Re: [PD] keycode dropped/use of curly braces

2012-09-04 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-09-03 20:10, Thomas Grill wrote: > > Am 03.09.2012 um 17:44 schrieb IOhannes m zmoelnig: > >> >> curly braces are reserved in tcl (the language pd-gui is written >> in). displaying a "{" will make p

Re: [PD] finding objects ?

2012-09-04 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-09-04 05:08, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > Hello serg, I made an attempt to build a search engine awhile > back: http://puredata.info/Members/jancsika/searchandbrowseplugin would you mind adding that to the "download" section? fgmasdr IOhannes ---

Re: [PD] still missing from pd

2012-09-04 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-09-04 18:36, i go bananas wrote: > after more than 10 years, i still find it amazing that pd vanilla > doesn't have the following: > > 1) proper builtin resonant low and highpass filters. lowpass at > least, come on! > what's wrong with

Re: [PD] finding objects ?

2012-09-05 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-09-04 22:41, Miller Puckette wrote: > Pd vanilla starts and quits in 0.2 sec total. (1.6 gHz Core 2) -- > without GUI it can be done in about a millisecond (so you can use > Pd in a batch process and run it thousands of times if you want :) > -

Re: [PD] undefined symbol: logpost

2012-09-05 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-09-05 12:21, Ed Kelly wrote: > What is logpost? Is this a new (Pd-0.43) thing - I started with > Ubuntu studio installs of 0.42 yes, it's a 0.43 thing. fgmasr IOhannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment:

Re: [PD] managing complex gui

2012-09-26 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-09-25 23:53, ronni montoya wrote: > I forgot to mention that my patch has its gui elements in > different windows . so i was wondering : if its possible to > control the size and position of a group of windows or subpatches > from the langua

Re: [PD] creation arg, distinction between 0 and no arg, WAS Re: Splitting Objects

2012-09-26 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-09-25 22:22, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > If you use Pd-l2ork there is no need for dirty hacks. > > Using... > > [list append $@] > afaik, this is "standard" Pd-extended. fgmadfr IOhannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (

Re: [PD] creation arg, distinction between 0 and no arg, WAS Re: Splitting Objects

2012-09-26 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-09-26 17:58, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > Can somebody confirm this? Because the patch is still "open" on > the tracker: i'd like to keep it open for Pd-vanilla. fgmasdr IOhannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) C

Re: [PD] [OT] Portable webserver with static IP

2012-09-27 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-09-12 12:30, Olivier Heinry wrote: >> - or you have to setup a DHCP server on your mobile web server. >> *Big >>> mess* if there's already a DHCP server on the network >>> (likely). > Well, as a secondary server, *should* work fine > secondar

Re: [PD] loading sounds stops my audio

2012-09-27 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-09-27 14:45, Roman Haefeli wrote: > There is also a work-around by using [readsf~] within an upsampled > subpatch. Also this work-around has been discussed several times on > this list, so I probably don't need to give any more hints. probabl

[PD] [PD-announce] apt.puredata.info is back!

2012-09-27 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 last night hans and me finally setup a replacement machine for apt.puredata.info[1], the ultimate source for Pd-extended on Debian-based systems (Debian, Ubuntu, Linux/Mint,...)[2]. it is now hosted on the puredata.info portal/mailinglist server, cour

Re: [PD] Pd download page

2012-10-01 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-01 10:02, Charles Goyard wrote: > In these days of universal binaries for mac, the "All platforms" > wording is really misleading to newcomers. we should prepare ourselves for the time when apple decides to reveal their dark side and use th

Re: [PD] Can't create Gem window

2012-10-01 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-01 11:08, Ed Kelly wrote: > ...when I try to create a Gem window. Looking at a previous post in > the archive, setting the environment variable GEM_SINGLE_CONTEXT to > 1 does not change this. I'm stuck! GL screensavers are working > correctl

Re: [PD] Pd download page

2012-10-01 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-01 12:14, Charles Goyard wrote: > Sure, thanks. > > On a side note, it could be nice to have the link to the source > code for beta here: > https://puredata.info/downloads/pd-extended/releases/0.43.1 > i added a generic link to the downl

Re: [PD] Concatenating floats

2012-10-01 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-01 12:35, i go bananas wrote: > if you just use $1 for something like 07, then it will cut off the > leading zero (which in this case, you need) > > so might be best just to split everything into individual floats, > like: > > [ 1 9 7 8 0

Re: [PD] Concatenating floats

2012-10-01 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-01 13:23, Rick T wrote: > Thanks for the info but two issues that pop up when I try this are > 1) when I use zexy date and time object there's no option for > leading zeros so you can hook the [makefilename %02d] directly to [date]/[time].

