Re: [PD] External to get boxes' informations

2010-04-21 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-04-20 18:24, Vilson Vieira wrote: 2010/4/20 IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at On 2010-04-19 19:09, Vilson Vieira wrote: Guys, is there any object (or any way to create an external object) to get informations about other objects on the patch at the moment (for example, the number

[PD] oscx help patches?

2010-04-21 Thread Matteo Sisti Sette
Hi, Are there help patches for dumpOSC, OSCsend, unpackOSC? If so, where can they be found? I have Pd Extended and the dll's are in the folders mrpeach and oscx; however, the help patches for the mentioned objects are not there (in oscx there's no help patch at all) thanks m. -- Matteo

[PD] Do not use OSCx. Use mrpeach's externals instead (was: oscx help patches?)

2010-04-21 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 10:14 +0200, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: Hi, Are there help patches for dumpOSC, OSCsend, unpackOSC? If so, where can they be found? I have Pd Extended and the dll's are in the folders mrpeach and oscx; however, the help patches for the mentioned objects are not

Re: [PD] Do not use OSCx. Use mrpeach's externals instead

2010-04-21 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-04-21 13:30, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: Roman Haefeli escribió: Do _not_ start to use the OSCx externals, since they are buggy and unmaintained. Use the OSC and net objects from mrpeach instead (packOSC, unpackOSC, routeOSC, udpsend, udpreceive etc). The OSCx externals are still

Re: [PD] Do not use OSCx. Use mrpeach's externals instead

2010-04-21 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 13:30 +0200, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: Roman Haefeli escribió: Do _not_ start to use the OSCx externals, since they are buggy and unmaintained. Use the OSC and net objects from mrpeach instead (packOSC, unpackOSC, routeOSC, udpsend, udpreceive etc). The OSCx

Re: [PD] Do not use OSCx. Use mrpeach's externals instead

2010-04-21 Thread Matteo Sisti Sette
IOhannes m zmoelnig escribió: another way could be to _not_ include help-patches, so people don't learn how to use them :-) Mm (maybe by completely removing the oscx subfolder from the doc/reference folder) anyhow, i have now added a deprecated line to these objects, so whenever

Re: [PD] Do not use OSCx. Use mrpeach's externals instead

2010-04-21 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-04-21 13:46, Roman Haefeli wrote: Absolutely.. Again, it seems just a matter of someone doing the work (tm) in the meantime i have added a deprecated message to the OSCx objects (right; i have written that 3 times in the last 15 minutes; i'll stop now) Roman ah, matteo: i

Re: [PD] Do not use OSCx. Use mrpeach's externals instead

2010-04-21 Thread Lorenzo
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: On 2010-04-21 13:46, Roman Haefeli wrote: Absolutely.. Again, it seems just a matter of someone doing the work (tm) in the meantime i have added a deprecated message to the OSCx objects (right; i have written that 3 times in the last 15 minutes; i'll stop

Re: [PD] oscx help patches?

2010-04-21 Thread Martin Peach
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: PPS: indeed there is no help patch for [unpackOSC]! however, you should be able to understand the object from unpackOSCstream-help.pd; i guess martin would gladly include a simple help if you could provide one. The help patch for [unpackOSC] is the same as for

[PD] routeOSC weirdness

2010-04-21 Thread Matteo Sisti Sette
Hi, I don't understand the behaviour of routeOSC (and OSCroute which behaves the same, but I won't use it:). It seems it only works with one-level arguments, that is: [routeOSC /foo] works as I expect: /foo 123 - 123 on first outlet /foo/bar 123 - /bar 123 on first outlet /anythingelse 123

Re: [PD] routeOSC weirdness

2010-04-21 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2010-04-21 14:53, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: Hi, I don't understand the behaviour of routeOSC (and OSCroute which behaves the same, but I won't use it:). It seems it only works with one-level arguments, that is: [routeOSC /foo] works as I expect: /foo 123 - 123 on first outlet

Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd?

2010-04-21 Thread João Pais
So maybe you need and want a shitty clarinet to achieve the objective you have, maybe you need a quite expensive one. Nevertheless, the point is what you do with it. The clarinetist of one chamber orchestra I've wrote for had to use a 'C' clarinette that sounded like shit to play all the

[PD] length in midifile

2010-04-21 Thread PF
hi how do i get note length information from [midifile]? i can't see it in the help file. thanks! ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd?

2010-04-21 Thread colet . patrice
anyway, whatever I'd say after this, the answer would be that I'm not a good musician, or that pd is not made for me, or even worth, that I don't have a good taste in music, etc... I think this is silly to enter into this, because I just want to contribute with my 'small' inputs, in spite of

Re: [PD] length in midifile

2010-04-21 Thread colet . patrice
there is no midi length message, only midi noteOn for begining and midi noteOff message for ending - Mail Original - De: PF potaxpo...@gmail.com À: pd-list pd-list@iem.at Envoyé: Mercredi 21 Avril 2010 17h31:09 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne Objet:

Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd?

2010-04-21 Thread Matt Barber
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:28:31 +0300 From: Jo?o Pais jmmmp...@googlemail.com Subject: Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd? Cc: pd-list pd-list@iem.at Message-ID: op.vbik1qu2vpc...@jmmmp-thinkpad.fritz.box Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed;      

Re: [PD] External to get boxes' informations

2010-04-21 Thread Vilson Vieira
2010/4/21 IOhannes m zmoelnig zmoel...@iem.at well, what iemguts can do, you can do in any other language (if you are willing to use the private interfaces in s_stuff.h, m_imp.h, g_canvas.h,...) now I got it. Is there a roadmap to make the facilities of iemguts a default feature at PD

Re: [PD] A bunch of revised help patches

2010-04-21 Thread João Pais
I replaced Pd's patches with yours, to see if slowly something to say comes up. one just did: what's the best way to improve the related obects section, send you a message? for example, snapshot~ should have vsnapshot~. and the latter should have sig~, as it is in the former. João

Re: [PD] A bunch of revised help patches

2010-04-21 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
Yeah, just send them to me and I'll fix them.  There are a few things I need to finish up in those patches in the next few weeks, after which I'll put my final revisions up and try to figure out what to do with them next. -Jonathan --- On Wed, 4/21/10, João Pais jmmmp...@googlemail.com wrote:

Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd?

2010-04-21 Thread João Pais
anyway, whatever I'd say after this, the answer would be that I'm not a good musician, or that pd is not made for me, or even worth, that I don't have a good taste in music, etc... you're being paranoid. and if someone do, you ask them why, in case it's worth it. My conclusion is that

Re: [PD] Do not use OSCx. Use mrpeach's externals instead

2010-04-21 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: another way could be to _not_ include help-patches, so people don't learn how to use them :-) And so that people don't know how to translate old OSCx-based patches to mrpeach-based patches ? It might not be such a good idea... _ _ __ ___

[PD] margins

2010-04-21 Thread Alexandre Porres
ok, what are the margins of canvases for? what happens when I change them? I see nothing... :( thanks ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Do not use OSCx. Use mrpeach's externals instead

2010-04-21 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 13:30 +0200, Matteo Sisti Sette wrote: A way could be to include help-patches (which are missing right now) and put a comment that read DEPRECATED in each of them. Absolutely.. Again, it seems just a matter of someone doing the

Re: [PD] nusmuk_audio WAS: Max Smoother Audio than Pd?

2010-04-21 Thread Mathieu Bouchard
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, João Pais wrote: if you need a program to mix tracks in a session, then there's no point in even thinking of programming something like that in pd, just use any of the very good programs around. There is a very simple and oft-overlooked point to reinventing such