Re: [PD] Hidden folders in PD open/save dialog

[Miller Puckette]

This would be a Good Thing ... I wasn't of the impression it would be easy
to do though.  I've been assuming that would necessitate writing, and then
having to maintain, a whole new open dialog widget.  If there's a smarter
way to do it I'd love to know about it.

cheers
Miller

On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 03:25:00PM -0500, Daniel Wilcox wrote:
> Ok,
> 
> Here's another todo for Linux I am willing to solve, along with drag and
> drop and better desktop integration: hidden folders in the file browser.
> 
> PD defaults to the home folder of the current user, which is full of hidden
> folders (.foldername) which are naturally listed fist.  This means that
> every time I go to open or save something I have to scroll the little
> browser window past these (non-)hidden folders to my visible folders.  Yeah,
> I know, its a small thing, but I always find it annoying.
> This is something that other applications which use the GTK-gnome file
> browser handle and hitting Ctrl-H toggles hidden file display.
> 
> I don't have a huge signal processing background, so I'll try and help in my
> own way :P.
> 
> -- 
> Dan Wilcox
> danomatika
> www.robotcowboy.com

> ___
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] mtx_* and similar on OS X

[marius schebella]

I am not 100% sure, but i think you need a library called hexloader to 
load these objects. (should load on startup with pd-extended. then mtx_* 
will know that it has to load äh...
I think you can also try mtx_mul.
marius.

Luigi Rensinghoff wrote:
> Hi List
> 
> i can imagine this was asked before..
> 
> i am on OSX and i was trying to go through pdmtl-abstractions
> i cam across
> 
> the mtx_* object which cannot be loaded...because it appears as somethin 
> like
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> how do i know which one is which 
> 
> this question might concern many other libs i guess...
> 
> even  ">~" or something might not load because of a similar issue
> 
> 
> bye
> 
> Luigi
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Best PD+OS/Hardware combinations for low audio latency?

[patrick]

hi,

search the archive for low latency on windows (playing with priority). but 
of course i recommand you to switch to linux with a realtime kernel. i have 
a firepod (firewire soundcard - using freebob / ffado) and my latency is 
very low, it's around 7 ms.

this is how i start pd -nosleep -rt -audiobuf 64 -jack

jack audio connection kit (low latency for soundcard).
you will need to play with priority in linux too (/etc/limits.conf - search 
the archive).
i would recommand to uninstall or disable updatedb.
use qjackctl to simplify your life.

pat






- Original Message - 
From: "Joe Newlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "pd-list" 
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 2:30 PM
Subject: [PD] Best PD+OS/Hardware combinations for low audio latency?


>I want desperately to be able to process guitar in "real time" with PD.
>
> I have a Sony VAIO laptop and Edirol FA-66 Firewire soundcard.
>
> It seems that using Windows is not an option, since I get outrageously
> high audio latency with PD, and a search through the mail list
> archives suggests that the consensus is that this is unavoidable in
> Windows.
>
> I'm trying to get the FA-66 working with Ubuntu, but I'm not quite
> smart enough to understand how to do this.
>
> What I'm wondering is:
>
> 1. What OS/hardware combinations have you found to result in low audio
> latency with PD?
> 2. Isit possible to accomplish this with Ubuntu and the FA-66, or
> should I give up and try something else?
> 3. If it is possible with Ubuntu, are there other resources for
> figuring this out, other than stumbling through web forums that assume
> I understand more than I do?
>
> Thanks for your help!
>
> Joe
>
> ___
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

[PD] mtx_* and similar on OS X

[Luigi Rensinghoff]

Hi List

i can imagine this was asked before..

i am on OSX and i was trying to go through pdmtl-abstractions
i cam across

the mtx_* object which cannot be loaded...because it appears as  
somethin like





mtx_strange.png
Description: application/applefile
<>


how do i know which one is which 

this question might concern many other libs i guess...

even  ">~" or something might not load because of a similar issue


bye

Luigi___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Best PD+OS/Hardware combinations for low audio latency?

