Re: [PD] sms external

[Rich E]

Definitally am, although it will probably be all summer before there
are any pd externals.  This is because the first thing I'm doing is
taking old SMS analysis/synthesis code from
http://www.iua.upf.es/~sms/ (the one for SGI/NeXTStep that Xavier
Serra wrote for his Ph.D) and turning it into a library that works in
real-time on modern day platforms... then come the externals.  The
basic idea idea is to create a buffer that holds the model and allows
editing and extraction of the data, while there is a seperate
synthesis external that can operate in real-time on the buffer.  And
lastly, an analysis external that will work on a sound file or pd
array.

Also, I have been spending the last couple days finishing up a patch
called "Trax" that will do resynthesis of sinusoidal models in
real-time.  It just needs a little more cleaning up and I'll post it
to the forum..  but has its problems, which is why I'm going to be
working on the libsms stuff.

Glad to know there are others interested in this, and I would
appreciate any opinions, as there are many ways to approach this
project.

rich

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:17 AM, marius schebella
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>  some time ago someone (rich e) posted that he wanted to work on an sms
>  (Spectral Modeling Synthesis) external for pd
>  (http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2008-01/010709.html), just
>  curious if you're still working on it or if you come up with another
>  solution? thanks,
>  marius.
>
>  ___
>  PD-list@iem.at mailing list
>  UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] libraries:

[Ben Carney]

for some reason, deleting the preferences worked fine this time.
i swear i have done it in the past with no luck. must be doing something
wrong.

at any rate, thanks to all



-- 

Ben C.
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] bat path

[Patrice Colet]

hi,

Hans Roels a écrit :
> hello,
> 
> I have a question about starting pd from a batch file on windows 
> (xp). For example I have a folder called 'abunch' with a file 
> 'slice'. I add this folder in the .bat file:
> -path ../patch/own/les/abunch
> 
> When I start pd from this batch file and open a new file, and try to 
> load the object 'slice', pd can't find this.
> 
> If I add this same "../patch/own/les/abunch" in the pd main window 
> under File > path, press save settings and restart PD, I can load 
> this 'slice' object in a new file without problems.
> 
> What's the difference? What I see in the PD main window under path is 
> two times exactly the same!!!

not really the same, because the .. starts from where you start the bat 
file, for having this path to work you would have to start it from pd/bin

I usually put cd path\to\pd\bin before starting pd for avoiding this
> 
> (I'm using 0.40.2)
> 
> Hans r
> 
> 
> ___
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] externals with same names

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

On Apr 6, 2008, at 10:20 PM, Chris McCormick wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 10:53:14PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
>> Hallo,
>> IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>>> 2: don't use the full Pd-extended but strip it down to your needs (i
>>> personally use a barebone Pd and add 3 or so libraries - i still  
>>> have an
>>> overview about what is loaded...)
>>
>> I'm sometimes thinking about making a pd-condensed fork of pd- 
>> extended
>> which includes only externals and abstractions without  
>> nameclashes. ;)
>
> Same here! It would be good to have a distribution with a maintainer
> who is slightly less conservative than Miller about what goes in,
> but still keep it really tight. Maybe it would also be cool to see a
> "democratized" version of Pd where externals and libraries must be  
> first
> nominated and then voted in by some requisite number of positive  
> votes.
> For this to work I think we'd need to have people for each major  
> GNU/Linux
> distribution who would do the work of the actual packaging and  
> submission,
> separate to the building (My aims are totally selfish - I'd love to be
> able to apt-get install this).
>
> Even more talking with no action (sorry Roman),

Check out my posts about a new ./configure based system for building  
externals and custom distros, it would allow us to all work together.

http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2008-03/060833.html

This is all fine as long as it doesn't introduce incompatibilities  
and organizes the libraries so that it is compatible with pd-extended  
and pd-vanilla with libdirs. Otherwise, this project would just make  
the situation worse, there would then be three distros with different  
library layouts.  We really don't need to return to the bad old days.

