I have been working with PD for a couple weeks now, so I guess this is
my way of saying 'hi' to the community.
I've managed to make heaps of FM stuff, and I'm getting into learning
all the wavetable type objects and how they work. I've probably have
gone through half of the tutorials. It seems to
.
If you're into granular stuff, have a look at my Particlechamber
abstraction:
http://macumbista.net/?page_id=514
Due for an update after 7 long years sometime this spring or summer ;-)
Best,
Derek
Josh Moore wrote:
It's great fun, more stable than Reaktor which I think is yuck to
begin
at my Particlechamber
abstraction:
http://macumbista.net/?page_id=514
Due for an update after 7 long years sometime this spring or summer ;-)
Best,
Derek
Josh Moore wrote:
It's great fun, more stable than Reaktor which I think is yuck to
begin with, and I'm mostly learning for the lack
Well in my opinion most electroacoustic shit is all surrealist/dadaist crap.
The people involved try too hard to be the electronic version of John
Cage, it's quite annoying.
In fact, I'm so against it that I'm going to come up with a parody
album with actual good dance music
that uses elements of
To all involved in this discussion, the last few responses were great. :)
It was a bit harsh to some, and I figured as much but it's also a very
real question.
Beatthefinalboss and a couple others hit the nail on the head, and
that's partially what I meant in my long rant.
From the things I've
Actually, that comment was meant towards Ricardo not Beatthefinalboss,
it's weird reading a mailinglist in gmail. Sorry for the confusion!
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Josh Moore kh405.7h3...@gmail.com wrote:
To all involved in this discussion, the last few responses were great
I just got out of a long and heated argument with someone who claimed
he was an EE and told me that digital synthesizers use CVs. I tried to
explain to him that if they did, it would be ONLY a numerical
conversion so he was wrong and he still insisted that digital
synthesizers used CVs. Has anyone