[Patrice Colet]

Joe Newlin a écrit :
> I'd love to know specifically how you get the FA-66 to work on Ubuntu.
> 

maybe if you give a try with ubuntu studio, you will get freebob working 
good with qjackctl and pd



> I'm not even to the point of tweaking latency in Ubuntu yet - I need
> to get the soundcard to work first.
> 
> Previous Ubuntu forum posts are not been helpful, but I've started one
> of my own to try to get answers there as well.
> 
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 3:27 PM, PSPunch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Joe,
>>
>>  I also use an FA-66 on Ubuntu & Ubuntu Studio 7.10.
>>  There are many others using this combination. Although the firewire
>>  interfaces don't work straight out of the box, the required procedures
>>  are available in the Ubuntu forums.
>>
>>   From what I've seen, techniques in reducing latency under other audio
>>  apps with Ubuntu + FA-66 discussed there also apply to Pd.
>>
>>  --
>>  David Shimamoto
>>
>>
>>
>>  ___
>>  PD-list@iem.at mailing list
>>  UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
> 
> ___
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Best PD+OS/Hardware combinations for low audio latency?

[Patrice Colet]

  Hi,

Joe Newlin a écrit :
> Thanks for all the replies.
> 
> So far, in Windows: I tried setting the priority to Realtime in the
> Task Manager and setting the buffer size to "smaller" in the Control
> Panel settings for the Edirol soundcard, but could only get the
> "delay" in PD's audio settings down to 40 ms. Anything below that
> destroys the sound (in a bad way). And that's just for pure computer
> music, without even attempting to process a signal from the adc~.
> 

  The minimum asio buffer size of your firewire device needs to have 
half of the value in Puredata audio setting.

> I'll try the linux suggestions next...

  Linux will certainly make easier to try all features of PureData
> 
> JN
> 
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Joe Newlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I want desperately to be able to process guitar in "real time" with PD.
>>
>>  I have a Sony VAIO laptop and Edirol FA-66 Firewire soundcard.
>>
>>  It seems that using Windows is not an option, since I get outrageously
>>  high audio latency with PD, and a search through the mail list
>>  archives suggests that the consensus is that this is unavoidable in
>>  Windows.
>>
>>  I'm trying to get the FA-66 working with Ubuntu, but I'm not quite
>>  smart enough to understand how to do this.
>>
>>  What I'm wondering is:
>>
>>  1. What OS/hardware combinations have you found to result in low audio
>>  latency with PD?
>>  2. Isit possible to accomplish this with Ubuntu and the FA-66, or
>>  should I give up and try something else?
>>  3. If it is possible with Ubuntu, are there other resources for
>>  figuring this out, other than stumbling through web forums that assume
>>  I understand more than I do?
>>
>>  Thanks for your help!
>>
>>  Joe
>>
> 
> ___
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Best PD+OS/Hardware combinations for low audio latency?

[Joe Newlin]

I'd love to know specifically how you get the FA-66 to work on Ubuntu.

I'm not even to the point of tweaking latency in Ubuntu yet - I need
to get the soundcard to work first.

Previous Ubuntu forum posts are not been helpful, but I've started one
of my own to try to get answers there as well.

On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 3:27 PM, PSPunch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joe,
>
>  I also use an FA-66 on Ubuntu & Ubuntu Studio 7.10.
>  There are many others using this combination. Although the firewire
>  interfaces don't work straight out of the box, the required procedures
>  are available in the Ubuntu forums.
>
>   From what I've seen, techniques in reducing latency under other audio
>  apps with Ubuntu + FA-66 discussed there also apply to Pd.
>
>  --
>  David Shimamoto
>
>
>
>  ___
>  PD-list@iem.at mailing list
>  UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Best PD+OS/Hardware combinations for low audio latency?

[PSPunch]

Joe,

I also use an FA-66 on Ubuntu & Ubuntu Studio 7.10.
There are many others using this combination. Although the firewire 
interfaces don't work straight out of the box, the required procedures 
are available in the Ubuntu forums.

 From what I've seen, techniques in reducing latency under other audio 
apps with Ubuntu + FA-66 discussed there also apply to Pd.

--
David Shimamoto

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Best PD+OS/Hardware combinations for low audio latency?

[Joe Newlin]

Thanks for all the replies.

So far, in Windows: I tried setting the priority to Realtime in the
Task Manager and setting the buffer size to "smaller" in the Control
Panel settings for the Edirol soundcard, but could only get the
"delay" in PD's audio settings down to 40 ms. Anything below that
destroys the sound (in a bad way). And that's just for pure computer
music, without even attempting to process a signal from the adc~.

I'll try the linux suggestions next...