Re: [PD] Pd download page

2012-10-01 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-01 15:42, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > Besides, the source link you added is pointless and misleading > because there is no source tarball on the 'latest' listing. Please > remove it. removed. sorry for any inconvenience. btw, isn't

Re: [PD] 32-bit/64-bit Pd-extended builds for all recent Ubuntu, Debian, Mint releases

2012-10-02 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-02 16:23, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > I just added Pd-extended beta packages to apt.puredata.info for > Ubuntu oneiric and precise, both 32-bit (i386) and 64-bit (amd64). > That means that apt.puredata.info now has 32-bit (i386) and 6

Re: [PD] array size (was Re: arraysize)

2012-10-02 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-02 17:15, Miller Puckette wrote: > 3. the upsampling inlet~ by default zero-pads its input. This is > incorrect as its DC gain is less than one. (Try using that as > input to a phasor~ for instance - bad surprise!) I want to change > the

Re: [PD] array size (was Re: arraysize)

2012-10-02 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-02 17:15, Miller Puckette wrote: > 2. There's no place in the pre-0.43 file format to alow specifying > individual box widths and font sizes; I put an "f" (=format) > message to the canvas object in 0.43 so that in 0.44 I can make it > set f

Re: [PD] splitting a list into pairs of two

2012-10-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-03 11:18, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > Hi all, I'm trying to get pairs of two out of a list using two > [list split] (I tried to reproduce the patch with ASCII, but it's > getting a bit complicated, so I've attached it). how about using [

Re: [PD] splitting a list into pairs of two

2012-10-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > >> But if my list has an odd number of elements, then I lose the >> last one, don't I? no. that's what the last outlet of [list split] is for. On 2012-10-03 11:58, Alexandros Drymoni

Re: [PD] Pdsend on Raspbian...

2012-10-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-03 13:55, Pierre Massat wrote: > Thanks for your help, it worked. I hadn't actually installed Pd. I > used "apt-get install pd" (it only installed puredata-core), > instead of "apt-get install puredata". ah, i was wondering about that. any

Re: [PD] Too many objects (but only in Windows)

2012-10-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-03 15:06, Ed Kelly wrote: > Hi list, > > I know you main devs have bigger fish to fry right now, but an > answer to (some of) my wierdness with Gem (in case you're > interested) -- the "unable to save file: too many objects" message, > and

Re: [PD] array size (was Re: arraysize)

2012-10-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-03 17:43, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > > > - Original Message - >> From: Miller Puckette To: Cyrille Henry >> Cc: pd-list@iem.at Sent: Wednesday, October 3, >> 2012 11:03 AM Subject: Re: [PD] array size (was Re: arraysize) >> >> Pr

Re: [PD] Pd-extended on the Raspberry Pi

2012-10-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-04 04:37, Epic Jefferson wrote: > Other than being crazy small, i encountered a problem with your > instructions. > > when i entered: debuild -uc -us "-bash: debuild: command not > found" # aptitude install devscripts debian lacks the

Re: [PD] Too many objects (but only in Windows)

2012-10-03 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-04 05:38, Ed Kelly wrote: > Thanks IOhannes, So there is some sloppiness in Windows, which is > hardly a surprise since it's not created with the integrity of a > *nix system. to be honest, this is not an "integrity-defeating sloppiness" in

Re: [PD] pd-extended 0.43.1 - objects not loaded

2012-10-08 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-08 17:12, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > [ezdac~] is part of rradical, which was removed because it had no > maintainer and had bugs. Try [output~]. I don't know mux~, > perhaps it was also in a library that was removed because of bein

Re: [PD] Strange bug with cup and moses

2012-10-09 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-08 22:39, Rick T wrote: > Link to youtube video that shows the strange behaviour > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIlxj-MOR0c would you mind explaining what the "strange behaviour" is? personally i don't feel very interested in being direc