I've been thinking more along these lines with Pd-extended anyway.   
What needs to happen is to establish a standard library format, then  
people can distribute the librs themselves, and they'll work with any  
Pd.  libdir is almost there, there I am going to try to finish it  
this month, adding support for embedded help files and examples.

.hc


>
> Chris.
>
> ---
> http://mccormick.cx
>
> ___
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
> listinfo/pd-list



 


If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem.



___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] libraries

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

I think no one has compiled fftease for Mac/Intel.  These have been  
folded into other libs:



iemabs: can't load library
iemmatrix: can't load library
liblist: can't load library



With 0.39.3, you are best off using the default prefs, so delete ~/ 
Library/Preferences/org.puredata.pd.plist


.hc

On Apr 7, 2008, at 3:55 PM, Ben Carney wrote:


chris,


this (Mac OS X 10.4 i386 (Mac Pro, MacBook, all Intel Macs) [md5])  
is the version i have been downloading from puredata.info


also chris, you are a former S.A.I.C graduate, am i right?



On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:19 PM, chris clepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  
wrote:
You need x86 versions of your libraries.  0.38.4 probably ran  
entirely under Rosetta emulation while 0.39 is Intel native.   
Downloading full pd-extended for OSX Intel should get the right set.


On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Ben Carney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello there all

Can anyone explain to me why libraries load so much better for me  
in the 0.38.4 version of extended compared to 0.39.?


All of my libraries load in the previous version, but in the new  
version, I get this.


/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/ 
fftease.pd_darwin: dlopen(/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/ 
Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin, 10): no suitable  
image found.  Did find:
	/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/ 
fftease.pd_darwin: mach-o, but wrong architecture

fftease: can't load library
iemabs: can't load library
iemmatrix: can't load library
liblist: can't load library
PDP: pure data packet version 0.12.5-darcs
PiDiP : additional video processing objects for PDP : version  
0.12.20 ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )


 I have tried alot of different methods of recognizing libraries to  
no avail.




--

Ben C.

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
listinfo/pd-list






--

Ben C.
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
listinfo/pd-list




 



Man has survived hitherto because he was too ignorant to know how to  
realize his wishes.  Now that he can realize them, he must either  
change them, or perish.-William Carlos Williams



___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] solitude

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

I am guessing you mean this:

http://at.or.at/hans/solitude/

On that note, now for a wee bit of self-promotion ;).  The score for  
Solitude was featured in a new graphic design book called "Graphic  
Design, The New Basics".  I never thought my crappy color and visual  
sense would ever make a graphic design book. Strange...

http://www.gdbasics.com/

.hc

On Apr 7, 2008, at 5:54 PM, johannes krause wrote:
> hi hans, hi list,
>
> where i can get the "solitude" patch?
> i was downloading it from pd site and was geting some
> mpeg stuff.
>
> thanx, johannes
>
>
>
> ___
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
> listinfo/pd-list



 


Computer science is no more related to the computer than astronomy is  
related to the telescope.  -Edsger Dykstra



___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] libraries

[Ben Carney]

marius,
Beginning my bad reputation in offending people on mailing lists, you may be
exaggerating a bit there. Yes, maybe in retrospect my question to C___ might
have been better off left off  of the public list. On the same token, your
bashing me might have been better off meant for just me rather than make a
spectacle of my error. Google anyone's name on this list and chances are you
can find out a lot more about them than where they used to go to school,
your name works well for this as well.  Some might say that this message
also should not appear on this list either. This is the last non pd related
post I will make, believe me. I find this list a breath of fresh air and
appreciate all who contribute very much. It is truly amazing that better
support can come from an open-source tool than commercial software. It seems
to me a somewhat tight and often friendly community and it might be great if
it could also be used for networking. My message to Mr. C_could be seen
as one such attempt to say hello to people who might be in the C area.

C thank you for your response, it is not my intent to offend anyone.