JN

On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Joe Newlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I want desperately to be able to process guitar in "real time" with PD.
>
>  I have a Sony VAIO laptop and Edirol FA-66 Firewire soundcard.
>
>  It seems that using Windows is not an option, since I get outrageously
>  high audio latency with PD, and a search through the mail list
>  archives suggests that the consensus is that this is unavoidable in
>  Windows.
>
>  I'm trying to get the FA-66 working with Ubuntu, but I'm not quite
>  smart enough to understand how to do this.
>
>  What I'm wondering is:
>
>  1. What OS/hardware combinations have you found to result in low audio
>  latency with PD?
>  2. Isit possible to accomplish this with Ubuntu and the FA-66, or
>  should I give up and try something else?
>  3. If it is possible with Ubuntu, are there other resources for
>  figuring this out, other than stumbling through web forums that assume
>  I understand more than I do?
>
>  Thanks for your help!
>
>  Joe
>

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Best PD+OS/Hardware combinations for low audio latency?

[patrick]

> Thanks for the reply. I'm hoping you'll help me clarify a few things.
>
> 1. " this is how i start pd" - does this mean selecting Startup from
> the File menu and typing "-nosleep -rt -audiobuf 64 -jack" in the
> Startup Flags field? Do I do this after the flags that are already
> there?

yes, using the pg gui (file - startup, apply, save) or editing 
defaults.pdsettings (in /usr/local/lib/pd) or .pdsettings in your home 
folder. this is on linux, i don't know how windows works.


> 2. "play with priority in Linux" - I have no idea how to play with
> anything in Linux. I search the English pd-list for limits.conf, and
> found 1 thread, which did not seem to have the information I need. Can
> you please tell me what specifically I need to do with limits.conf?
> (And where is it located?)

oups, my bad - it's located in /etc/security/limits.conf add thoses lines:
@audio - nice -10
@audio - rtprio 99
@audio - memlock unlimited

then yu should add yourself to the audio group. restart your computer.


> 3. I'm trying to use qjackctl. I enter Setup, and choose freebob as
> the driver. But I'm not sure how my firewire card is designated
> (plughw:0?). Or if it's even recognized by the OS.

this is a little bit more complicated. i suggest you look on google for post 
on this subject (for your audio card). you can use gscanbus to see if you 
soundcard if detected. but yes, basically in setup you checked Realtime, 
choose Freebob, interface default, frames / period (start with a big latency 
= 1024).


> Again, thanks for the reply. Linux is a little over my head, and I
> desperately want this to work!

good luck, from time to time i am on #dataflow (irc.freenode.net).
pat 

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Best PD+OS/Hardware combinations for low audio latency?

[Patrice Colet]

  Hello, did you try to reduce buffer size of your soundcard and then 
reduce buffer size in pd, and set pd to realtime in windows task manager?

  Also, did you try freebob+jackd+low-latency kernel combination in ubuntu?


Joe Newlin a écrit :
> I want desperately to be able to process guitar in "real time" with PD.
> 
> I have a Sony VAIO laptop and Edirol FA-66 Firewire soundcard.
> 
> It seems that using Windows is not an option, since I get outrageously
> high audio latency with PD, and a search through the mail list
> archives suggests that the consensus is that this is unavoidable in
> Windows.
> 
> I'm trying to get the FA-66 working with Ubuntu, but I'm not quite
> smart enough to understand how to do this.
> 
> What I'm wondering is:
> 
> 1. What OS/hardware combinations have you found to result in low audio
> latency with PD?
> 2. Isit possible to accomplish this with Ubuntu and the FA-66, or
> should I give up and try something else?
> 3. If it is possible with Ubuntu, are there other resources for
> figuring this out, other than stumbling through web forums that assume
> I understand more than I do?
> 
> Thanks for your help!
> 
> Joe
> 
> ___
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Best PD+OS/Hardware combinations for low audio latency?

[Roman Haefeli]

On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 12:30 -0700, Joe Newlin wrote:
> I want desperately to be able to process guitar in "real time" with PD.

cool! 