Re: [PD] Strange bug with cup and moses

2012-10-09 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-09 10:03, Rick T wrote: > I added the trigger like you suggested to see if it would help, but > the strange behaviour still occurs, granted it is most likely that > I wired something incorrectly. They say a picture is worth a > thousand wor

Re: [PD] Strange bug with cup and moses

2012-10-09 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-09 10:03, Rick T wrote: > > * i also attached the pd file* > after a quick look: - - always, i repeat: ALWAYS, use [trigger] when you have a message fan-out (one outlet connected to multiple inlets) - - it would be better to construct you

Re: [PD] Strange bug with cup and moses

2012-10-09 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-09 10:03, Rick T wrote: > 1) moses and cup don't always start incrementing and filtering when > the patch is enabled. because the happen to miss your threshold. > 2) When the moses and cup section do work, after the "pd dsp 0" > command is

Re: [PD] compiling pluginhost~ on Ubuntu/Mint

2012-10-11 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-10 22:24, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > On Oct 10, 2012, at 1:18 PM, Jamie Bullock wrote: > >> >> Anyhow, to conform to the policies and conventions of the Pd svn, >> I've removed the headers and added the requisite instructions to >>

Re: [PD] pd 0.43 report

2012-10-14 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-14 19:33, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > >> - dynamic patching: i have this message: >> >> "editmode 1, mouse 12526 541 0 0, motion 12526 2000 0, mouseup >> 12526 2000 0 0, mouse 21 -500 0 0, mouseup 25 1999 0 0, cut, >> mouse 12526

Re: [PD] pd 0.43 report

2012-10-15 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-15 16:22, Mirko Maier wrote: > hi hans-christoph, > >>> I've found some deviations from previous pd versions in pd >>> 0.43 >> (extended) (on Win XP): >>> >>> - in previous versions, with the message "pd open [patch.pd] >>> [folder]/;" >>

Re: [PD] put the argument of an abstraction in a message

2012-10-15 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-15 17:39, Charles Henry wrote: > Just create an object [$1], send it a bang, and it dumps out the > 1st argument of the abstraction it's in. this really only works for floats. if the user calls [myabs moses], [$1] will evaluate to [moses] w

Re: [PD] 'save contents' in an array

2012-10-16 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-15 22:23, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > Ok, but if you save the patch after you've clicked on 'save > contents' in your array, shouldn't it save the patch with the > contents in the array? just enabling "save contents" is not enough. you a

Re: [PD] 'save contents' in an array

2012-10-16 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-16 08:55, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > Yes, I'm aware of all this saving contents issues. What I did was > clicking on 'save contents' and the load some sound and I was > getting this message: warning: array array1: clearing save-in-patch

Re: [PD] 'save contents' in an array

2012-10-16 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-16 09:11, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > So simply hitting return won't do the job? oh, simply hitting return should be the same as clicking "OK". fgmasdr IOhannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: U

Re: [PD] 'save contents' in an array

2012-10-16 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-16 09:13, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2012-10-16 09:11, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: >> So simply hitting return won't do the job? > > oh, simply hitting return should be the same as clicking "OK". i w

Re: [PD] firewire is dead?

2012-10-16 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-16 01:17, patrick wrote: > hi all, > > i have a firepod 1010 firewire soundcard, i am using linux / jack. > the new motherboard doesn't have firewire. what to do? just yesterday i was searching for some expansion card and discovered a whol

Re: [PD] OT: Partition space for ubuntu distro?

2012-10-18 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-18 09:55, Charles Goyard wrote: > >>> - anything else I should consider? > > Get a ssd drive. That's the main bottleneck on these computers. My > thinkpad got to boot to X from 15s to 6s just by changing the > drive. Switching to systemd

Re: [PD] fexpr~

2012-10-24 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-24 07:18, Billy King wrote: > could anyone help by explaining the use of the fexpr~? how is it > different from the expr~ ? [fexpr~] allows you to access past samples, so you can build filters and the like. [expr~] only works on the "curren

Re: [PD] close all patches on quit sourceforge patch

2012-10-25 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-25 06:18, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > yup: > > hans@palatschinken bin $ dpkg -l tkpng > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | > Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend > > |/ Err?=(none)/R

Re: [PD] firm delay scheduling

2012-10-31 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-30 18:13, Jean-Marie Adrien wrote: > Hello I'm trying to launch security procedures in case of trouble, > that will respond in less than 250 msec. The fundamental question > is : > > Is there an object to schedule an event in the future w

Re: [PD] MIDI and JACK autoconnection is a PITA...