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 4:33 PM, chris clepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I wasn't dodging the question out of privacy, but rather to hide the shame
> of being affiliated with the place!  The only contact I have with SAIC is
> sending Wafaa Bilal bail money. ;)
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 4:28 PM, marius schebella <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Ben Carney wrote:
> >
> > > chris,
> > > also chris, you are a former S.A.I.C graduate, am i right?
> > >
> >
> > hey ben,
> > fulfilling my bad reputation in offending people on mailing lists, I
> > have to ask you; why don't you want to post also his private phone number,
> > bank account, creditcard number, address, ssn?
> > I think it is really bad style to post private information about other
> > people on a public forum...
> > marius.
> >
>
>


-- 

Ben C.
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

[PD] solitude

[johannes krause]

hi hans, hi list,

where i can get the "solitude" patch?
i was downloading it from pd site and was geting some
mpeg stuff.

thanx, johannes



___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] libraries

[chris clepper]

I wasn't dodging the question out of privacy, but rather to hide the shame
of being affiliated with the place!  The only contact I have with SAIC is
sending Wafaa Bilal bail money. ;)

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 4:28 PM, marius schebella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> Ben Carney wrote:
>
> > chris,
> > also chris, you are a former S.A.I.C graduate, am i right?
> >
>
> hey ben,
> fulfilling my bad reputation in offending people on mailing lists, I have
> to ask you; why don't you want to post also his private phone number, bank
> account, creditcard number, address, ssn?
> I think it is really bad style to post private information about other
> people on a public forum...
> marius.
>
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] libraries

[marius schebella]

Ben Carney wrote:
> chris,
> also chris, you are a former S.A.I.C graduate, am i right?

hey ben,
fulfilling my bad reputation in offending people on mailing lists, I 
have to ask you; why don't you want to post also his private phone 
number, bank account, creditcard number, address, ssn?
I think it is really bad style to post private information about other 
people on a public forum...
marius.

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

[PD] midi on 0.40.3-extended

[padovani]

Is anyone experiencing problems to play midi through QuickTimeMIDI on PD 
on Leopard (intel)?

I've tried three different versions of the 0.40.3-extended for Mac i386 
(after having tried the 0.39 version that crashed) and couldn't reach 
any Midi output device... other Apps play midi through quicktime with no 
problem...



___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] sms external

[Charles Henry]

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Jamie Bullock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  Heh .. when I saw the subject I thought this was going to be about an
>  SMS *messaging* external ;-)

Also, off-topic... maybe that could be possible on pd for iPhone SDK?
It could be fun, somehow.

Chuck

>
>  Jamie
>
>
>
>  On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 14:17 -0400, marius schebella wrote:
>  > hi,
>  > some time ago someone (rich e) posted that he wanted to work on an sms
>  > (Spectral Modeling Synthesis) external for pd
>  > (http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2008-01/010709.html), just
>  > curious if you're still working on it or if you come up with another
>  > solution? thanks,
>  > marius.
>  >
>  > ___
>  > PD-list@iem.at mailing list
>  > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
>  ___
>  PD-list@iem.at mailing list
>  UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] sms external

[Jamie Bullock]

Heh .. when I saw the subject I thought this was going to be about an
SMS *messaging* external ;-)

Jamie

On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 14:17 -0400, marius schebella wrote:
> hi,
> some time ago someone (rich e) posted that he wanted to work on an sms 
> (Spectral Modeling Synthesis) external for pd 
> (http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2008-01/010709.html), just 
> curious if you're still working on it or if you come up with another 
> solution? thanks,
> marius.
> 
> ___
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

[PD] bat path

[Hans Roels]

hello,

I have a question about starting pd from a batch file on windows 
(xp). For example I have a folder called 'abunch' with a file 
'slice'. I add this folder in the .bat file:
-path ../patch/own/les/abunch

When I start pd from this batch file and open a new file, and try to 
load the object 'slice', pd can't find this.

If I add this same "../patch/own/les/abunch" in the pd main window 
under File > path, press save settings and restart PD, I can load 
this 'slice' object in a new file without problems.