> I have a Sony VAIO laptop and Edirol FA-66 Firewire soundcard.
> 
> It seems that using Windows is not an option, since I get outrageously
> high audio latency with PD, and a search through the mail list
> archives suggests that the consensus is that this is unavoidable in
> Windows.

definitely not true. it certainly depends on what you consider high
latency. on windows with pd running on my built-in audio card, i could
use a buffersize of 14ms (in the pd media dialog, didn't measure the
actual round-trip). this might be too much for real-time processing a
live signal. however, with the hdsp rpm soundcard i could go down to 3ms
(still on windows). 
on linux (with old ubuntu dapper) i can go a bit lower with both cards.
(128samples buffer for jack, when running on the hdsp without x-runs)
without really knowing, i am tempted to say, that good hardware and
well-written drivers are more latency critical than the os. on windows i
had good experience with hdsp and motu cards.

> I'm trying to get the FA-66 working with Ubuntu, but I'm not quite
> smart enough to understand how to do this.

not that i am an expert, but from what i heard, firewire audio seems to
be harder to set up. don't know about the fa-66 in particular, but with
a decent linux os (ubuntu gutsy) and no fear to compile the necessary
driver yourself (freebob or.. what's its successor called again..?),
quite a lot of the fw cards are supported nowadays (i heard that someone
got a motu 824 card running).

> What I'm wondering is:
> 
> 1. What OS/hardware combinations have you found to result in low audio
> latency with PD?

ubuntu gutsy has a linux-rt package in its distro. setting up a system
optimized for audio should be quite easy on gutsy (at least from my
experience). check, if the new ffado driver (i think that's how it's
called) supports your card. 
regarding decent audio hardware, i am pretty much in favor of the hdsp
series. those are also pretty well supported under linux. 

> 2. Isit possible to accomplish this with Ubuntu and the FA-66, or
> should I give up and try something else?

i just checked the ffado supported harware page and your card is listed:
http://www.ffado.org/?q=devicesupport/list


> 3. If it is possible with Ubuntu, are there other resources for
> figuring this out, other than stumbling through web forums that assume
> I understand more than I do?

i never tried installing a ffado driver myself. personally, i would try
to compile it myself. but probably you find an external repository for
gutsy, that provides those drives as a package.

hope this helps.

roman




___ 
Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm. Hier gelangen Sie zum neuen Yahoo! Mail: 
http://mail.yahoo.de


___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] pdp_colorgrid bug

[lluisgomez]

hi,

pix_preview is just an experimental object in alpha stage ... actually  
only tryed on linux and it's really buggy, only works with very simple  
patches otherwise will crash pd.

i thing it has to do with overflow on the socket between the tk and  
gem processes  anybody can help on figure out this ??


for the pdp_colorgrid bug there is a new version with the pdvjtools  
which solves this problem, actually is only compiled for linux but it  
can be easyly compiled for macos ... Hans, how can i do to update this  
object on the extended version ?

cheers,
ll.


S'està citant marius schebella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> Thanks,
> there is cool stuff in pdvjtools, do you know if pix_preview is working
> on os x?
> marius.
>
> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>
>> That's because currently the background image is a file with a
>> hard-coded path.  So it'll only work if the app is called
>> Pd-extended.app, which the release candidates will be.
>>
>> .hc
>>
>> On Mar 29, 2008, at 12:18 PM, marius schebella wrote:
>>> hi (yves),
>>> I tried to look at pdp_colorgrid, but I only get a white background.
>>> I tested this with pd-0.40.3 (extended) and mac os x
>>> pdp version 0.12.5-darcs and pidip version 0.12.21.
>>> anybody else having the same problems?
>>> marius
>>>
>>> ___
>>> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
>>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
>>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>>
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>>
>> Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know how to
>> realize his wishes.  Now that he can realize them, he must either change
>> them, or perish.-William Carlos Williams
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ___
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->   
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>




This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.


___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

[PD] Hidden folders in PD open/save dialog

[Daniel Wilcox]

Ok,

Here's another todo for Linux I am willing to solve, along with drag and
drop and better desktop integration: hidden folders in the file browser.

PD defaults to the home folder of the current user, which is full of hidden
folders (.foldername) which are naturally listed fist.  This means that
every time I go to open or save something I have to scroll the little
browser window past these (non-)hidden folders to my visible folders.  Yeah,
I know, its a small thing, but I always find it annoying.
This is something that other applications which use the GTK-gnome file
browser handle and hitting Ctrl-H toggles hidden file display.

I don't have a huge signal processing background, so I'll try and help in my
own way :P.