2012-10-31 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-31 11:41, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: >>> or does it also affect jack audio connections? I'd like to try >>> to fix this but never use jack so am not sure where to start. > > maybe a startup flag and/or preference (off by default)? > i think i

Re: [PD] MIDI and JACK autoconnection is a PITA...

2012-10-31 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-10-31 12:10, Kaj Ailomaa wrote: > >> I would vote for adding a toggle for this in pd jack setup. > just to be nitpicky (and i have to admit that this is something that should have been said right from the beginning): the alsa-midi part has e

Re: [PD] Licensing issues (was rjdj is gone, robotcowboy is coming ...)

2012-11-05 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-11-04 14:40, Ed Kelly wrote: > My 2pence worth: Miller's original Pd was licensed to MAX and > became MSP (oh, the irony) and this could only happen because Pd is > BSD (not GPL) licensed distribution. where is the irony? cycling74 did *not* s

[PD] [PD-announce] LiveCoding symposium in Mexico City...

2012-11-05 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 there is a symposium on LiveCoding in Mexico City from 13th to 16th of november 2013. http://vivo2012.cenart.tv/ in case you are around fgmsdr IOhannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mo

Re: [PD] Licensing issues (was rjdj is gone, robotcowboy is coming ...)

2012-11-06 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-11-06 10:31, Ed Kelly wrote: >> where is the irony? cycling74 did *not* steal any code. >> > Perhaps...that it is ironic that after not being able to use the > Max code, the thing he develops becomes part of Max. Perhaps ironic > is the wrong

Re: [PD] Limit bandwith for MIDI output / precise metro

2012-11-26 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-11-26 17:19, Miller Puckette wrote: > at all you might be able to run Pd -nosound -udiobuf 5 -slepgrain 1 > or if that gives you trouble, try the flags "-nosound -audiobuf 5 -sleepgrain 1" :-) fgmasdr IOhannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Ve

Re: [PD] turn off object bar in pd-extended 0.43

2012-11-26 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-11-26 16:06, Dan Wilcox wrote: > Sorry, I didn't mean to sound like I was complaining. I was just > wondering if there was some mechanism to enable/disable plugins > without requiring manually adding/deleting the tcl scripts. Yes I > know I cou

Re: [PD] 2 color questions in GEM

2012-11-27 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-11-27 04:47, chris clepper wrote: > The color values should probably be between 0.0 and 1.0 in floating > point. Try 1.0 0.65 0.0 > > Also, use [text3d] instead of 2d. and [color] is the object the change the color of an object. fgmasdr IOha

Re: [PD] turn off object bar in pd-extended 0.43

2012-11-27 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-11-26 22:33, András Murányi wrote: > It's me who maintains it (BTW don't send bugs to the bug tracker as > the plugin is not part of the distro). the bug-tracker has nothing todo with a "distro" (neither Pd-vanilla, nor Pd-extended) it's a ser

Re: [PD] Limit bandwith for MIDI output / precise metro

2012-11-27 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-11-26 23:29, Cyrille Henry wrote: > > > Le 26/11/2012 22:38, Jean-Marie Adrien a écrit : >> Thanks Miller ! >>> -nosound -udiobuf 5 -slepgrain 1 >> Definitely academic :) >> >> But I run intense audio on this PD instance, together with midi

Re: [PD] Limit bandwith for MIDI output / precise metro

2012-11-27 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-11-27 18:06, Miller Puckette wrote: > better on some underlying OS time-tagging mechanism (for instance > by exploiting whatever portmidi does). But I have to admit I've > never treated this as a high priority (which one might take as an > imp

Re: [PD] UTF-8 failing - Ubuntu 12.04.1 64bits

2012-12-17 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-12-17 14:25, Esteban Viveros wrote: > I'm using this deb downloaded from pd page: > > Pd Version: 0.43.4-extended-20121216 Tcl Version: 8.5.11 > > The deb is precise amd64 version. > what's the problem? what do you mean with "UTF-8 failing"