What's the difference? What I see in the PD main window under path is 
two times exactly the same!!!

(I'm using 0.40.2)

Hans r


___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] libraries

[chris clepper]

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Ben Carney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> chris,
>
>
> this (Mac OS X 10.4 
> i386
>  (Mac
> Pro, MacBook, all Intel Macs) 
> [md5])
> is the version i have been downloading from puredata.info
>

Odd that there would be PPC binaries in that.


> also chris, you are a former S.A.I.C graduate, am i right?
>

I can neither confirm nor deny that.
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] PD extended for Ubuntu gutsy : dependencies?

[niko]

hi
i had the same issue with dependencies on gutsy some days ago
maybe the system with autodetection still does not work as it should :)
greetings
nikola
Georg Holzmann wrote:
> Hallo!
> 
>> I just proceeded to the install of Pd version 0.3-extended-20080402 on
>> a friend's brand new ubuntu gutsy i386 install
> 
> Thanks for your report - did you install an autobuild version ?
> Because I just changed the debian packages in the latest autobuild 
> version which tries to detect the dependencies automatically ... so any 
> testing is very welcome ;) !
> 
> LG
> Georg
> 
> ___
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] libraries

[Ben Carney]

chris,


this (Mac OS X 10.4
i386
(Mac
Pro, MacBook, all Intel Macs)
[md5])
is the version i have been downloading from puredata.info
also chris, you are a former S.A.I.C graduate, am i right?



On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 2:19 PM, chris clepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> You need x86 versions of your libraries.  0.38.4 probably ran entirely
> under Rosetta emulation while 0.39 is Intel native.  Downloading full
> pd-extended for OSX Intel should get the right set.
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Ben Carney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello there all
> > Can anyone explain to me why libraries load so much better for me in the
> > 0.38.4 version of extended compared to 0.39.?
> >
> > All of my libraries load in the previous version, but in the new
> > version, I get this.
> >
> > /Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin:
> > dlopen(/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin,
> > 10): no suitable image found.  Did find:
> >  
> > /Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin:
> > mach-o, but wrong architecture
> > fftease: can't load library
> > iemabs: can't load library
> > iemmatrix: can't load library
> > liblist: can't load library
> > PDP: pure data packet version 0.12.5-darcs
> > PiDiP : additional video processing objects for PDP : version 0.12.20 (
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
> >
> >  I have tried alot of different methods of recognizing libraries to no
> > avail.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Ben C.
> >
> > ___
> > PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> >
> >
>


-- 

Ben C.
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] libraries

[chris clepper]

You need x86 versions of your libraries.  0.38.4 probably ran entirely under
Rosetta emulation while 0.39 is Intel native.  Downloading full pd-extended
for OSX Intel should get the right set.

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Ben Carney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello there all
> Can anyone explain to me why libraries load so much better for me in the
> 0.38.4 version of extended compared to 0.39.?
>
> All of my libraries load in the previous version, but in the new version,
> I get this.
>
> /Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin:
> dlopen(/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin,
> 10): no suitable image found.  Did find:
>  
> /Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin:
> mach-o, but wrong architecture
> fftease: can't load library
> iemabs: can't load library
> iemmatrix: can't load library
> liblist: can't load library
> PDP: pure data packet version 0.12.5-darcs
> PiDiP : additional video processing objects for PDP : version 0.12.20 (
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
>
>  I have tried alot of different methods of recognizing libraries to no
> avail.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Ben C.
>
> ___
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] libraries

[Ben Carney]

I suppose I should also mention that I am using an intel based macintosh
running 10.4.11

On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:46 PM, Ben Carney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hello there all
> Can anyone explain to me why libraries load so much better for me in the
> 0.38.4 version of extended compared to 0.39.?
>
> All of my libraries load in the previous version, but in the new version,
> I get this.
>
> /Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin:
> dlopen(/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin,
> 10): no suitable image found.  Did find:
>  
> /Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin:
> mach-o, but wrong architecture
> fftease: can't load library
> iemabs: can't load library
> iemmatrix: can't load library
> liblist: can't load library
> PDP: pure data packet version 0.12.5-darcs
> PiDiP : additional video processing objects for PDP : version 0.12.20 (
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
>
>  I have tried alot of different methods of recognizing libraries to no
> avail.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Ben C.
>



-- 

Ben C.
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

[PD] libraries

[Ben Carney]

Hello there all
Can anyone explain to me why libraries load so much better for me in the
0.38.4 version of extended compared to 0.39.?