-- 
Dan Wilcox
danomatika
www.robotcowboy.com
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] pdp_colorgrid bug

[marius schebella]

Thanks,
there is cool stuff in pdvjtools, do you know if pix_preview is working 
on os x?
marius.

Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> 
> That's because currently the background image is a file with a 
> hard-coded path.  So it'll only work if the app is called 
> Pd-extended.app, which the release candidates will be.
> 
> .hc
> 
> On Mar 29, 2008, at 12:18 PM, marius schebella wrote:
>> hi (yves),
>> I tried to look at pdp_colorgrid, but I only get a white background.
>> I tested this with pd-0.40.3 (extended) and mac os x
>> pdp version 0.12.5-darcs and pidip version 0.12.21.
>> anybody else having the same problems?
>> marius
>>
>> ___
>> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
>> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know how to 
> realize his wishes.  Now that he can realize them, he must either change 
> them, or perish.-William Carlos Williams
> 
> 
> 


___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] pdp_colorgrid bug

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

That's because currently the background image is a file with a hard- 
coded path.  So it'll only work if the app is called Pd-extended.app,  
which the release candidates will be.

.hc

On Mar 29, 2008, at 12:18 PM, marius schebella wrote:
> hi (yves),
> I tried to look at pdp_colorgrid, but I only get a white background.
> I tested this with pd-0.40.3 (extended) and mac os x
> pdp version 0.12.5-darcs and pidip version 0.12.21.
> anybody else having the same problems?
> marius
>
> ___
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
> listinfo/pd-list



 


Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know how to  
realize his wishes.  Now that he can realize them, he must either  
change them, or perish.-William Carlos Williams



___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

[PD] Best PD+OS/Hardware combinations for low audio latency?

[Joe Newlin]

I want desperately to be able to process guitar in "real time" with PD.

I have a Sony VAIO laptop and Edirol FA-66 Firewire soundcard.

It seems that using Windows is not an option, since I get outrageously
high audio latency with PD, and a search through the mail list
archives suggests that the consensus is that this is unavoidable in
Windows.

I'm trying to get the FA-66 working with Ubuntu, but I'm not quite
smart enough to understand how to do this.

What I'm wondering is:

1. What OS/hardware combinations have you found to result in low audio
latency with PD?
2. Isit possible to accomplish this with Ubuntu and the FA-66, or
should I give up and try something else?
3. If it is possible with Ubuntu, are there other resources for
figuring this out, other than stumbling through web forums that assume
I understand more than I do?

Thanks for your help!

Joe

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] robotcowboy spring tour08 info

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

Wow, that's quite a tour, too bad I missed you in NYC, I was in  
Cologne.  Looks like the people were having fun in the videos.  I  
like the extensive notes on your performance rig.  I'll be teaching a  
class, "New Interfaces for Musical Expression" next semester, mind if  
I use those notes in class?


.hc

On Mar 30, 2008, at 1:42 AM, Daniel Wilcox wrote:


Howdy all,

You may have remembered some information about my tour with my  
friend Laromlab back in January ...


Well, the tour is over and I sat down and put up a full synopsis  
including music and pictures.


You can check it out on my website.

All of my music is made in PD, with the only audio input being my  
digitar and helmet mic.


Oh, and thanks to everyone for PD ... it's awesome.

Cheers
--
Dan Wilcox
danomatika
www.robotcowboy.com
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
listinfo/pd-list




 



  http://at.or.at/hans/


___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] gem can`t load in my pd-extended-0.40-3

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

You could try searching the archives for  
"_glFramebufferRenderbufferEXT":

http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/

http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-07/051779.html
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2007-07/051762.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/pd-list@iem.at/msg06313.html


Try gem-dev too:
http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/gem-dev


