Re: [PD] GEM camera angle-of-view 180deg

2012-04-15 Thread Cyrille Henry
Le 14/04/2012 20:44, Marian Weger a écrit : Thanks, Claude! The stitching process is really not the problem, as all this is already implemented in Extended View Toolkit [1]. oups, sorry, i forgot that EVT did also include this part. My problem is more the computational effort, that is

Re: [PD] [GEM] pix_external, OS X 10.7

2012-04-15 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
On 04/15/12 00:38, J Oliver wrote: are you sure that Gem is loaded before you try to load pix_example? Yes. Another Gem built in a 10.6 machine that works well otherwise. Pd reports loading it as usual: GEM: Graphics Environment for Multimedia GEM: ver: 0.92.2 GEM: compiled: Sep 21 2010

Re: [PD] [GEM] pix_external, OS X 10.7

2012-04-15 Thread J Oliver
Ok, so I just tried version 0.93.3 and autogen.sh fails with: configure.ac:582: required file `abstractions/gemdefaultwindow.pd.in' not found configure.ac:41: required file `plugins/modelOBJ/Makefile.in' not found configure.ac:42: required file `plugins/modelASSIMP/Makefile.in' not found

Re: [PD] [GEM] pix_external, OS X 10.7

2012-04-15 Thread J Oliver
Please ignore the previous message. I mixed up some files ... autogen.sh runs fine. pix_example compiles and loads fine now. However, it is a limitation that pix_externals need to be compiled with the same version of Gem. This prevents combining two binaries compiled with different versions and

Re: [PD] GEM camera angle-of-view 180deg

2012-04-15 Thread Marian Weger
use display list to optimise bus transfer. display list is the only i can imagine to optimised rendering. Cool. Thanks, Cyrille. I was not aware of that display-list thing. ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -

Re: [PD] [GEM] pix_external, OS X 10.7

2012-04-15 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
On 04/15/12 22:41, J Oliver wrote: However, it is a limitation that pix_externals need to be compiled with the same version of Gem. this is true. but there never has been a public API until Gem-0.93. for 0.93, i changed the Gem-API a bit, in order to make it hopefully more stable in the

Re: [PD] error: maximum object loading depth 1000 reached (was: pduino patches on pdx)

2012-04-15 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
On Apr 13, 2012, at 3:44 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 17:52 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote: On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 22:49 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: It would affect vanilla if you have the libdir loader running in it. Its related to that. I think I experienced once

Re: [PD] pduino patches on pdx

2012-04-15 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Basically every library in Pd-extended is in libdir format, and from what I've seen, most people have no problem using non-vanilla objects in Pd-extended. Yes, in 0.43 development there were some problems related to libdirs, but you got to break some eggs to make an omelet. Now everything

[PD] Pd-extended 0.43 builds for Mac OS X/PowerPC are back

2012-04-15 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
We now have Mac OS X/PowerPC builds again for Pd-extended 0.43: http://puredata.info/downloads/pd-extended/releases/0.43.1 Thanks to Greg Pond/Sewanee for setting up and hosting the PowerPC build machine. .hc ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list

[PD] two new strings in Pd-extended to translate

2012-04-15 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
As of tomorrow's build, there are two new strings to translate in the Preferences: - Real-time scheduling (originally was Defeat real-time scheduling) - Reset to Defaults Update them in Transifex if you want them translated in your localization:

Re: [PD] Feedback on PD-ext 0.43.1

2012-04-15 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Hey Raphael, Thanks for the bug reports! I'll answer inline: On Apr 11, 2012, at 4:44 AM, Raphael Raccuia wrote: Hi, I use pd (ext) since several years, and first of all, congratulation and thanks for this great project! Here are some bugs and problems I experienced. I run PD on Ubuntu

Re: [PD] [GEM] pix_external, OS X 10.7

2012-04-15 Thread J Oliver
On Apr 15, 2012, at 5:52 PM, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: this is true. but there never has been a public API until Gem-0.93. for 0.93, i changed the Gem-API a bit, in order to make it hopefully more stable in the future... Well, thanks for that and look forward to further developments on that