All of my libraries load in the previous version, but in the new version, I
get this.

/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin:
dlopen(/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin,
10): no suitable image found.  Did find:
/Applications/Pd-extended.app/Contents/Resources/Scripts/../extra/fftease.pd_darwin:
mach-o, but wrong architecture
fftease: can't load library
iemabs: can't load library
iemmatrix: can't load library
liblist: can't load library
PDP: pure data packet version 0.12.5-darcs
PiDiP : additional video processing objects for PDP : version 0.12.20 (
[EMAIL PROTECTED] )

 I have tried alot of different methods of recognizing libraries to no
avail.



-- 

Ben C.
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

[PD] sms external

[marius schebella]

hi,
some time ago someone (rich e) posted that he wanted to work on an sms 
(Spectral Modeling Synthesis) external for pd 
(http://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-dev/2008-01/010709.html), just 
curious if you're still working on it or if you come up with another 
solution? thanks,
marius.

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] PD extended for Ubuntu gutsy : dependencies?

[Olivier Heinry]

Le Mon, 07 Apr 2008 15:02:01 +0200,
Georg Holzmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :

> Hallo!
> 
> > I just proceeded to the install of Pd version 0.3-extended-20080402 on
> > a friend's brand new ubuntu gutsy i386 install
> 
> Thanks for your report - did you install an autobuild version ?

fresh from the farm!

> Because I just changed the debian packages in the latest autobuild 
> version which tries to detect the dependencies automatically ... so any 
> testing is very welcome ;) !

maybe we could meet on the #dataflow irc and do some live X testing

++
O.

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] externals with same names

[marius schebella]

I am totally in for that, too. but how would you do it in practice? 
would you just rely on a fixed order of path variables which would 
ensure that a certain object is preferably loaded when you create an 
object, or would you just not ship some of the externals or rename them?
I always thought the biggest problem to solve the nameclashes was that 
nobody ever got an overview of which objects are really existing in the 
different libraries. now more and more people get involved and sift 
through the libraries, so it should be possible to find all nameclashes 
and vote one as the default for pd-extended.
what about an irc meeting maybe next tuesday 
6pm(EU)/12pm(east)/9am(west). and then the usual proceedings: wikipage, 
finding volunteers to implement it, lazy consensus and done. (sorry for 
my militant course, I know it will never work like that...)
marius.

Chris McCormick wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 10:53:14PM +0200, Frank Barknecht wrote:
>> Hallo,
>> IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
>>> 2: don't use the full Pd-extended but strip it down to your needs (i 
>>> personally use a barebone Pd and add 3 or so libraries - i still have an 
>>> overview about what is loaded...)
>> I'm sometimes thinking about making a pd-condensed fork of pd-extended
>> which includes only externals and abstractions without nameclashes. ;)
> 
> Same here! It would be good to have a distribution with a maintainer
> who is slightly less conservative than Miller about what goes in,
> but still keep it really tight. Maybe it would also be cool to see a
> "democratized" version of Pd where externals and libraries must be first
> nominated and then voted in by some requisite number of positive votes.
> For this to work I think we'd need to have people for each major GNU/Linux
> distribution who would do the work of the actual packaging and submission,
> separate to the building (My aims are totally selfish - I'd love to be
> able to apt-get install this).
> 
> Even more talking with no action (sorry Roman),
> 
> Chris.
> 
> ---
> http://mccormick.cx
> 
> ___
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 


___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] GEM does not open window

[cyrille henry]

hello,

try installing glx extension!