.hc


On Mar 28, 2008, at 6:03 PM, Andres Ferrari wrote:
> hello:
> gem don`t loadany idea??
>
> mi info is:
>
>
> /Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/ 
> Gem.pd_darwin:
> dlopen(/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../ 
> extra/Gem.pd_darwin,
> 10): Symbol not found:_glFramebufferRenderbufferEXT
> Referenced
> from:/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../ 
> extra/Gem.pd_darwin
> Expected
> in:/System/Library/Frameworks/OpenGL.framework/Versions/A/OpenGL
> Gem: can't load library
>
>
> MY SYSTEM ANG GRAPHIC CARD INFO:
>
>  mac OSX 10.4 1.33GHz PowerPC G4
>
>  Graphic  Card Info
>  Vendor NVIDIA
>  Corporation 1.5 NVIDIA-1.4.0
>  Renderer
>  NVIDIA NV34MAP OpenGL Core features
>
> may be my graphic card driver is old, or my OSX update
> (from panther to 10.4)don`t update openGLI don`t
> know why!!!
>
>
> thanks a lot
>
> Andrés Ferrari G.
>
> http://puredata.org/Members/anfex
>
> http://www.myspace.com/anfex
>
> http://www.youtube.com/anfex1
>
>
>
> __ 
> __
> ¡Capacidad ilimitada de almacenamiento en tu correo!
> No te preocupes más por el espacio de tu cuenta con Correo Yahoo!:
> http://correo.espanol.yahoo.com/
>
> ___
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
> listinfo/pd-list



 


Terrorism is not an enemy.  It cannot be defeated.  It's a tactic.   
It's about as sensible to say we declare war on night attacks and  
expect we're going to win that war.  We're not going to win the war  
on terrorism.- retired U.S. Army general, William Odom



___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Connecting the UC-33 and pd

[marius schebella]

hi javier.
on osx you have pd-0.40... - preferences - midi settings that should 
store your settings. on other os, I don't know if that is available, but 
you still can do the following:
to see whats available in your setup open preferences - startup and add
-listdev
to the startup flags. that will printout your audio and midi devices on 
startup (later you can remove that again).
Then you can chose between a lot of startup messages (not only for midi)
Just fill them in at preferences - startup - startup flags..
Something like -audiooutdev 1 -noadc -channels 8 -midioutdev 1
-nomodiin -open /User/javie/pd/mystartpatch.pd
-audiodev: number of your sound output.
-noadc: turn off sound input, if you don't use it
-channels: number of channels
-midiindev: number of midi device
-midioutdev: you do not really need this.
-open: the patch that you want to open with the full path (better to 
have no spaces in the path, otherwise
try apostrophes.
marius.

Javier Garcia wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> when I want to control my pd patches with my UC-33 midi controller, i 
> must do these steps:
> 
> Open pd
> Media > ALSA MIDI
> Open ALSA Sequencer
> Connect UC33 with pd
> 
> Are four steps, not too much... but, Im wondering if there is any to 
> reduce them. You know, I would like to open pd and have the UC-33 and pd 
> connected without going to Media>ALSA midi and then going to the ALSA 
> Sequencer.
> 
> 
> Regards!
> 
> www.myspace.com/vjgarff
> 
> 
> Sigue de cerca las últimas tendencias y lo que más rompe MSN Vídeo 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Connecting the UC-33 and pd

[tim]

Javier Garcia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when I want to control my pd patches with my UC-33 midi controller, i 
> must do these steps:
>
> Open pd
> Media > ALSA MIDI
> Open ALSA Sequencer
> Connect UC33 with pd
>
> Are four steps, not too much... but, Im wondering if there is any to 
> reduce them. You know, I would like to open pd and have the UC-33 and 
> pd connected without going to Media>ALSA midi and then going to the 
> ALSA Sequencer.
>
>
Hi Javier,

What I do is make a little shell script to make the connection.
the command for connecting my uc33 to pd is something like:
aconnect 128:0 24:0
To see the connections you have just do : aconnect -lio.
Add the startup option -alsamidi in .pdsettings or .pdrc to start pd 
with alsa midi.
To be on the safe side, I put a few seconds delay between starting pd 
and connecting the alsa midi ports.

hope this helps,
Tim

> Regards!
>
> www.myspace.com/vjgarff


___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

[PD] Connecting the UC-33 and pd

[Javier Garcia]

Hi,

when I want to control my pd patches with my UC-33 midi controller, i must do 
these steps:

Open pd
Media > ALSA MIDI
Open ALSA Sequencer
Connect UC33 with pd

Are four steps, not too much... but, Im wondering if there is any to reduce 
them. You know, I would like to open pd and have the UC-33 and pd connected 
without going to Media>ALSA midi and then going to the ALSA Sequencer.


Regards!

www.myspace.com/vjgarff

_
Tecnología, moda, motor, viajes,…suscríbete a nuestros boletines para estar 
siempre a la última
Guapos y guapas, clips musicales y estrenos de cine. ___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list