Hallo,
Georg Werner hat gesagt: // Georg Werner wrote:
can somebody explain why there is a 3rd rule of $-expansion: 'there is
no $0 in message-boxes'.
i stumble every now and then about it and it is IMHO not
self-explanatory. it is not hard to implement and wouldn't make problems
with
hello list, is there is a limit in the number of sssad abstractions that can be
used in a patch, im using 50 sssad abstractions in a patch and when i save to
a text file my pd crashes(but it still save fine the file), and then when i try
to load the textfile- preset it loads fine but i get
Yeah I know some ways to get around this with extended but I'm more into
the vanilla-way-of-life =)
I would love having a quoting method and/or an escaping character like \ .
Of course I have no idea about the difficulty to implement that and I
just found a message from Herr Puckette saying:
Hallo,
punchik punchik hat gesagt: // punchik punchik wrote:
hello list, is there is a limit in the number of sssad abstractions that can
be used in a patch, im using 50 sssad abstractions in a patch and when i save
to a text file my pd crashes(but it still save fine the file), and then
I just make this abs and help to transform message with space to
symbol using pure-pd objects.
Based on the list-abs list-l2s.
++
Jack
absforspace-help.pd
Description: Binary data
absforspace.pd
Description: Binary data
Le 7 févr. 09 à 14:14, y a écrit :
Yeah I know some ways to get
Thanks for your effort Jack, but somehow I cannot get your abstraction
working.
It also does not work if I try with a basic example without spaces in
the filename...
Am I missing something ?
(And [symbol] is part of pddp)
Cheers,
_y
Jack wrote:
I just make this abs and help to transform
Hello! i have a patch that has 3 gem subpatches, each one has complex iterative
structures , since each one should be visualized at a time, is it possible to
turn off the 2 subpatches that are not viewed at any time? im asking this
because having this 3 subpatches consumes all of my cpu because
On 07/02/2009, at 17.38, y wrote:
Am I missing something ?
does the Pd console tell you that list-drip was not created? list-
drip is part of list-abs.
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
Oops, of course !
I forget to attach it.
++
Jack
list-drip.pd
Description: Binary data
Le 7 févr. 09 à 18:00, Steffen Juul a écrit :
On 07/02/2009, at 17.38, y wrote:
Am I missing something ?
does the Pd console tell you that list-drip was not created? list-
drip is part of list-abs.
Hmm, it's weird !
Sending 0 to [gemhead] should stop all the process in the GEM chain.
Maybe you have other process in your subpatch ?
++
Jack
Le 7 févr. 09 à 17:43, punchik punchik a écrit :
Hello! i have a patch that has 3 gem subpatches, each one has
complex iterative structures , since
punchik punchik wrote:
Hello! i have a patch that has 3 gem subpatches, each one has complex
iterative structures , since each one should be visualized at a time, is it
possible to turn off the 2 subpatches that are not viewed at any time? im
asking this because having this 3 subpatches
Hi
I am very new to PD and DSP concepts.
So this will be hopelessly, awfully, basic :)
I have just started chapter 3 of 'The theory and technique of
electronic music'
which is excellent
However it raises a million questions in my head.. one of which
is how do I create an oscillator
No, I have list-abs in my path.
I will try to find some time later to post a non-working example patch
(but I must miss the obvious here...).
Cheers,
_y
Jack wrote:
Oops, of course !
I forget to attach it.
++
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
Hallo,
Geoff hat gesagt: // Geoff wrote:
Its really bugging me everytime I create an example from the book. I
feel I need to understand the fundamentals of how the basic objects
are created too.
It seems too easy for me to just use the phasor object provided,
But that's much more
Hi Frank, i discovered that the problem is not something specific in my patch ,
it also happenes in your sssad-example's patch: if you first load a preset and
then you try to save another one it always crashes. So if you first save a
preset and then load it , it works fine, but if you want to
Hi , is there any version of the smooth abstraction but without dsp objects?
i want to use for smoothing change of parameters on gem visuals and i would
like to have the pd dsp turned off.
Any idea of an abstraction that does the same without ~ objects or an object?
if not, which is the best
Hello list,
Sorry only in french :
Il se tiendra le 14 et 15 février prochain deux workshops Pure Data à
Mains d'Oeuvres à Saint-Ouen.
Le workshop du 14 février s'adressera aux débutants et celui du 15
février aux personnes qui connaissent déjà l'environnement.
11H 18H Salle STAR TREK
Thanks Frank this all makes sense up to
Note that you need to use a kind of fmod for floating point numbers
here, i.e. replace the % with a calculation to get the fractional
part:
fractional part of f = f - int(f)
Also add an additional 1 if you deal with negative numbers.
I can see
On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 06:16:49PM +0100, marius schebella wrote:
do your subpatches have a gemhead?
you can turn off the rendering of a gemhead by feeding it a simple 0,
use for example a toggle to turn them on/off.
and you can turn off parts of the gemchain by putting an [spigot] into it
Just installed Pd-0.41.4-extended-20090207-ubuntu-intrepid-i386.deb and
get no menus in the main window, rendering the whole thing useless...
Message in terminal window says:
tcl: /usr/lib/pd/bin/pd.tk: can't open script
invalid command name pdtk_pd_startup
If I try to quit then a dialog pops up
What about using pack and line? Simplest way in my book...
D.
Quoting punchik punchik punch...@yahoo.com:
Hi , is there any version of the smooth abstraction but without dsp objects?
i want to use for smoothing change of parameters on gem visuals and
i would like to have the pd dsp
Hallo,
Geoff hat gesagt: // Geoff wrote:
Thanks Frank this all makes sense up to
Note that you need to use a kind of fmod for floating point numbers
here, i.e. replace the % with a calculation to get the fractional
part:
fractional part of f = f - int(f)
Also add an additional 1 if
Hi,
Hi , is there any version of the smooth abstraction but without dsp objects?
attached a simple remake of smooth.pd from pixeltango without ~ objects.
Martin
ppd_smooth.pd
Description: application/puredata
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
23 matches
Mail list logo