maybe with this line on your xorg.conf : 
Load   "glx"
in the module section.

cyrille



Birgit Gasteiger a écrit :
> Hello!
> 
> I am just starting with Gem and as I tried to create a window with the  
> object pd gemwin in one of the basic example files of the help  
> browser, I got the error:
> 
> Xlib:  extension "GLX" missing on display ":0.0".
> 
> I am using the nvidia driver on kubuntu 7.1.
> 
> Has anybody an idea how to solve this?
> 
> Thank you,
> Birgit
> 
> 
> ___
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
> 
> 

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] GEM does not open window

[Olivier Heinry]

Le Mon, 07 Apr 2008 14:45:09 +0200,
Birgit Gasteiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :

> Hello!
> 
> I am just starting with Gem and as I tried to create a window with the  
> object pd gemwin in one of the basic example files of the help  
> browser, I got the error:
> 
> Xlib:  extension "GLX" missing on display ":0.0".
> 
> I am using the nvidia driver on kubuntu 7.1.
> 
> Has anybody an idea how to solve this?

add this line to your /etc/X11/xorg.conf file:

Section "Module"
Load   "glx"
EndSection

Should work with the nvidia-glx-new driver.

Servus
O.



> 
> Thank you,
> Birgit
> 
> 
> ___
> PD-list@iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] PD extended for Ubuntu gutsy : dependencies?

[Georg Holzmann]

Hallo!

> I just proceeded to the install of Pd version 0.3-extended-20080402 on
> a friend's brand new ubuntu gutsy i386 install

Thanks for your report - did you install an autobuild version ?
Because I just changed the debian packages in the latest autobuild 
version which tries to detect the dependencies automatically ... so any 
testing is very welcome ;) !

LG
Georg

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] GEM does not open window

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

Birgit Gasteiger wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> I am just starting with Gem and as I tried to create a window with the  
> object pd gemwin in one of the basic example files of the help  
> browser, I got the error:
> 
> Xlib:  extension "GLX" missing on display ":0.0".
> 
> I am using the nvidia driver on kubuntu 7.1.
> 
> Has anybody an idea how to solve this?

do you have the nvidia-glx package installed?

do you have glx enabled in your /etc/X11/xorg.conf?
there should be an entry
   Load"glx"
in the 'Section "Module"'

do other openGL-applications work?
(e.g. try "glxgears" which is part of the "mesa-utils" package)

fgmasd
IOhannes

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

[PD] GEM does not open window

[Birgit Gasteiger]

Hello!

I am just starting with Gem and as I tried to create a window with the  
object pd gemwin in one of the basic example files of the help  
browser, I got the error:

Xlib:  extension "GLX" missing on display ":0.0".

I am using the nvidia driver on kubuntu 7.1.

Has anybody an idea how to solve this?

Thank you,
Birgit


___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] VOSIM - Voice Synth and similar

[Luigi Rensinghoff]

Hi Frank, thanks for your helpful remark...




Am 07.04.2008 um 12:57 schrieb Frank Barknecht:


Hallo,
Luigi Rensinghoff hat gesagt: // Luigi Rensinghoff wrote:


I came across that email, when i searched the archive list for voice-
synths for PD.

For a Project i would like to have a synthesized "singing" voice.


VOSIM is the name of a very basic algorithm for formant synthesis. I
posted an abstraction which does classical VOSIM a while ago called
vosim~.pd. To make it sing or speak, some more work is needed,


Would you mind posting it again ???

Well, i dont want it to really "sing", i would just like to have some  
"human-like" - sounds..that

are "synthesized" ... lets say "vocaloid"-formant sounds

i tried "flite", but thats to much "spoken" for my needs



however, and
you may be better of with some of the readymade speech synthesis
objects by Bryan.



Yes i saw that "vosim" patch mentioned, but i think it is not  
accessible anymore in the pd-archive...



Concerning [paf~], the readme tells that it is a Percussion  
Detector ??


Which README??