Re: [PD] gem opengl-es by dmotd

2012-12-18 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2012-12-18 18:37, me.grimm wrote: > so whatever happened to this? its been asked i think recently with > not answer afaik. there was this initial discussion here: > > http://markmail.org/message/ermo45obdxmad5b6#query:+page:1+mid:2m33uflrdcciugat+s

Re: [PD] [text2d] background color

2013-01-07 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-07 12:02, Patrice Colet wrote: > >> De: "Alexandros Drymonitis" > >> By black background you mean the color of [gemwin]? You can >> change that by sending [color 1 1 1( to [gemwin] (this will make >> the whole background white), if this i

Re: [PD] Problem with [link] and [mass]

2013-01-08 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-08 19:02, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > Just an addition to this, there's some more weird behavior. When I > have my patch open, with no bangs sent to [link] or [mass], if I > open the 01_basic.pd patch from pmpd's examples, I get "error: >

Re: [PD] Problem with [link] and [mass]

2013-01-08 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-08 19:18, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > No, that's not the case. I've actually never really touched the > example patch. Anyway, my actual worry is why these objects behave > the way they do in my patch, which is really strange. In order to

Re: [PD] Problem with [link] and [mass]

2013-01-09 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-08 19:47, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > ...Don't really get it. Anyway, it seems it came back to normal. > For some reason it went crazy for some 20 minutes and settled back > to what it's supposed to be doing. Hope I don't get this in a >

Re: [PD] ANN: pd-l2ork first stable release now available

2013-01-15 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-15 04:58, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > The k12 stuff looks promising. > > Playing around with it I wondered what would happen if you just did > everything in the signal domain-- even for the values coming from > the controllers by, say, using a

Re: [PD] the next PdCon in...

2013-01-15 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-15 08:57, Nicolas Montgermont wrote: > Hello all, i guess it's time for me to step in. > > To add my point: in France, students usually start courses between > the 15th of september and the 1st october. So I guess, the > beginning of sept

Re: [PD] the next PdCon in...

2013-01-15 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-15 17:03, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > The dates are fixed with the VIA festival, and CMU could only host > PdCon in 2013 in conjunction with the VIA festival. So the > question is, whether we should go ahead with first week of Octobe

[PD] iemgui_save (was Re: [PD-announce] Pd-extended 0.43.4 release candidate 1: last chance to report your bugs)

2013-01-17 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-17 06:38, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > Turns out the problem was the & character in the label. I fixed it > so please test in tomorrow's build (2013-01-17) > > This patch is what fixes it: > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?

Re: [PD] BiDi-plugin

2013-01-21 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-21 21:07, Anas Ghrab wrote: > Hi all, > > The BiDi-plugin is aborted ? no. fdasfrt IOhannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAlD9

Re: [PD] Mirroring physical patch cables in Pd

2013-01-21 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-21 20:41, Tedb0t wrote: >> You could also just play sine waves thru them and then feed all >> signals to a set of bandpass filters. Measure the amplitude of >> the filtered signals and you know which one you have. But >> perhaps your PWM t

Re: [PD] Gem pix_image load problem

2013-01-22 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-21 23:12, plutek wrote: > hi all! > > simple question here... pix_image is giving me a "failed to load > image" error. i'm certain the path/filename are correct, and i've > tried both png and jpg. any ideas of why Gem isn't loading the > im

Re: [PD] GUI toolkits and custom GUIs WAS: Integra Live 1.5 released

2013-01-22 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-21 23:35, Martin Peach wrote: > Wouldn't it be a good idea to settle on a graphics metalanguage > rather than translating tcl code to qt or whatever? > that's exactly my point: creating a FUDI-style communication from pd->gui, which can eas

Re: [PD] BiDi-plugin

2013-01-22 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-22 11:45, Anas Ghrab wrote: > By the way... I'm using Pd-extended 0.43-4. > > --- Anas > > Le Jan 22, 2013 à 11:37 AM, Anas Ghrab a écrit : > >> So the release is not released ? :o) >> http://puredata.info/downloads/bidi-plugin/releases/

Re: [PD] Jack support on Windows

2013-01-22 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-22 11:57, Esteban Viveros wrote: > Now I can't conclude the compilation... > > I did: cd ~/pure-data/pd/src make -f makefile.mingw clean make -f > makefile.mingw > > Something in jack.h ... I have this file in C:/Program Files > (x86)/Jac

