Right, the idea of the exhibition is that people write up little
articles on cool projects that other people did.
.hc
On Dec 28, 2009, at 7:59 PM, ydego...@gmail.com wrote:
it's a work that Marc Dusseillier and Chun Lee
are developping there,
it's not my part to take any credits from that.
it's a work that Marc Dusseillier and Chun Lee
are developping there,
it's not my part to take any credits from that...
i just found it fun to patch with masks on ...
fun, fun, fun , fun's going on ...
sevy
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Add it to the puredata.info exhibition!
http://puredat
wow thanks Max,
you bought me some hours of sleep tonight!
:)
Sonia
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Max wrote:
> this?
>
>
>
>
> Am 29.12.2009 um 00:29 schrieb sonia yuditskaya:
>
> > Hello Again List,
> >
> > I was wondering, and sorry if this has been brought up before, is there a
> way to m
> On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 17:07 +0100, august wrote:
> > > My test patch used [env~]-[nbx] for testing and it showed '0' on all
> > > channels, while it definitely showed some output when playing using
> > > [readsf~
> > > 8]. I cannot test again right now, but it is already good to know, that it
>
this?
setandsend.pd
Description: Binary data
Am 29.12.2009 um 00:29 schrieb sonia yuditskaya:
> Hello Again List,
>
> I was wondering, and sorry if this has been brought up before, is there a way
> to make a message that is something like:
>
> [name $1 $2(
>
> where I can send variables t
Hello Again List,
I was wondering, and sorry if this has been brought up before, is there a
way to make a message that is something like:
[name $1 $2(
where I can send variables to $1 and $2 dynamically
and then send the message?
I am trying to make a kind of control panel for gemwin where you
Hans,
The gui rewrite version works fine on my computer, but I need
Pd-Vanilla/Extented for testing purposes. Not to mention, there are various
small bugs in the gui rewrite branch that make it difficult to use when I'm
making music.
The problem is also that the wacom external I am working with
yeah but I prefer to stick to vanilla (although it looks like
pd-extended improved quite a bit since 1++ years ago, congrats =)
I was also curious about using phase-mod (dsp-wise) without any signal
phase inlet in the oscillator.
cheers,
_y
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
You can use a clone
With Pd-extended, its best to use the default preferences, which will
load pdp and pidip. To do that, just delete your ~/Library/
Preferences/org.puredata.pd.plist.
pdp_v4l is Linux-only (v4l = Video For Linux). On Mac OS X, use
pdp_ieee1394.
.hc
On Dec 28, 2009, at 12:01 PM, Laura Sa
Add it to the puredata.info exhibition!
http://puredata.info/docs/sitedocs/AddingToTheExhibition
.hc
On Dec 26, 2009, at 10:23 PM, Kyle Klipowicz wrote:
Whoa.
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 11:05 PM, ydego...@gmail.com > wrote:
http://playaround.cc/Avatar
With Pd-extended 0.41.4 and later on Mac OS X, putting libs, objects,
and help patches into /Library/Pd should just work. It has
everywhere I have tested it. Please file a bug report with as much
detail as possible if it is not working for you.
.hc
On Dec 26, 2009, at 9:21 PM, jurgen
Try the 0.43/pd-gui-rewrite branch, with the new autotools build
system. I think it should build properly on Mac OS X 64-bit:
http://puredata.info/dev/PdGuiRewrite
If not, report problems here and I try to fix them and commit them.
.hc
On Dec 27, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Rich E wrote:
On I go
You can use a clone of Max's cycle~. [cyclone/cycle~].
.hc
On Dec 28, 2009, at 5:07 AM, y wrote:
hello
while trying to port some phase mod sc patches to pd, I realized
that [osc~] does not accept signal in its phase inlet (while sc's
SinOsc and max's cycle~ do).
what would be the best w
Hey Laura,
Based on what Yves said, it sounds like you need to install X11. It
comes on your Mac OS X DVD, or you can find it here:
http://puredata.info/docs/faq/macosx
.hc
On Dec 27, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Laura Sahin wrote:
Hello,
I've a question...sevy told me it's better to ask you wit
did you try pdpv4l2?
From: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [pd-list-boun...@iem.at] On Behalf Of Bart Koppe
[...@a-bort.org]
Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2009 6:05 PM
To: PD list
Subject: [PD] How to use /dev/video2 virtual video device in GEM
Hi,
I use /dev/video
make sure you have pdp_ & pidip set
also some are abstractions like pdp_charcoal & pdp_morhphology
good luck
pp
From: pd-list-boun...@iem.at [pd-list-boun...@iem.at] On Behalf Of Laura Sahin
[laura.sa...@gmx.at]
Sent: Sunday, December 27, 2009 1:17 PM
T
On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 17:07 +0100, august wrote:
> > My test patch used [env~]-[nbx] for testing and it showed '0' on all
> > channels, while it definitely showed some output when playing using [readsf~
> > 8]. I cannot test again right now, but it is already good to know, that it
> > works for you
ah yes, I have to admit that it's been a long time I didn't use pd =)
thanks to both of you !
_y
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
y a écrit :
hello
while trying to port some phase mod sc patches to pd, I realized that
[osc~] does not accept signal in its phase inlet (while sc's SinOsc and
max's cycle~ do).
so cycle~ act just like a tabread4~ with a sinusoid table?
what would be the best way to do phase modulation on
y wrote:
hello
while trying to port some phase mod sc patches to pd, I realized that
[osc~] does not accept signal in its phase inlet (while sc's SinOsc and
max's cycle~ do).
what would be the best way to do phase modulation on sine waves in pd
then ?
Something like this, perhaps:
frequenc
hello
while trying to port some phase mod sc patches to pd, I realized that
[osc~] does not accept signal in its phase inlet (while sc's SinOsc and
max's cycle~ do).
what would be the best way to do phase modulation on sine waves in pd then ?
thanks,
_y
ps: I'm using pd-0.42-5 on linux
21 matches
Mail list logo