CVS-externals/by-author/tgrill/pd/extra/paf~

contents:


Paf is copyright (C) 1999 Miller Puckette.
Permission is granted to use this software for any purpose, commercial
or noncommercial, as long as this notice is included with all copies.

NEITHER THE AUTHORS NOR THEIR EMPLOYERS MAKE ANY WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR  
IMPLIED,

IN CONNECTION WITH THIS SOFTWARE!

 



This is the README file for the "paf" percussion detector.  This  
software

is available from http://www.crca.ucsd.edu/~msp as part of the "toys"
library.  - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--

have a nice day...

bye




paf~ as I know it it also a formant synthesis object (PAF for
"phase-aligned formants"). For patent reasons it's not part of Pd ATM.
It will probably come back when the patent expires (in 2010?). Check
Miller's book for a description of the algorithm and a slightly
limited implementation as an abstraction is part of the docs.

Ciao
--
 Frank Barknecht _  
__footils.org__


___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ 
listinfo/pd-list




>---<

Luigi Rensinghoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
skype:gigischinke
ichat:gigicarlo




___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Problem with dynamic creation

[Jack]

Le 7 avr. 08 à 12:51, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :

> Jack wrote:
>> I get the new autobuild 20080407.
>> Le 7 avr. 08 à 12:15, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
>>> Jack wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>> With the autobuild of PD-extended 0.40.3 - 20080406, when pd  
>>>> create  (from an abstraction) more than 230 objects dynamically,  
>>>> i get this  error :
>>>> ... couldn't create
>> Still doesn't work.
>>>> All was OK with the PD-extended 0.40.3 - 20080315.
>>>> With an other patch i do the same work and all works fine with  
>>>> the PD- extended 0.40.3 - 20080406 (the abstraction is more  
>>>> simple in this case)
>> Still work.
>
> well, in this case: does the more complex abstraction work with the  
> old autobuild (20080315)?
> if not, could it be a problem with your abstraction?
Yes, it works fine.
>
>
>>>> Any idea ?
>>>
>>>
>>> could you try the simpler abstraction with the new autobuild?
>> My simpler abstraction works fine.
>>>
>>> is the hexloader loaded? does it work without the hexloader?
>> Can you explain what is the hexloader ?
>
> it is a loader-external that allows for weirdly named objects.
> unfortunately, it introduces some problems with abstractions within  
> abstractions... but this does not seem to be your problem here.
>
> anyhow, you will notice if if is used by searching the Pd-console  
> for a string like "hex loader 0.1"
No trace about 'hex loader 0.1'
++

Jack
>
> fgmasdr
> IOhannes


___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] VOSIM - Voice Synth and similar

[Frank Barknecht]

Hallo,
Luigi Rensinghoff hat gesagt: // Luigi Rensinghoff wrote:

> I came across that email, when i searched the archive list for voice- 
> synths for PD.
> 
> For a Project i would like to have a synthesized "singing" voice.

VOSIM is the name of a very basic algorithm for formant synthesis. I
posted an abstraction which does classical VOSIM a while ago called
vosim~.pd. To make it sing or speak, some more work is needed, however, and
you may be better of with some of the readymade speech synthesis
objects by Bryan.

> Concerning [paf~], the readme tells that it is a Percussion Detector ??

Which README??

paf~ as I know it it also a formant synthesis object (PAF for
"phase-aligned formants"). For patent reasons it's not part of Pd ATM.
It will probably come back when the patent expires (in 2010?). Check
Miller's book for a description of the algorithm and a slightly
limited implementation as an abstraction is part of the docs.

Ciao
-- 
 Frank Barknecht _ __footils.org__

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Problem with dynamic creation

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

Jack wrote:
> I get the new autobuild 20080407.
> 
> Le 7 avr. 08 à 12:15, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :
> 
>> Jack wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> With the autobuild of PD-extended 0.40.3 - 20080406, when pd create  
>>> (from an abstraction) more than 230 objects dynamically, i get this  
>>> error :
>>> ... couldn't create
> Still doesn't work.
>>> All was OK with the PD-extended 0.40.3 - 20080315.
>>> With an other patch i do the same work and all works fine with the 
>>> PD- extended 0.40.3 - 20080406 (the abstraction is more simple in 
>>> this case)
> Still work.

well, in this case: does the more complex abstraction work with the old 
autobuild (20080315)?
if not, could it be a problem with your abstraction?