Re: [PD] Jack support on Windows

2013-01-22 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-22 12:04, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 2013-01-22 11:57, Esteban Viveros wrote: >> Now I can't conclude the compilation... > >> I did: cd ~/pure-data/pd/src make -f makefile.mingw clean make >> -f make

Re: [PD] Jack support on Windows

2013-01-22 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-22 12:21, Esteban Viveros wrote: > Ok.. I will do that... But why until te make clean, yesterday, ir > run the compilation? good point. my hint was merely an assumption what might be causing troubles. in this case: are you sure you are usi

Re: [PD] GUI toolkits and custom GUIs WAS: Integra Live 1.5 released

2013-01-22 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-22 12:49, Leandro da Mota Damasceno wrote: > So would it be an updated FUDI or an all new protocol? > it would be FUDI. (no reason to update it) fgamsdr IOhannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: U

Re: [PD] BiDi-plugin

2013-01-22 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-22 12:32, Anas Ghrab wrote: > Thank you for the answer. > > I downloaded again Pd-extended 0.43-4 (I think that the one I had > was a beta one). The BiDi works : which platform are you on? which BiDi-support are you referring to? Gem (whic

Re: [PD] enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ?

2013-01-22 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-22 16:30, Ivica Ico Bukvic wrote: > > Pd-l2ork indeed has its own folder (including pd-l2ork-externals in > home folder and settings file). The conflict is in the /usr/bin/ > folder with binaries that share the same name but not necessarily

Re: [PD] enhance pd-extended with pd-l2ork featues ?

2013-01-22 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-22 17:16, Ivica Bukvic wrote: > AFAIK I use pd-l2ork exclusively, not pd. I f you find it anywhere > that I'm not using that please let me know so I can fix it. > > I need to check whether pdsend/receive is indeed identical before > making

Re: [PD] Raspberry Pi - Audio in and out, low latency

2013-01-23 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-23 09:49, Pierre Massat wrote: > I don't know why it's working. I just hope the next update won't > break that! > > So "-sounddev 2" should work for my card showing up as card 1 ? > Incidentally, there are only two pages that I know of on

Re: [PD] Pd --> Python, IPC, FUDI, pdreceive, et cetera !

2013-01-23 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-23 10:22, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: >> it seems your example is missing the newline (;\n). iirc I've had >> a few pd lockups when sending lots of messages from Processing >> without the newline. > Good to know, and easy to add to the script. And

Re: [PD] Raspberry Pi - Audio in and out, low latency

2013-01-23 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-23 09:49, Pierre Massat wrote: > Unless there's a better place on the web to learn about start-up > flags, i think it would be a good idea to provide more details on > the community website. I always find it frustrating when i have to > spen

Re: [PD] Pd --> Python, IPC, FUDI, pdreceive, et cetera !

2013-01-23 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-23 12:45, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: > > On 23/01/13 10:28, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: >> On 2013-01-23 10:22, Lorenzo Sutton wrote: >>>> it seems your example is missing the newline (;\n). iirc I've >>>&g

Re: [PD] ARCH linux pd-extended vs. pd

2013-01-23 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-23 18:08, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > On 01/23/2013 05:35 AM, Charles Goyard wrote: >> Fero Kiraly wrote: >>> What should be changed (,maybe in pd/src/Makefile.am ? ) to >>> build a pd-ex binary with different name ? >>> >>> now it is

[PD] motion-tracking (was Re: help)

2013-01-24 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-23 14:55, Sujay Mukherjee wrote: > hi i am new to Pd welcome. please don't use generic subjects like "help" or "i have a question". most people who write on this list either have a question or try to answer one. imagine what would happen i

Re: [PD] Can't create gem window on a beagleboard

2013-01-24 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-24 11:19, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > When trying to create a gem window on a beagleboard I get the > following: > > error: GEM: Unable to create single buffer window error: GEM: Error > creating const context error: GEM: A serious error

Re: [PD] Can't create gem window on a beagleboard

2013-01-24 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-24 12:15, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > Well, I'm not aware of such details, to be honest. Since Gem is > installed the Pd version my beagleboard has, I tried to do > something with it. The objects are being created, but no gem > window..

