Call for participation at the performance audio Blank Pages #7 et #8
Berlin – 05 and 06 of September - 2009
As part of the Nth Synthesis and Duo-THAM tour, we will organize two
Blank Pages session (#7 and #8) in Berlin. We search for sound artists
or musicians who work with the graphical
Hi,
this looks nice, but do you think it would pay off to put less bulky
formats online? Only the videos for Puckette take around 3Gb, I think
(don't remember anymore). Is the high quality really necessary?
I finally made arrangements to edit and post most of the interviews
Kevin and I
Hallo,
Ichabod hat gesagt: // Ichabod wrote:
Thanks for the responses! I've seen the filter patches in the RJ library but
haven't tried them yet; I guess I should.
Also, since Cyrille mentioned benchmarking, what's the best way to do this?
For rough benchmarking dsp objects, I generally
I vote for compressing the vids to :)
Takes ages to download a couple of minutes of an interview.
Cheers
Adrian Gierakowski
On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 01:31:25 -0700 João Pais jmmmp...@googlemail.com
wrote
Hi,
this looks nice, but do you think it would pay off to put less bulky
Hallo,
hm, ogg theora would be nice: Then one could watch it in Firefox 3.5
immediatly, and maybe even use in pdp. :)
Ciao
--
Frank
adrian.g hat gesagt: // adrian.g wrote:
I vote for compressing the vids to :)
Takes ages to download a couple of minutes of an interview.
Cheers
Adrian
For instance you could do a very straightforward:
ffmpeg2theora *.mov
for processing all mov files in a directory.
That should reduce the size to about 15 % of the original with a very
good quality/size ratio.
Kind regards,
Lorenzo
Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo,
hm, ogg theora would be
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 07:53 -0300, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
Alexandros Droseltis wrote:
Hello!
I discovered pd yesterday (0.42.3-0.pm.1 for openSuSE) and I am amazed!
I created some small mini installations by playing with it and reading
the very nice tutorial at pd-tutorial.com and the
Hi,
my laptop trio Endphase (http://www.endphase.net/) is going to work out
our archived recordings, so that we get decent stereo versions to spread
around. Since many of them are multichannel (from 4 to 8) in different
setups (not necessarily only 2d around the audience), we'll be searching
for
I am away from my office but will see if I can get someone to compress
the videos. I will have to do teh ogg myself but I canb probably get
someone to make lower resolution quicktimes.
On 7/20/09, Lorenzo lsut...@libero.it wrote:
For instance you could do a very straightforward:
ffmpeg2theora
Hi Joao,
It sounds like you need a stereo auralization of various multichannel
diffusion pieces.
One option is to make a binaural down-mix of the multichannel
material, although that has the restriction of only sounding good on
headphones. This would still leave a decision on where to
It sounds like you need a stereo auralization of various multichannel
diffusion pieces.
if that's the official name for it, yes, right.
Either way there are still various (essentially aesthetic/artistic)
decisions to make about the specification of the auralization.
So you might find
On Jul 20, 2009, at 4:07 PM, João Pais wrote:
It sounds like you need a stereo auralization of various
multichannel diffusion pieces.
if that's the official name for it, yes, right.
Not sure about being official but Auralization is at least a term
used in academic discussion and
Hi Joao,
Nick has mentioned the IEM Ambisonics library for binaural rendering.
I have updated my old website at the IEM (http://iem.at/Members/noisternig/bin_ambi
), which now points to the current release of the library provided
by Thomas Musil. The packages are pre-compiled for Win-XP /
Georg Holzmann has some great patches here:
http://grh.mur.at/misc/PdSpatialization.tar.gz
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Dear all,
I have five chimes. I've worked out the frequencies (using Audacity) of the
5 strongest partials of each chime. I now want to be able to work out how
to change the octaves of the various partials? My original intention was to
find the nearest midinote and just use those but after
Hey Jbz
I'm not sure if this is what you want, but if you convert a midi note to
frequency [mtof] then multiply by integers, you get the natural partials.
So if you multiply the outlet of [mtof] by 2 3 4 5 and 6. then you can change
the multiplication figure, etc. I think that's the effect
Unlike all the rest of the equal-tempered scale, octaves are easy, just
divide by half or multiply by two (or multiples thereof). If it's thirds
and fifths and all that, it gets a bit more complicated unless you are
into just intonation where the ratios are actually the ratios and
haven't been
Dear Mike and Andrew,
Thank you for your speedy responses, though I think I am not explaining
myself very well. I don't want to use mtof or ftom as these objects even
out my ratios. What I'm looking to do is create a scale (say 12 notes for
example) out of these ratio's with the possibility of
Still not entirely sure I know what you're after, so at the risk of
repeating myself, use the (just intoned) intervals here:
1, 1:1-unison;
2, 135:128-major_chroma;
3, 9:8-major_second;
4, 6:5-minor_third;
5, 5:4-major_third;
6, 4:3-perfect_fourth;
7, 45:32-diatonic_fourth;
8,
I'll be honest, this sounds a bit advanced. It's logarithmic and thus beyond me.
However...
Perhaps try to find a list of just temperament or world music scales and their
frequencies. See if any match up to the scale you're trying to achieve.
Andrew
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:52:24 +0200
From:
Hi Andrew,
it's really not so complicated, it's just simple math. If the root and
partial frequencies of his chimes don't fit any note in an existing
scale, then trying to squeeze them into one won't sound good. It's
also a lot of list-searching and ear-guessing to see what the closest
fit
Ha ha, yes it's late. Of course I meant minor third in my example.
Don't stand me against the wall for it.
D.
Derek Holzer wrote:
4, 6:5-minor_third;
5, 5:4-major_third;
I.e. major third = 6:5, and 6 divided by 5 is 1.2, so to transpose
up a
major third, multiply original
If he's trying to make a scale which sounds good with notes which have
non-harmonic partials (I don't have the original post to see whether the
listed frequencies are, indeed, non-harmonic), then he might be
interested in this:
Just FYI, looking at BT2,BT3 and BT4 I see that the ratios of the
first partials is pretty close to a major second. Also, the ratio of
the first and second partials is just about 2.64 for each of the tones
you have given, which works out to something like 1 octave + a 4th
(between the major and
How do these objects even out your ratios (or, I guess, what do you
mean by that)? Finding the difference between two frequencies after
converting them to a MIDI value allows you to work linearly instead of
logarithmically, which is just easier--well, for me anyway. For
example, after
Hi,
I put some pics online from Pdcon09 in São Paulo.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/23071...@n00/sets/72157621754454542
marius.
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
26 matches
Mail list logo
