Re: [PD] check mail with pd ?

2014-02-05 Thread Chris McCormick
On 06/02/14 06:29, pured...@11h11.com wrote: > but pd is not really good with strings afaik Maybe soon: https://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/pure-data/ci/8a02332a5fb68edc2899e2f13513c77f0796d21b/ https://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/pure-data/ci/49ffcf8ba5cdde7660e82f1e190fcee7c6fa5627/ :) Cheer

Re: [PD] Legal restrictions for apps

2014-02-05 Thread Simon Wise
On 06/02/14 00:36, Dan Wilcox wrote: Short answer: yes, it's sufficient to provide the object files and static libs As far as my understanding of GPL& LGPL goes, you do not need to publish your app sources when using LGPL libraries as the "Lesser" part of the LGPL allows for distribution and is

[PD] OT: The Music of Bernard Parmegiani | London 21-23 March

2014-02-05 Thread peiman khosravi
Dear all, The website (http://lcmf.co.uk/) has been updated with the relevant information. Please spread the news. Best, Peiman *www.peimankhosravi.co.uk || RSS Feed || Concert News

Re: [PD] check mail with pd ?

2014-02-05 Thread Jonathan Wilkes
On 02/05/2014 05:29 PM, pured...@11h11.com wrote: yes possible, for example using py/ext with a script like this one: http://libgmail.sourceforge.net/ but pd is not really good with strings afaik If you use Pd and have a use case where you're controling both the sending and receiving of the m

Re: [PD] check mail with pd ?

2014-02-05 Thread Jack
Le 05/02/2014 15:35, Fero Kiraly a écrit : > is it possibile ? > > thanks. > > fero > > > > ___ > Pd-list@iem.at mailing list > UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list Just try it with [tcpclient] on Ubuntu an

Re: [PD] check mail with pd ?

2014-02-05 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2014-02-05 16:02, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2014-02-05 15:35, Fero Kiraly wrote: >> is it possibile ? > > > depends on what you really want to do. > > i've once written an MTA in Pd (that is a mail-server, as opposed > to the mail-client

Re: [PD] check mail with pd ?

2014-02-05 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2014-02-05 15:35, Fero Kiraly wrote: > is it possibile ? > depends on what you really want to do. i've once written an MTA in Pd (that is a mail-server, as opposed to the mail-client you want). communicating with an imap server is not very comp

Re: [PD] check mail with pd ?

2014-02-05 Thread puredata
yes possible, for example using py/ext with a script like this one: http://libgmail.sourceforge.net/ but pd is not really good with strings afaik à+ ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listi

[PD] check mail with pd ?

2014-02-05 Thread Fero Kiraly
is it possibile ? thanks. fero ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Legal restrictions for apps

2014-02-05 Thread Dan Wilcox
Ed, shortest answer: Don't use [expr] if your worried about this. They don't like it, but we can still *technically* use LGPL code like [expr] by providing the object files, which are of course useless to anyone who hasn't jailbroken their device or paid the $100 iOS dev tithe. Lots of apps use

Re: [PD] Legal restrictions for apps

2014-02-05 Thread Dan Wilcox
Short answer: yes, it's sufficient to provide the object files and static libs As far as my understanding of GPL & LGPL goes, you do not need to publish your app sources when using LGPL libraries as the "Lesser" part of the LGPL allows for distribution and is not viral. From GPL vs LGPL: > Th

Re: [PD] Legal restrictions for apps

2014-02-05 Thread Simon Wise
On 05/02/14 21:55, Ed Kelly wrote: Hi Dan, Miller et al. I'm still somewhat confused about the LGPL issues with regarding apps. Say I make an app that uses LibPd, and include an object or library that is licensed with an LGPL license. Would I have to include all source code for the app itself,

Re: [PD] Legal restrictions for apps

2014-02-05 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
On 02/05/2014 11:55 AM, Ed Kelly wrote: > Hi Dan, Miller et al. > > I'm still somewhat confused about the LGPL issues with regarding apps. > > Say I make an app that uses LibPd, and include an object or library that is > licensed with an LGPL license. Would I have to include all source code for

Re: [PD] Legal restrictions for apps

2014-02-05 Thread Ed Kelly
Hi Dan, Miller et al. I'm still somewhat confused about the LGPL issues with regarding apps. Say I make an app that uses LibPd, and include an object or library that is licensed with an LGPL license. Would I have to include all source code for the app itself, or would it be sufficient to provid