Re: [PD] Can't create gem window on a beagleboard

2013-01-24 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-24 13:26, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > Is there a solution to this? install a gfx-card that is openGL capable (which is not very practical, though; so for now the answer is "no"; alternatives include finding dmotd and asking him to publis

Re: [PD] Building pd-l2ork on arch linux 64

2013-01-28 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-28 09:55, Fero Kiraly wrote: > when I run this command: > > git clone git://github.com/pd-l2ork/pd.git > > it is clonning... but l2ork_addons/spectdelay/spectdelay~ is > MISSING ! (I totally dont understand how it is possibile) > > can an

Re: [PD] Building pd-l2ork on arch linux 64

2013-01-28 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-28 10:17, Fero Kiraly wrote: > thats the thing ! > > I dont have folders with ~ > > What should I do ? > just to be sure: you don't have these folders even when doing an $ ls -la on the cmdline? some graphical filesystem browsers will si

Re: [PD] [GEM][pix_multiimage] error message

2013-01-28 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-28 11:10, Patrice Colet wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using [pix_multiimage] into archlinux 64bit environment. > > When opening the helpfile, I've got this error message into pd > console: > > GEM: Someone sent a bogus pointer to copy2Image >

Re: [PD] can anyone make screencasts of 0.43 editing features?

2013-01-29 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-26 04:04, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > ? full unicode support, so Greek, Japanese, Korean, Chinese, > Hebrew, Arabic, etc. works in patches, filenames, MIDI device > names, etc. doest this make the bidi-plugin obsolete or does it mean "h

Re: [PD] Can I run scripts with [shell]?

2013-01-29 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-29 11:23, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > I checked the help patch of [shell], but if I send a cd command > for example, I don't think that something really happens. I > actually would like to run a script from within Pd, but what I > underst

Re: [PD] Can I run scripts with [shell]?

2013-01-29 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-29 11:59, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > I don't really understand the meaning of 'context' (not the actual > word, but the way you're using it)..how are these contexts > accessible? How are commands being executed when sent to the same > ob

Re: [PD] Can I run scripts with [shell]?

2013-01-29 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-29 13:56, Alexandros Drymonitis wrote: > Ok, I understand the whole 'context', shell thing. I tried what you > guys suggested in a terminal window and kind of got the picture. > But the way [shell] works remains a mystery to me (even though

Re: [PD] How to change the Z-order of gui elements ?

2013-01-30 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-29 23:04, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > > Select-all, then deselect the canvas, then cut then paste. That's > how I do or even better: use "undo" rather than "paste". this allows the cut objects to stay connected with objects outside th

Re: [PD] How to change the Z-order of gui elements ?

2013-01-30 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-30 09:44, Ivica Bukvic wrote: >> Except in both cases you still lose the object state. Pd-l2ork's >> tofront/back is the way to go if you can. sure. but you cannot in current Pd. fgamsdr IOhannes -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Gnu

Re: [PD] [PD-announce] Pd-extended 0.43.4 released!

2013-01-30 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-30 13:59, Pierre-Olivier Boulant wrote: > > On 30/01/2013 13:46, Nicolas Montgermont wrote: >> >> a few comments though, (sorry if I miss previous discussions): - >> is is possible to get rid of the french localization? > > rename or tras

Re: [PD] absolute vs relative filepath on oggread~

2013-01-30 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-30 19:07, Òscar Martínez Carmona wrote: > Hi list, I'm having some trouble trying to open ogg files with > [oggread~] when I send to it the name of the file via OSC. If I use > the relative path in the open message [open ../samples/$1( I ge

[PD] standard library (was Re: [PD-announce] Pd-extended 0.43.4 released!)

2013-01-31 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-30 22:40, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: > A quick internet translations makes me think that I agree with > what cyrille is saying. The preferences shouldn't be used for > loading libraries, as they have been in pd and especially > Pd-extend

Re: [PD] absolute vs relative filepath on oggread~

2013-01-31 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-01-31 09:30, Òscar Martínez Carmona wrote: > Thanx for your reply IOhannnes, I'll check that out later (whenever > I got home after work), the weird thing is that with other > externals [tabplay~] or [readsf~] that worked just fine, is there >

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >