiss-01.rephlex.mp3
http://www.weiss-archiv.de/snd/weiss-02.rephlex.mp3
etc. till
http://www.weiss-archiv.de/snd/weiss-09.rephlex.mp3
enjoy
gruss
m.weiss
padawan12 schrieb:
I'd love to hear that, but have
hi,
i am using 0.40.2 on linux. adding a [namecanvas testing] in a patch
without GOP and sending bang - [vis 1] - [s testing] it's opening the
patch. now turning the GOP option to on = not working anymore (it
doesn't open the patch).
anybody can verify this?
pat
On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, patrick wrote:
i am using 0.40.2 on linux. adding a [namecanvas testing] in a patch
without GOP and sending bang - [vis 1] - [s testing] it's opening the
patch. now turning the GOP option to on = not working anymore (it
doesn't open the patch).
I don't know all the
yes it works very well.
these are wonderful pieces..
really. i really i really like them !
would you give any information how
you composed them ?
salut
alexandre
On 07/01/07, m.weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
salut
ok here are direct links
these should do the trick
Charles Henry wrote:
Maybe I'm missing the point here, but isn't Haskell a compiled (not
interpreted) language?
There are a variety of compilers and interpreters.
We can add any compiled function, wrapped in a
C-written external, just so long as we have the symbols for the
function from
Am 21.12.2006 um 09:59 schrieb IOhannes m zmoelnig:
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
That's not good. Any Gem devs want to shed some light on this
one? Is
there something missing in the Pd-extended Gem building setup?
./configure seems to not find anything:
used optional libraries:
I think I understand now. This is quite a bit more complicated than I
had thought at first.
Have I missed the point entirely?
http://claudiusmaximus.goto10.org/gallery/coding/hsext/first-non-trivial.png
The middle window in the top row is the entire source for the object.
hsext provides
Woohoo! Gem works!
One issue though - I can see rradical in the registry - it's been added,
but I think it's under libraries and not search paths - so I can't add
them. It's a registry fix I can do pretty easily - but it took me a bit
to figure out. Here's some verbose output of pd trying to
Great stuff, moody, fidgity electro, almost organic.
I like the way undulating grooves build up, a bit
like sound-on-sound tape loop technique.
What style would you use to describe this?
I notice the mp3 tags say 2004, and wonder what
amazing stuff you might be working on in 2007 :)
Thankyou
On Sun, 7 Jan 2007, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
Whatever it is, the distinction between compiler and interpreter has
been blurred a lot over the year: e.g. the Python interpreter compiles
code and saves it to disk, and also interprets the compiled code.
Typo, I meant over the years. Not much
i'm unsubscribing from: pd-list pd-dev pd-announce pd-ot
i will stay on: pd-cvs gem-dev gridflow-dev gridflow-cvs pdmtl dataflow (etc)
and also on IRC: #dataflow #desiredata
GridFlow questions are best directed to gridflow-dev
(http://lists.artengine.ca/mailman/listinfo/gridflow-dev) and
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 07:38:53PM +0100, m.weiss wrote:
http://www.weiss-archiv.de/snd/weiss-01.rephlex.mp3
http://www.weiss-archiv.de/snd/weiss-02.rephlex.mp3
etc. till
http://www.weiss-archiv.de/snd/weiss-09.rephlex.mp3
enjoy
m.weiss,
I totally love this album! Awesome stuff, beautiful.
14 matches
Mail list logo