>>> Any idea ?
>>
>>
>> could you try the simpler abstraction with the new autobuild?
> My simpler abstraction works fine.
>>
>> is the hexloader loaded? does it work without the hexloader?
> Can you explain what is the hexloader ?

it is a loader-external that allows for weirdly named objects.
unfortunately, it introduces some problems with abstractions within 
abstractions... but this does not seem to be your problem here.

anyhow, you will notice if if is used by searching the Pd-console for a 
string like "hex loader 0.1"

fgmasdr
IOhannes

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Problem with dynamic creation

[Jack]

I get the new autobuild 20080407.

Le 7 avr. 08 à 12:15, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit :

> Jack wrote:
>> Hello,
>> With the autobuild of PD-extended 0.40.3 - 20080406, when pd  
>> create  (from an abstraction) more than 230 objects dynamically, i  
>> get this  error :
>> ... couldn't create
Still doesn't work.
>> All was OK with the PD-extended 0.40.3 - 20080315.
>> With an other patch i do the same work and all works fine with the  
>> PD- extended 0.40.3 - 20080406 (the abstraction is more simple in  
>> this case)
Still work.
>> Any idea ?
>
>
> could you try the simpler abstraction with the new autobuild?
My simpler abstraction works fine.
>
> is the hexloader loaded? does it work without the hexloader?
Can you explain what is the hexloader ?
++

Jack
>
> mfgasdr
> IOhannes


___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Problem with dynamic creation

[IOhannes m zmoelnig]

Jack wrote:
> Hello,
> With the autobuild of PD-extended 0.40.3 - 20080406, when pd create  
> (from an abstraction) more than 230 objects dynamically, i get this  
> error :
> ... couldn't create
> All was OK with the PD-extended 0.40.3 - 20080315.
> 
> With an other patch i do the same work and all works fine with the PD- 
> extended 0.40.3 - 20080406 (the abstraction is more simple in this case)
> Any idea ?


could you try the simpler abstraction with the new autobuild?

is the hexloader loaded? does it work without the hexloader?

mfgasdr
IOhannes

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

[PD] Problem with dynamic creation

[Jack]

Hello,
With the autobuild of PD-extended 0.40.3 - 20080406, when pd create  
(from an abstraction) more than 230 objects dynamically, i get this  
error :
... couldn't create
All was OK with the PD-extended 0.40.3 - 20080315.

With an other patch i do the same work and all works fine with the PD- 
extended 0.40.3 - 20080406 (the abstraction is more simple in this case)
Any idea ?

MacOSX.4.11 - PowerBook G4
++

Jack

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

[PD] PD extended for Ubuntu gutsy : dependencies?

[Oli44]

hello,

I just proceeded to the install of Pd version 0.3-extended-20080402 on
a friend's brand new ubuntu gutsy i386 install
I had to install manually

for Gem to load

libmpeg1
libmpeg3-1
libaviplay
libavifile-0.7c2
libmagick++9c2a

For PDP to load
libgsl0

for pidip:
libimlib2

Shouldnt they be treated as dependencies by apt and automagically
installed? it would then be all fine, as far as i understand the
package system.

Bye,

O.

___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] [list-order] to order a list

[Frank Barknecht]

Hallo,
Patrice Colet hat gesagt: // Patrice Colet wrote:

> Thank you! I've just been in need for that object to suppress recurent 
>   numbers in a list (maybe there is one liste object that is allready 
> doing it?), 

list-unique does that for direct repetitions (with configurable number
of allowed repetitions). For sorting a list of numbers, [sort] from zexy
is also nice, but it's nice to have a version as purepd patch.

Ciao
-- 
Frank



___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list